Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dicamba plus diflufenzopyr caused less injury and yield loss than dicamba alone.

A claim from Soybean response to plant growth regulator herbicides is affected by other postemergence herbicides · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba plus diflufenzopyr caused less injury and yield loss than dicamba alone.

Treatment
Dicamba plus diflufenzopyre0
Outcome
injury and yield losse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
dicamba applied alonee0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Dicamba plus diflufenzopyr caused less injury and yield loss than dicamba applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1330

Title

Soybean response to plant growth regulator herbicides is affected by other postemergence herbicides

Kevin B. Kelley; Loyd M. Wax; Aaron G. Hager; et al. Weed Science 2005. doi:10.1614/ws-04-078r

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-bb26f8d7d4e70d34e262bcb7860d8c90bf2794812b5234f789936fdf5c1596a6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

dicamba · crop injury · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

37 papers: 8 positive, 29 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Dicamba injured prebloom soybeans more than 2,4-D.

    Response of Soybeans to 2,4-D, Dicamba, and Picloram · 1969 · compared with 2,4-D

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.