Paper · 2011 · Acta Horticulturae

DEFICIT IRRIGATION EFFECTS ON YIELD COMPONENTS OF OLIVE TREES DURING THE ONSET OF FRUIT PRODUCTION

G. Caruso; R. Gucci; H.F. Rapoport

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A 3-year deficit irrigation study was conducted on young olive (Olea europaea 'Frantoio') trees to determine the effect of reduced water supply from the onset of full fruit production on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics, and yield components. Irrigation was carried out from 5-6 until 5-19 weeks after full bloom (AFB) using subsurface drip lines. The volume of water applied to the fully-irrigated trees, calculated from effective evapotranspiration was 558, 1293, and 1857 m 3 ha -1 in 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively. During the same irrigation period the deficit-irrigated trees received approximately 50% total water of the fully-irrigated trees. Deficit irrigation reduced the trunk cross sectional area (TCSA) to 69% of the fully-irrigated treatment over the three years. Yield components were differently affected by deficit irrigation. Over the 3-year period fruit yield and oil yield of deficit irrigated trees were 79 and 83% those of well irrigated ones, respectively but, when expressed on a TCSA basis, they were 89 and 100%. Fruit fresh weight and pulp/pit ratio were decreased slightly, although non-significantly, with the 50% deficit irrigation, whereas oil in the mesocarp basis was similar in both watering regimes. These results show that deficit irrigation starting from the onset of fruit production is sustainable, allowing substantial saving of water in olive orchards.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation reduced olive trunk cross sectional area to 69% of fully irrigated trees over three years.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
'Frantoio'e0
Treatment
Deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
trunk cross sectional area (TCSA)e1
Direction
reducede1
Value
69%e1
Qualifier
over the three yearse1
Comparator
fully-irrigated treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“young olive (Olea europaea 'Frantoio') trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Deficit irrigation reduced the trunk cross sectional area (TCSA) to 69% of the fully-irrigated treatment over the three years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigated olive trees had fruit yield of 79% of well irrigated trees over three years.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
'Frantoio'e0
Treatment
deficit irrigatede1
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
79e1
Qualifier
Over the 3-year periode1
Comparator
well irrigatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“young olive (Olea europaea 'Frantoio') trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Over the 3-year period fruit yield and oil yield of deficit irrigated trees were 79 and 83% those of well irrigated ones, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigated olive trees had oil yield of 83% of well irrigated trees over three years.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
'Frantoio'e0
Treatment
deficit irrigatede1
Outcome
oil yielde1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
83%e1
Comparator
well irrigatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“young olive (Olea europaea 'Frantoio') trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Over the 3-year period fruit yield and oil yield of deficit irrigated trees were 79 and 83% those of well irrigated ones, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On a trunk cross sectional area basis, deficit irrigated olive fruit yield was 89% of well irrigated trees.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
deficit irrigatede1
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
89e1
Qualifier
on a TCSA basise1
Comparator
well irrigatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“young olive (Olea europaea 'Frantoio') trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Over the 3-year period fruit yield and oil yield of deficit irrigated trees were 79 and 83% those of well irrigated ones, respectively but, when expressed on a TCSA basis, they were 89 and 100%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On a trunk cross sectional area basis, deficit irrigated olive oil yield was 100% of well irrigated trees.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
deficit irrigatede1
Outcome
oil yielde1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Value
100%e1
Qualifier
on a TCSA basise1
Comparator
well irrigatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“young olive (Olea europaea 'Frantoio') trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Over the 3-year period fruit yield and oil yield of deficit irrigated trees were 79 and 83% those of well irrigated ones, respectively but, when expressed on a TCSA basis, they were 89 and 100%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit fresh weight decreased slightly and nonsignificantly with 50% deficit irrigation.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
50% deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
Fruit fresh weighte1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
slightlye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“young olive (Olea europaea 'Frantoio') trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit fresh weight and pulp/pit ratio were decreased slightly, although non-significantly, with the 50% deficit irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pulp/pit ratio decreased slightly and nonsignificantly with 50% deficit irrigation.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
50% deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
pulp/pit ratioe1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
slightlye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“young olive (Olea europaea 'Frantoio') trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit fresh weight and pulp/pit ratio were decreased slightly, although non-significantly, with the 50% deficit irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesocarp oil was similar under both watering regimes.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
watering regimese1
Outcome
oil in the mesocarp basise1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
both watering regimese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“young olive (Olea europaea 'Frantoio') trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“oil in the mesocarp basis was similar in both watering regimes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1245 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that deficit irrigation from onset of fruit production is sustainable and saves substantial water in olive orchards.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Outcome
deficit irrigation starting from the onset of fruit production is sustainablee0
Qualifier
substantial saving of watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficit irrigation starting from the onset of fruit production is sustainable, allowing substantial saving of water in olive orchards.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1404 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ

44 papers: 22 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

irrigation · yield · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ

53 papers: 26 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

irrigation · quality: oil · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 15 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.