Abstract
In a field experiment, interaction effects of applied Ca, Mg and K on yield and quality of tomato and soil nutrient levels was studied in Alfisols of Karnataka. The results showed application of Mg enhanced fruit yield up to 100 kg Mg ha-1 and decreased at higher levels of Mg. The application of Ca also enhanced the yield of tomato but their combined application at different levels had negative effect of one on the other. The results indicated that optimum combination of Mg and Ca was 100 and 250 kg ha-1 respectively for obtaining higher yield in tomato. Soil P content enhanced with application of both Ca and Mg. However, applied Ca and Mg showed significant negative effect on both soil and K content. Interaction effect was however, non-significant on soil pH, EC, OC and Soil N content.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Magnesium increased tomato fruit yield through 100 kg Mg ha-1.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- application of Mge0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 100 kg Mg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of Mg enhanced fruit yield up to 100 kg Mg ha-1”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato fruit yield decreased at higher magnesium levels.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Mge0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde1
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“decreased at higher levels of Mg.”
e1“application of Mg enhanced fruit yield up to 100 kg Mg ha-1 and decreased at higher levels of Mg.”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium application enhanced tomato yield.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- application of Cae0
- Outcome
- yield of tomatoe0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of Ca also enhanced the yield of tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined calcium and magnesium applications negatively affected each other’s effect on tomato yield.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- combined applicatione0
- Outcome
- negative effect of one on the othere0
- Direction
- negativee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“their combined application at different levels had negative effect of one on the other.”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The optimum yield combination was 100 kg ha-1 magnesium and 250 kg ha-1 calcium.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- 100 and 250 kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- optimum combination of Mg and Cae0
- Direction
- highere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“optimum combination of Mg and Ca was 100 and 250 kg ha-1 respectively for obtaining higher yield in tomato.”
Claim · model-written summary
Both calcium and magnesium application enhanced soil phosphorus.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- application of both Ca and Mge0
- Outcome
- Soil P contente0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soil P content enhanced with application of both Ca and Mg.”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Applied calcium and magnesium had a significant negative effect on soil potassium content.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- applied Ca and Mge0
- Outcome
- K contente0
- Direction
- negativee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“applied Ca and Mg showed significant negative effect on both soil and K content.”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The calcium-magnesium interaction was nonsignificant for soil pH, EC and OC.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Interactione0
- Outcome
- soil pH, EC, OCe0
- Direction
- non-significante0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Interaction effect was however, non-significant on soil pH, EC, OC and Soil N content.”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The calcium-magnesium interaction was nonsignificant for soil nitrogen content.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Interactione0
- Outcome
- Soil N contente0
- Direction
- non-significante0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Interaction effect was however, non-significant on soil pH, EC, OC and Soil N content.”
t0“Tomato”
The same questions in other papers
magnesium atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- negative
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →calcium atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
75 papers more in this group
See all 79 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.