Paper · 2019 · Agronomy Journal

Fertilizer Placement Affects Corn and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in a Claypan Soil

Tyler W. Steusloff; Kelly A. Nelson; Peter P. Motavalli; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Agronomic efficiency (AE) and apparent N recovery efficiency (RE) can be improved by developing more effective N fertilizer placement strategies; however, minimal research has focused on poorly‐drained claypan soils which are prone to saturated conditions and gaseous N loss. The objective of this 2‐yr study was to determine the effectiveness of different N fertilizer placement methods on corn ( Zea mays L.) grain yield, grain quality, silage yield, N uptake, AE, RE, and spatial soil N distribution over time. Nitrogen placement treatments included deep‐banded urea (DB) or urea plus nitrapyrin (DB+NI) at a depth of 20 cm compared to urea broadcast applied (BC) or BC incorporated to a depth of 8 cm (BCI). The DB and DB+NI treatments generally resulted in higher grain and silage yields than the non‐treated control (NC), BCI, and BC treatments. The DB+NI increased silage yield 4.14 to 4.77 Mg ha −1 over the BC and DB treatments in 2016. Additionally, DB+NI resulted in 21 and 27% greater N uptake and RE than other N placement treatments. Deep‐banded treatments with and without NI had the highest AE (10.3–13.3 kg kg N −1 ) compared to other treatments. Deep‐banded urea had significantly higher soil NO 3 –N concentrations in deep soil layers compared to DB+NI when sampled in July. Results indicated DB+NI increased N availability for a longer period during the growing season and was a reliable strategy for increasing corn yields and improving AE and RE on a poorly‐drained claypan soil. Core Ideas Yield response to urea was ranked DB+NI = DB > BCI > BC. Apparent N recovery efficiency was greatest (76.5%) with DB+NI. Highest agronomic efficiency (10.3 to 13.3 kg kgN −1 ) was observed for DB and DB+NI. Distribution of pHs, NO 3 ‐N, and NH 4 ‐N in the soil was affected by urea placement.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep-banded urea increased grain and silage yield versus controls and other placements.

Treatment
DB and DB+NI treatmentse0
Outcome
grain and silage yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non‐treated control (NC), BCI, and BC treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DB and DB+NI treatments generally resulted in higher grain and silage yields than the non‐treated control (NC), BCI, and BC treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DB+NI increased silage yield over BC and DB in 2016.

Treatment
DB+NIe0
Outcome
silage yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.14 to 4.77 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
2016e0
Comparator
BC and DB treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DB+NI increased silage yield 4.14 to 4.77 Mg ha −1 over the BC and DB treatments in 2016.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DB+NI gave 21% greater N uptake than other placements.

Treatment
DB+NIe0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
greatere0
Value
21e0
Comparator
other N placement treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DB+NI resulted in 21 and 27% greater N uptake and RE than other N placement treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DB+NI gave 27% greater recovery efficiency.

Treatment
DB+NIe0
Outcome
REe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
27%e0
Comparator
other N placement treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DB+NI resulted in 21 and 27% greater N uptake and RE than other N placement treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep-banded treatments had the highest agronomic efficiency.

Treatment
Deep‐banded treatments with and without NIe0
Outcome
AEe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.3–13.3 kg kg N −1e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep‐banded treatments with and without NI had the highest AE (10.3–13.3 kg kg N −1 ) compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep-banded urea had higher deep-soil nitrate than DB+NI in July.

Treatment
Deep‐banded ureae0
Outcome
soil NO 3 –N concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
Julye0
Comparator
DB+NIe0
Setting
deep soil layerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep‐banded urea had significantly higher soil NO 3 –N concentrations in deep soil layers compared to DB+NI when sampled in July.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DB+NI increased nitrogen availability for longer during the growing season.

Treatment
DB+NIe0
Outcome
N availabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
longer period during the growing seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated DB+NI increased N availability for a longer period during the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea placement affected distributions of soil pH, nitrate and ammonium.

Treatment
urea placemente0
Outcome
Distribution of pHs, NO 3 ‐N, and NH 4 ‐N in the soile0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Distribution of pHs, NO 3 ‐N, and NH 4 ‐N in the soil was affected by urea placement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1805 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

489 papers: 403 positive, 86 negative or no effect

402 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Seed-furrow P and banded N increased corn P accumulation versus surface application.

    Corn Response to Fertilizer Placement Treatments in an Irrigated No‐Till System · 2000 · compared with P and N fertilizers were applied to the soil surface

    Same directionCited by this paper

485 papers more in this group

See all 489 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.