Abstract
The herbicide 2,4,5-T [(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy) acetic acid], at concentrations of 10 −4 and 10 −6 M in nutrient media, was more inhibitory to the growth of soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merr. “Acme”) tissue culture than dicamba (3,6-dichloro- o -anisic acid) or picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid). Dicamba (10 −6 and 10 −8 M) and 2,4,5-T (10 −8 M) stimulated growth of soybean tissue. Mixing equimolar solutions of 2,4,5-T + dicamba, 2,4,5-T + picloram, or picloram + dicamba at 10 −4 , 10 −6 , and 10 −8 M did not increase phytotoxicity over that of the most phytotoxic herbicide of the pair.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
At 10 −4 and 10 −6 M, 2,4,5-T inhibited soybean tissue growth more than dicamba or picloram.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Material
- Acmee0
- Treatment
- 2,4,5-Te0
- Outcome
- growth of soybeane0
- Direction
- more inhibitorye0
- Qualifier
- 10 −4 and 10 −6 Me0
- Comparator
- dicambae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The herbicide 2,4,5-T [(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy) acetic acid], at concentrations of 10 −4 and 10 −6 M in nutrient media, was more inhibitory to the growth of soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merr. “Acme”) tissue culture than dicamba (3,6-dichloro- o -anisic acid) or picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid)”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba at 10 −6 and 10 −8 M stimulated soybean tissue growth.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- Dicamba (10 −6 and 10 −8 M)e0
- Outcome
- growth of soybean tissuee0
- Direction
- stimulatede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Dicamba (10 −6 and 10 −8 M) and 2,4,5-T (10 −8 M) stimulated growth of soybean tissue”
Claim · model-written summary
2,4,5-T at 10 −8 M stimulated soybean tissue growth.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- 2,4,5-T (10 −8 M)e0
- Outcome
- growth of soybean tissuee0
- Direction
- stimulatede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Dicamba (10 −6 and 10 −8 M) and 2,4,5-T (10 −8 M) stimulated growth of soybean tissue”
Claim · model-written summary
Equimolar herbicide mixtures did not increase phytotoxicity over the most phytotoxic component.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe1 - Treatment
- 2,4,5-T + dicambae0
- Outcome
- phytotoxicitye0
- Direction
- did not increasee0
- Qualifier
- 10 −4 , 10 −6 , and 10 −8 Me0
- Comparator
- most phytotoxic herbicide of the paire0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Mixing equimolar solutions of 2,4,5-T + dicamba, 2,4,5-T + picloram, or picloram + dicamba at 10 −4 , 10 −6 , and 10 −8 M did not increase phytotoxicity over that of the most phytotoxic herbicide of the pair”
t0“Tissue Culture”
e1“growth of soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merr. “Acme”) tissue culture”
The same questions in other papers
dicamba · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →dicamba · crop injury · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.