Paper · 2019 · Agricultural Science and Technology

Effect of salinity on morpho-physiological parameters and nitrogen content in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

K. Fatiha; H. Abdelkrim; B. Abdelkader

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract. To characterize the effect of salt stress on six varieties of chickpea (Cicer areitenumL.): ILC 32/79, Flip 84/92C, Ghab4, Belkhadem, Collection 28 and F97/555, morphological and physiological parameters of the plants were studied to determine which can be cultivated under salty conditions. The genotypes were subjected to three increasing concentrations of NaCl (50, 75 and 100mM) and compared to an unstressed control (0mM NaCl).The results showed the studied genotypes behaved differently depending on saline concentrations, and plant water content decreased depending on NaCl concentrations, with a higher reduction in root dry matter. The root dry weight/shoot dry weight ratio decreased with high NaCl concentrations that caused reductions in root volume, number of nodules, and total nitrogen. It appeared the ILC 32/79 and collection 28 varieties were the most salinity-tolerant genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea genotypes differed in response to saline concentrations.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
saline concentrationse0
Outcome
genotypes behaved differentlye0
Direction
differentlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed the studied genotypes behaved differently depending on saline concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant water content decreased with increasing NaCl concentrations.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
NaCl concentrationse0
Outcome
plant water contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant water content decreased depending on NaCl concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–605 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry matter showed a higher reduction.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
salinityt0
Outcome
root dry mattere0
Direction
higher reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with a higher reduction in root dry matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–650 · show in text ↑
t0

“salinity on morpho-physiological parameters and nitrogen content in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High NaCl decreased the root dry weight to shoot dry weight ratio.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
high NaCl concentrationse0
Outcome
root dry weight/shoot dry weight ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root dry weight/shoot dry weight ratio decreased with high NaCl concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High NaCl reduced root volume, nodule number and total nitrogen.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
high NaCl concentrationse0
Outcome
root volume, number of nodules, and total nitrogene0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high NaCl concentrations that caused reductions in root volume, number of nodules, and total nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ILC 32/79 and collection 28 were the most salt tolerant genotypes.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
ILC 32/79 and collection 28e0
Outcome
most salinity-tolerant genotypese0
Direction
most salinity-tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It appeared the ILC 32/79 and collection 28 varieties were the most salinity-tolerant genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–86 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

29 papers: 7 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

sodium chloride · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

sodium chloride · soil: physics · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

salinity · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

66 papers: 6 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.