Paper · 2018 · Journal of Plant Production

Effect of Foliar Application with Micronutrients under Different Fertilizer Levels on Cotton Cultivar Giza 94

Amal Abdel-Aal

12
claims
37
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out in Sakha Agricultural Research Station at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, during the growing seasons 2016 and 2017 to study the effect of foliar application with micronutrients under different NPK fertilizer levels on growth, earliness, yield and its components and fiber traits of cotton on the cotton cultivar (Giza 94) belonging to (Gossypium barbadense, L). Each experiment was laid out in a split plot design with four replications. The main plots were allocated to three NPK fertilizer levels i.e., (60 kg N + 37.5 kg P2O5 + 48 kg K2O/fad.), (45 kg N + 22.5 kg P2O5 + 36 kg K2O/fad.), (30 kg N + 15 kg P2O5 + 24 kg K2O/fad.). The sub-plots had to six rates of micronutrients, (without, zinc, iron, calcium, manganese, zinc+iron+ calcium+ manganese). Foliar spraying three times (at squaring, initiation of flowering and two weeks after flowering). The obtained results were as follows:1- The levels of NPK had significant effect on plant height, some earliness parameters, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield. While, did not exhibit significant effect on lint percentage and seed index under study in both seasons. 2- The micronutrients had significant effect on growth, some earliness parameters, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield/fad. But, had insignificant effect on lint percentage and seed index in both seasons.3- The interaction between treatments had significant effect on plant height, days to the first flower an earliness percentage in 2016 and 2017 seasons. But, insignificantly affected first sympodial node, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/feddan, lint percentage and seed index in both seasons.3- The levels of NPK, micronutrients and interaction between them had a not significant effect on all fiber properties. Therefore, it could be concluded that the highest seed cotton yield/fad. of cotton (Giza 94) was obtained from the high NPK fertilizer level (60 kg N + 37.5 kg P2O5 + 48 kg K2O/fad.) and foliar application with micronutrients fertilizer (Zinc+ Iron+ Calcium+Manganese) three times at squaring, initiation of flowering and two weeks after flowering.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK levels significantly affected plant height and earliness parameters.

Treatment
levels of NPKe0
Outcome
plant height, some earliness parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The levels of NPK had significant effect on plant height, some earliness parameters, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK levels significantly affected open boll number, boll weight and seed cotton yield.

Treatment
levels of NPKe0
Outcome
number of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The levels of NPK had significant effect on plant height, some earliness parameters, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK levels did not significantly affect lint percentage or seed index.

Treatment
levels of NPKe1
Outcome
lint percentage and seed indexe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not exhibit significant effect on lint percentage and seed index under study in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“The levels of NPK had significant effect on plant height, some earliness parameters, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrients significantly affected growth and earliness.

Treatment
micronutrientse0
Outcome
growth, some earliness parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The micronutrients had significant effect on growth, some earliness parameters, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield/fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1338 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrients significantly affected boll number, boll weight and seed cotton yield.

Treatment
micronutrientse0
Outcome
number of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield/fad.e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The micronutrients had significant effect on growth, some earliness parameters, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield/fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1338 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrients did not significantly affect lint percentage or seed index.

Treatment
micronutrientse1
Outcome
lint percentage and seed indexe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had insignificant effect on lint percentage and seed index in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1419 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“The micronutrients had significant effect on growth, some earliness parameters, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield/fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The NPK by micronutrient interaction significantly affected height, first flower timing and earliness percentage.

Treatment
interaction between treatmentse0
Outcome
plant height, days to the first flower an earliness percentagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between treatments had significant effect on plant height, days to the first flower an earliness percentage in 2016 and 2017 seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1571 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment interaction did not significantly affect the first sympodial node, boll traits, yield, lint percentage or seed index.

Treatment
interaction between treatmentse1
Outcome
first sympodial node, number of open bolls/plant, boll weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“insignificantly affected first sympodial node, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/feddan, lint percentage and seed index in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1738 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“The interaction between treatments had significant effect on plant height, days to the first flower an earliness percentage in 2016 and 2017 seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK levels did not significantly affect fiber properties.

Treatment
levels of NPKe0
Outcome
all fiber propertiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The levels of NPK, micronutrients and interaction between them had a not significant effect on all fiber properties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1741–1857 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrients did not significantly affect fiber properties.

Treatment
micronutrientse0
Outcome
all fiber propertiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The levels of NPK, micronutrients and interaction between them had a not significant effect on all fiber properties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1741–1857 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The NPK by micronutrient interaction did not significantly affect fiber properties.

Treatment
interaction between theme0
Outcome
all fiber propertiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The levels of NPK, micronutrients and interaction between them had a not significant effect on all fiber properties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1741–1857 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest seed cotton yield occurred with the high NPK level and combined foliar micronutrients.

Material
Giza 94e0
Treatment
high NPK fertilizer level (60 kg N + 37.5 kg P2O5 + 48 kg K2O/fad.) and foliar application with micronutrients fertilizer (Zinc+ Iron+ Calcium+Manganese)e0
Outcome
seed cotton yield/fad.e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest seed cotton yield/fad. of cotton (Giza 94) was obtained from the high NPK fertilizer level (60 kg N + 37.5 kg P2O5 + 48 kg K2O/fad.) and foliar application with micronutrients fertilizer (Zinc+ Iron+ Calcium+Manganese) three times at squaring, initiation of flowering and two weeks after flowering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–2206 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

97 papers: 86 positive, 11 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

micronutrient · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 95 positive, 9 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 82 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.