Abstract
The article focuses on the research results concerning the effect of long-term application of basic tillage systems and fertilizing on the productivity of mustard white. The research was being conducted in four-field crop rotation of the stationary experiment under conditions of Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine during 2009–2016. It was established that in the background of mineral fertilization in the dose N30Р30К30, the highest yield of white mustard seeds (2,06 t/ha) was obtained for the main system of soil tillage. The use of non-polar soil treatments led to a decrease in the yield of white mustard seeds by 1–17 % compared to plowing. The lowest yield of white mustard seeds (1,7 t/ha) was obtained for the discovery at a depth of 6–8 cm. The use of field cultivation of soil on the background of organo-mineral fertilization, which involves leaving the precursor straw in the straw field and introducing N30Р30К30, provides the yield of white mustard seeds – 2,05 t/ha. For conducting without field operations of soil yields are reduced by 2–20 % compared to plowing. The best indicators of the structure of the white mustard yield were obtained for the main system of soil cultivation and the mineral fertilizer system. By organo-mineral system fertilizer is reduced by 7 % height of plants, by 5 and 12 %, the number and weight of seeds from one plant. On the basis of the conducted researches, the economic efficiency of the cultivation of white mustard is determined depending on the influence of the investigated factors under conditions of Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. It was established that the highest contingent net profit was obtained for the use of the system of basic soil cultivation on the mineral and organo-mineral fertilizer backgrounds. Organo-mineral fertilizers increase by 93–123 % the profitability of growing white mustard depending on the system of basic cultivation of soil in comparison with the mineral system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Main soil tillage with mineral fertilizer had the highest white mustard seed yield, 2,06 t/ha.
- Taxon
- white mustard
Sinapis albae0 - Treatment
- main system of soil tillagee0
- Outcome
- yield of white mustard seedse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2,06 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- mineral fertilization in the dose N30Р30К30e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in the background of mineral fertilization in the dose N30Р30К30, the highest yield of white mustard seeds (2,06 t/ha) was obtained for the main system of soil tillage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Non-polar soil treatments decreased white mustard seed yield by 1–17 % against plowing.
- Taxon
- white mustardSinapis albae0
- Treatment
- non-polar soil treatmentse0
- Outcome
- yield of white mustard seedse0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 1–17 %e0
- Comparator
- plowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The use of non-polar soil treatments led to a decrease in the yield of white mustard seeds by 1–17 % compared to plowing.”
Claim · model-written summary
The lowest white mustard seed yield, 1,7 t/ha, occurred with discovery at 6–8 cm.
- Taxon
- white mustardSinapis albae0
- Treatment
- discovery at a depth of 6–8 cme0
- Outcome
- yield of white mustard seedse0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 1,7 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lowest yield of white mustard seeds (1,7 t/ha) was obtained for the discovery at a depth of 6–8 cm.”
Claim · model-written summary
Field cultivation with organo-mineral fertilizer gave white mustard seed yield of 2,05 t/ha.
- Taxon
- white mustardSinapis albae0
- Treatment
- field cultivation of soile0
- Outcome
- yield of white mustard seedse0
- Value
- 2,05 t/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The use of field cultivation of soil on the background of organo-mineral fertilization, which involves leaving the precursor straw in the straw field and introducing N30Р30К30, provides the yield of white mustard seeds – 2,05 t/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
Without field operations, white mustard soil yields fell 2–20 % versus plowing.
- Taxon
- WHITE MUSTARDSinapis albat0
- Treatment
- without field operationse0
- Outcome
- soil yieldse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 2–20 %e0
- Comparator
- plowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For conducting without field operations of soil yields are reduced by 2–20 % compared to plowing.”
t0“WHITE MUSTARD”
Claim · model-written summary
Main soil cultivation with mineral fertilizer gave the best white mustard yield structure indicators.
- Taxon
- white mustardSinapis albae0
- Treatment
- main system of soil cultivation and the mineral fertilizer systeme0
- Outcome
- indicators of the structure of the white mustard yielde0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best indicators of the structure of the white mustard yield were obtained for the main system of soil cultivation and the mineral fertilizer system.”
Claim · model-written summary
Organo-mineral fertilizer reduced white mustard plant height by 7 %.
- Taxon
- WHITE MUSTARDSinapis albat0
- Treatment
- organo-mineral system fertilizere0
- Outcome
- height of plantse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 7 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“By organo-mineral system fertilizer is reduced by 7 % height of plants”
t0“WHITE MUSTARD”
Claim · model-written summary
Organo-mineral fertilizer reduced the number of seeds per white mustard plant by 5 %.
- Taxon
- WHITE MUSTARDSinapis albat0
- Treatment
- organo-mineral system fertilizere0
- Outcome
- numbere0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 5e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“By organo-mineral system fertilizer is reduced by 7 % height of plants, by 5 and 12 %, the number and weight of seeds from one plant.”
t0“WHITE MUSTARD”
Claim · model-written summary
Organo-mineral fertilizer reduced weight of seeds per white mustard plant by 12 %.
- Taxon
- WHITE MUSTARDSinapis albat0
- Treatment
- organo-mineral system fertilizere0
- Outcome
- weight of seeds from one plante0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 12 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“By organo-mineral system fertilizer is reduced by 7 % height of plants, by 5 and 12 %, the number and weight of seeds from one plant.”
t0“WHITE MUSTARD”
Claim · model-written summary
Basic soil cultivation had the highest contingent net profit under both fertilizer backgrounds.
- Taxon
- WHITE MUSTARDSinapis albat0
- Treatment
- system of basic soil cultivatione0
- Outcome
- contingent net profite0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest contingent net profit was obtained for the use of the system of basic soil cultivation on the mineral and organo-mineral fertilizer backgrounds.”
t0“WHITE MUSTARD”
Claim · model-written summary
Organo-mineral fertilizer increased white mustard profitability by 93–123 % versus mineral fertilizer.
- Taxon
- white mustardSinapis albae0
- Treatment
- Organo-mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- profitability of growing white mustarde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 93–123 %e0
- Comparator
- mineral systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Organo-mineral fertilizers increase by 93–123 % the profitability of growing white mustard depending on the system of basic cultivation of soil in comparison with the mineral system.”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · Sinapis alba (white mustard)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →fertilization · yield · Sinapis alba (white mustard)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →tillage · yield · Sinapis alba (white mustard)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.