Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT WATER QUANTITIES ON GROWTH AND FRUIT QUALITY OF OLIVE TREES UNDER NEW RECLAIMED LANDS CONDITIONS

A. El-Taweel; A. Farag

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during two successive seasons (2014 and 2015) in a private orchard farm, located at the 64 km on the Cairo-Alexandria Desert Road, to study the effect of different irrigation levels, irrigation methods and olive cultivars on plant growth and yield of olive trees(Olea europara, L.). Treatments were: a- three irrigation levels: 4384 m3/feddan(100%), 3740 m3/feddans (85%) and 3089 m3/feddan (70%); b- two drip irrigation methods: on-line surface irrigation and in-line sub surface irrigation and c- two olive cultivars, Picual and Manzanillo. The experiment was designed in a split-split plot with three replicates. Estimated irrigation water was calculated, using FAO method, in order to compare between applied and estimated irrigation regime. Data revealed that using 3740m3/fed irrigation level gave the highest growth and yield compared with other treatments. The Estimated irrigation water was close to applied treatment 3740 m3/fed. In-line (surface irrigation) method recorded the highest yield and oil during the two successive seasons. The oil content in fruit increased with water decrease. The Picual cultivar showed the highest oil content while, Manzanillo cultivar gave the highest yield. The interaction between the three tested factors show that the 3740m3/fed treatment with the In-line surface irrigation combined with Manzanillo cultivar was the best combined treatment. The highest WUE was found in 3089 m3/ fed. with subsurface irrigation combined with Manzanillo cultivar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An irrigation level of 3740m3/fed gave the highest growth and yield.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
3740m3/fed irrigation levele0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using 3740m3/fed irrigation level gave the highest growth and yield compared with other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“OLIVE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated irrigation water was close to the applied 3740 m3/fed treatment.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Outcome
Estimated irrigation watere0
Comparator
applied treatment 3740 m3/fede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Estimated irrigation water was close to applied treatment 3740 m3/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“OLIVE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In-line surface irrigation produced the highest yield and oil.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
In-line (surface irrigation) methode0
Outcome
yield and oile0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In-line (surface irrigation) method recorded the highest yield and oil during the two successive seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“OLIVE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit oil content increased as water decreased.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
water decreasee0
Outcome
oil content in fruite0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The oil content in fruit increased with water decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“OLIVE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Picual had the highest oil content.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Material
Picuale0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Picual cultivar showed the highest oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“OLIVE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manzanillo had the highest yield.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Material
Manzanilloe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manzanillo cultivar gave the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“OLIVE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of 3740m3/fed, in-line surface irrigation and Manzanillo was best.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Material
Manzanilloe0
Treatment
3740m3/fed treatmente0
Outcome
best combined treatmente0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 3740m3/fed treatment with the In-line surface irrigation combined with Manzanillo cultivar was the best combined treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“OLIVE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest water-use efficiency occurred with 3089 m3/fed, subsurface irrigation and Manzanillo.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Material
Manzanilloe0
Treatment
3089 m3/ fed. with subsurface irrigatione0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest WUE was found in 3089 m3/ fed. with subsurface irrigation combined with Manzanillo cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1527 · show in text ↑
t0

“OLIVE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ

53 papers: 26 positive, 27 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.