Claim · model-written summary
At V3/V4, injury at 7 days rose from 20% at 4.4 g ha −1 to 89% at 280 g ha −1.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Organ / stage
- 7 d after applicatione0
- Treatment
- dicamba at 4.4 g ha −1e0
- Outcome
- Soybean injurye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 20%e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soybean injury 7 d after application was 20% following dicamba at 4.4 g ha −1 and increased to 89% at 280 g ha −1 .”
Title
Soybean Response to Dicamba Applied at Vegetative and Reproductive Growth Stages
James L. Griffin; Matthew J. Bauerle; Daniel O. Stephenson; et al. Weed Technology 2013. doi:10.1614/wt-d-13-00084.1
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect At V3/V4, injury reached 89% at 280 g ha −1 after 7 days.
- Observation By day 14, injury at the same rates increased from 39 to 97%.
- Intervention effect At flowering, injury after 7 days was 19% at 1.1 g ha −1.
- Intervention effect At flowering, injury after 7 days increased to 64% at 70 g ha −1.
- Observation At flowering, injury increased by no more than four percentage points between days 7 and 14.
- Intervention effect At shared rates, injury 14 days after treatment was greatest following V3/V4 application.
- Intervention effect The adverse effects on mature height and yield were greatest after R1 application.
- Intervention effect At 4.4 g ha −1, V3/V4 application reduced yield by 4%.
- Intervention effect At 4.4 g ha −1, R1 application reduced yield by 10%.
- Intervention effect At 17.5 g ha −1, V3/V4 application reduced yield by 15%.
- Intervention effect At 17.5 g ha −1, R1 application reduced yield by 36%.
- Observation Based on yield loss, flowering soybean was about 2.5 times more sensitive than vegetative soybean.