Abstract
A field experiment with integrated nutrient management by organic and inorganic fertilizers on sugarcane-ratoon system for two cycles was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Kota. The experimental crop was planted on February 25, 2005, ratooning initiated on January 20, 2006 and ratooning of plant crop during 2006-07 was initiated on January 30, 2007 to study the influence of integrated use of organic sources with different levels of mineral nutrition, biofertilizer and biopesticides in plant and ratoon crop, respectively. It was comprised of five treatments. Results revealed that treatment consisting of organic and inorganic fertilizer (T5) significantly produced higher plant and ratoon cane yield over T2 and T3 treatments. There was a drastic decrease in cane growth when resulted to mineral nutrition (T1). The treatment T5 having combination of 75% recommended NPK through inorganic+25% through organic fertilizer (FYM)+biofertilizer and biopesticides) showed higher net monetary return, higher uptake of NPK and higher sugar yield compared to T1 treatment (recommended NPK+micronutrient through inorganics) in plant and ratoon crop. There was a slight reduction in soil pH and increase in electrical conductivity with the application of organic manure. At the end of plant and ratoon crop, the significant increase in available N and K was recorded with the application of T5 treatment over T1 and T4 treatments, whereas T5 treatment was significantly superior over T1 and T2 with respect to available P.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Organic plus inorganic fertilizer (T5) produced higher plant and ratoon cane yield than T2 and T3 in sugarcane.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment with integrated nutrient management by organic and inorganic fertilizers on sugarcane-ratoon system for two cycles was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Kota”
e1“treatment consisting of organic and inorganic fertilizer (T5) significantly produced higher plant and ratoon cane yield over T2 and T3 treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Mineral nutrition alone (T1) drastically decreased cane growth in sugarcane.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment with integrated nutrient management by organic and inorganic fertilizers on sugarcane-ratoon system for two cycles was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Kota”
e2“There was a drastic decrease in cane growth when resulted to mineral nutrition (T1)”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 gave higher net monetary return than T1 in sugarcane.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment with integrated nutrient management by organic and inorganic fertilizers on sugarcane-ratoon system for two cycles was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Kota”
e3“treatment T5 having combination of 75% recommended NPK through inorganic+25% through organic fertilizer (FYM)+biofertilizer and biopesticides) showed higher net monetary return, higher uptake of NPK and higher sugar yield compared to T1 treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 gave higher uptake of NPK than T1 in sugarcane.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment with integrated nutrient management by organic and inorganic fertilizers on sugarcane-ratoon system for two cycles was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Kota”
e3“treatment T5 having combination of 75% recommended NPK through inorganic+25% through organic fertilizer (FYM)+biofertilizer and biopesticides) showed higher net monetary return, higher uptake of NPK and higher sugar yield compared to T1 treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 gave higher sugar yield than T1 in sugarcane.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment with integrated nutrient management by organic and inorganic fertilizers on sugarcane-ratoon system for two cycles was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Kota”
e3“treatment T5 having combination of 75% recommended NPK through inorganic+25% through organic fertilizer (FYM)+biofertilizer and biopesticides) showed higher net monetary return, higher uptake of NPK and higher sugar yield compared to T1 treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic manure slightly reduced soil pH in the sugarcane system.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment with integrated nutrient management by organic and inorganic fertilizers on sugarcane-ratoon system for two cycles was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Kota”
e4“There was a slight reduction in soil pH and increase in electrical conductivity with the application of organic manure”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic manure increased soil electrical conductivity in the sugarcane system.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- application of organic manuree4
- Outcome
- electrical conductivitye4
- Direction
- increasee4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment with integrated nutrient management by organic and inorganic fertilizers on sugarcane-ratoon system for two cycles was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Kota”
e4“There was a slight reduction in soil pH and increase in electrical conductivity with the application of organic manure”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 significantly increased available N and K relative to T1 and T4.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment with integrated nutrient management by organic and inorganic fertilizers on sugarcane-ratoon system for two cycles was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Kota”
e5“the significant increase in available N and K was recorded with the application of T5 treatment over T1 and T4 treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 was significantly superior to T1 and T2 for available P in sugarcane.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment with integrated nutrient management by organic and inorganic fertilizers on sugarcane-ratoon system for two cycles was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Kota”
e6“T5 treatment was significantly superior over T1 and T2 with respect to available P”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
90 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
100 papers more in this group
See all 104 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →inoculation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
74 papers more in this group
See all 78 papers →fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
342 papers more in this group
See all 346 papers →biocontrol · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
biocontrol · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.