Paper · 2018 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Weed management and rapeseed mustard productivity in conservation agriculture based rice-yellow mustard-greengram cropping system in lateritic belt of West Bengal

K. Charan Teja; B. Duary

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2015–16 and 2016–17 at Agriculture Farm, Institute of Agriculture, Visva-Bharati, Sriniketan, West Bengal to study the effect of tillage and weed management practices on weed growth and productivity of yellow mustard in direct-seeded rice-yellow mustard-greengram cropping system. The experiment was laid out in a strip plot design with four horizontal tillage strips and three vertical weed management strips replicated thrice. Results revealed that conservational tillage (zero tillage + residue) along with recommended herbicide (RH) (pendimethalin at 0.75 kg/ha) + one hand weeding (HW) recorded the lower values of total weed density (6.20 and 6.43 no/m2) and dry weight (1.22 and 1.42 g/m2) and higher values of seed yield (1.20 and 1.46 t/ha) in first and second year, respectively. In second year, conservational tillage even with RH alone registered at par values of total weed density and dry weight with conventional tillage + RH + 1 HW and it also recorded 10.2% higher seed yield than conventional tillage + RH + 1 HW. Thus, conservation tillage along with recommended herbicide alone in yellow mustard appeared to be a promising technique with respect to weed suppression and productivity of yellow mustard in conservation agriculture based rice-mustard sarson-greengram cropping system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with residue, herbicide and hand weeding produced weed densities of 6.20 and 6.43 no/m2 in the first and second years.

Taxon
yellow mustardSinapis albae1
Treatment
zero tillage + residuee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
total weed densitye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
6.20 and 6.43 no/m2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conservational tillage (zero tillage + residue) along with recommended herbicide (RH) (pendimethalin at 0.75 kg/ha) + one hand weeding (HW) recorded the lower values of total weed density (6.20 and 6.43 no/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–700 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed growth and productivity of yellow mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced weed dry weights of 1.22 and 1.42 g/m2 across the two years.

Taxon
yellow mustardSinapis albae2
Treatment
zero tillage + residuee1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
lowere1
Value
1.22 and 1.42 g/m2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry weight (1.22 and 1.42 g/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–736 · show in text ↑
e1

“conservational tillage (zero tillage + residue) along with recommended herbicide (RH) (pendimethalin at 0.75 kg/ha) + one hand weeding (HW) recorded the lower values of total weed density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–678 · show in text ↑
e2

“weed growth and productivity of yellow mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced seed yields of 1.20 and 1.46 t/ha across the two years.

Taxon
yellow mustardSinapis albae2
Treatment
zero tillage + residuee1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.20 and 1.46 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher values of seed yield (1.20 and 1.46 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–789 · show in text ↑
e1

“conservational tillage (zero tillage + residue) along with recommended herbicide (RH) (pendimethalin at 0.75 kg/ha) + one hand weeding (HW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–630 · show in text ↑
e2

“weed growth and productivity of yellow mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In year two, conservation tillage with herbicide alone had weed density and dry weight at par with conventional tillage plus herbicide and hand weeding.

Taxon
yellow mustardSinapis albae1
Treatment
conservational tillage even with RH alonee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
total weed density and dry weighte0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
conventional tillage + RH + 1 HWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In second year, conservational tillage even with RH alone registered at par values of total weed density and dry weight with conventional tillage + RH + 1 HW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed growth and productivity of yellow mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In year two, conservation tillage with herbicide alone raised seed yield by 10.2% relative to conventional tillage, herbicide and hand weeding.

Taxon
yellow mustardSinapis albae1
Treatment
conservational tillage even with RH alonee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.2%e0
Comparator
conventional tillage + RH + 1 HWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In second year, conservational tillage even with RH alone registered at par values of total weed density and dry weight with conventional tillage + RH + 1 HW and it also recorded 10.2% higher seed yield than conventional tillage + RH + 1 HW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1070 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed growth and productivity of yellow mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–256 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend conservation tillage with herbicide alone for mustard weed suppression and productivity.

Taxon
yellow mustardSinapis albae0
Outcome
conservation tillage along with recommended herbicide alonee0
Qualifier
appeared to be a promising techniquee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conservation tillage along with recommended herbicide alone in yellow mustard appeared to be a promising technique with respect to weed suppression and productivity of yellow mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1260 · show in text ↑

herbicide · weed · Sinapis alba (white mustard)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · yield · Sinapis alba (white mustard)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tillage · yield · Sinapis alba (white mustard)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.