Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Production

Effect of Water Stress and Phosphorus Fertilizer Rates on Growth and Seed Yield of Cowpea Under El-Arish Condition

M. Ibrahim; M. El-Kassas

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out during summer seasons of 2014 and 2015 at Exp. Farm, Fac. Environ. Agric. Sci., El-Arish, North Sinai, Egypt, to study the effect of water stress and phosphorus rates on growth, yield and its components as well as water and phosphorus use efficiency on cowpea cv. '' Kafr-El Sheikh'' grown under sandy soil conditions using drip irrigation system. The experiment included 12 treatments, which were the combinations of three water levels; viz., 50, 75 and 100 % of irrigation water requirements (IWR) and four rates of phosphorus (0, 20, 40 and 60 kg P2O5 / fed.). The results show that increasing irrigation deficit increased water saving and water use efficiency (WUE), however it reduce seed yield/fed. The highest value of water saving and WUE was obtained from 50% IWR treatment. However, the highest value of phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) was achieved by treatment received 40 kg P2O5/fed. as well as, significant differences among irrigation water levels and phosphorus rates and their interactions were detected for all studied traits in both seasons. The high level of IWR (100%) gave the best values for all traits under study without significant differences when compared with 75% of IWR for some traits, except protein % which increased with addition of the lowest level (50% IWR) in both seasons. Application of phosphorus at rates of 40 or 60 kg P2O5 /fed. exhibited the highest results for all studied characters in both seasons. The best combinations treatments for growth and yield were supplying cowpea plants with 100 % of IWR and fertilizing the highest two rates of phosphorus (40 or 60 kg P2O5/fed. for all traits, followed by the medium level (75% of IWR) with the both high rates of P2O5.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation deficit increased water saving.

Treatment
increasing irrigation deficite0
Outcome
water savinge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing irrigation deficit increased water saving and water use efficiency (WUE), however it reduce seed yield/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation deficit increased water use efficiency (WUE).

Treatment
increasing irrigation deficite0
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing irrigation deficit increased water saving and water use efficiency (WUE), however it reduce seed yield/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation deficit reduce seed yield/fed..

Treatment
increasing irrigation deficite0
Outcome
seed yield/fed.e0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing irrigation deficit increased water saving and water use efficiency (WUE), however it reduce seed yield/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% IWR treatment gave the highest water saving.

Treatment
50% IWR treatmente0
Outcome
water savinge0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest value of water saving and WUE was obtained from 50% IWR treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% IWR treatment gave the highest WUE.

Treatment
50% IWR treatmente0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest value of water saving and WUE was obtained from 50% IWR treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus use efficiency was highest at 40 kg P2O5/fed.

Treatment
40 kg P2O5/fed.e0
Outcome
phosphorus use efficiency (PUE)e0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest value of phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) was achieved by treatment received 40 kg P2O5/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation level, phosphorus rate, and their interaction differed significantly for all studied traits in both seasons.

Outcome
all studied traitse0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences among irrigation water levels and phosphorus rates and their interactions were detected for all studied traits in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100% IWR gave the best overall trait values; some traits did not differ significantly from 75% IWR.

Treatment
IWR (100%)e0
Outcome
all traits under studye0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
75% of IWRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high level of IWR (100%) gave the best values for all traits under study without significant differences when compared with 75% of IWR for some traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein percentage increased at 50% IWR in both seasons.

Treatment
50% IWRe0
Outcome
protein %e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protein % which increased with addition of the lowest level (50% IWR) in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1348 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

40 kg P2O5 /fed. gave the highest results for studied characters.

Treatment
40 or 60 kg P2O5 /fed.e0
Outcome
all studied characterse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of phosphorus at rates of 40 or 60 kg P2O5 /fed. exhibited the highest results for all studied characters in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

60 kg P2O5 /fed. gave the highest results for studied characters.

Treatment
60 kg P2O5 /fed.e0
Outcome
all studied characterse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of phosphorus at rates of 40 or 60 kg P2O5 /fed. exhibited the highest results for all studied characters in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best growth and yield combinations used 100% IWR with high phosphorus rates.

Treatment
100 % of IWRe0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best combinations treatments for growth and yield were supplying cowpea plants with 100 % of IWR and fertilizing the highest two rates of phosphorus (40 or 60 kg P2O5/fed. for all traits, followed by the medium level (75% of IWR) with the both high rates of P2O5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1751 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 50 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

irrigation · quality: protein · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.