Paper · 2009 · Acta Agraria Debreceniensis

Effect of mineral fertilizers with different sulphur content on the yield of winter wheat in a small plot experiment

Éva Mars; Péter Sipos; Norbert Boros; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We can find more and more references on the importance of sulphur and sulphur fertilization, mainly in the case of most important field crops, as cereals, maize, and the oilseeds. The traditional sulphur sources continuously lost their importance by the stringent air pollution orders and nowadays they are not able to meet the demands of plants. Besides, the application of superphosphate, as phosphorus mineral fertilizer, decreased in several countries. Sulphur fertilization is required in most cases to reach the required yields and quality parameters. The lack ofsulphur causes decreased nitrogen utilization and yield by cereals as winter wheat, moreover, results less favourable baking parameters.We have examined the N and S content of different parts of winter wheat plants in a small plot experiment at the University of Debrecen, Centre of Agricultural Sciences, Látókép Experimental Station. We have also studied the effect of different sulphur fertilization forms and doses on the baking quality parameters and yield. Our aim was to contribute to the development of yield and quality improving sulphur fertilization methods, adaptable by practice.We have measured the lowest yield in the case of one of the control plots, and 100 kg/ha nitrogen, 80 kg/ha potassium and 70 kg/ha phosphorus nutrient supply resulted the lowest yield (8.7 kg/plot). The maximum yield, 10.2 kg/plot was also experienced on superphosphate fertilized plot by the application of 140 kg/ha phosphorus dose. Application the first dose of both Biofert and FitoHorm 32 S leaf fertilizers raised the yield from9.1 to 9.9 kg/plot. ANOVA proved that Biofert and FitoHorm 32 S had no significant effect on the amount of yield, the increase is only a tendency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100 kg/ha N, 80 kg/ha K and 70 kg/ha P nutrient supply gave the lowest winter wheat yield (8.7 kg/plot).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
100 kg/ha nitrogen, 80 kg/ha potassium and 70 kg/ha phosphorus nutrient supplye1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
loweste1
Value
8.7 kg/plote1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of mineral fertilizers with different sulphur content on the yield of winter wheat in a small plot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 kg/ha nitrogen, 80 kg/ha potassium and 70 kg/ha phosphorus nutrient supply resulted the lowest yield (8.7 kg/plot)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1358 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest winter wheat yield was measured in one of the control plots.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
yielde1
Comparator
control plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of mineral fertilizers with different sulphur content on the yield of winter wheat in a small plot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
e1

“We have measured the lowest yield in the case of one of the control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum winter wheat yield (10.2 kg/plot) was obtained on the superphosphate plot receiving 140 kg/ha phosphorus.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
superphosphate fertilized plot by the application of 140 kg/ha phosphorus dosee1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
10.2 kg/plote1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of mineral fertilizers with different sulphur content on the yield of winter wheat in a small plot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum yield, 10.2 kg/plot was also experienced on superphosphate fertilized plot by the application of 140 kg/ha phosphorus dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofert leaf fertilizer raised winter wheat yield from 9.1 to 9.9 kg/plot, but the increase was not significant and only a tendency.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Bioferte1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
raisede1
Value
9.1 to 9.9 kg/plote1
Qualifier
the increase is only a tendencye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of mineral fertilizers with different sulphur content on the yield of winter wheat in a small plot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application the first dose of both Biofert and FitoHorm 32 S leaf fertilizers raised the yield from9.1 to 9.9 kg/plot. ANOVA proved that Biofert and FitoHorm 32 S had no significant effect on the amount of yield, the increase is only a tendency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FitoHorm 32 S leaf fertilizer raised winter wheat yield from 9.1 to 9.9 kg/plot, but the increase was not significant and only a tendency.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
FitoHorm 32 Se1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
raisede1
Value
9.1 to 9.9 kg/plote1
Qualifier
the increase is only a tendencye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of mineral fertilizers with different sulphur content on the yield of winter wheat in a small plot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application the first dose of both Biofert and FitoHorm 32 S leaf fertilizers raised the yield from9.1 to 9.9 kg/plot. ANOVA proved that Biofert and FitoHorm 32 S had no significant effect on the amount of yield, the increase is only a tendency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1741 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 227 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 227 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

253 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.