Paper · 2019 · Agronomía Colombiana

Physiological performance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under agricultural climatic conditions in Boyaca, Colombia

Miguel Garcia-Parra; Jose García-Molano; Yuli Deaquiz-Oyola

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) is native to South America; it is characterized by its high nutrient contents and high adaptation capacity to diverse edapho-climatic conditions, which highlights it´s genetic variability expressed as multiple physiological and phenological responses. The objective of this research was to evaluate the physiological response and proximal composition of the grain to three types of fertilization under the environmental conditions of the municipality of Oicata (Boyaca, Colombia) located at 2,875 m a.s.l. The white Soracá variety was planted using a completely randomized design with four treatments and four replicates. It was observed that the fertilization sources have an effect on the physiological and phenological behavior, mainly on the number of leaves, length of stem and chlorophyll content. The reproductive stage and the proximal composition of seeds changed, which is attributed to the application of mineral organic fertilizer that improves the production of quinoa grains, while N-P-K contribution shows greater growth and vegetable development, but less yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization sources affected quinoa leaf number, stem length and chlorophyll content.

Treatment
fertilization sourcese0
Outcome
number of leaves, length of stem and chlorophyll contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization sources have an effect on the physiological and phenological behavior, mainly on the number of leaves, length of stem and chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reproductive stage changed under fertilization.

Organ / stage
reproductive stagee0
Outcome
reproductive stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reproductive stage and the proximal composition of seeds changed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed proximal composition changed under fertilization.

Organ / stage
seedse0
Outcome
proximal composition of seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reproductive stage and the proximal composition of seeds changed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral organic fertilizer improved quinoa grain production.

Treatment
mineral organic fertilizere0
Outcome
production of quinoa grainse0
Direction
improvese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of mineral organic fertilizer that improves the production of quinoa grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-P-K contribution produced greater growth and vegetable development.

Treatment
N-P-K contributione0
Outcome
growth and vegetable developmente0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N-P-K contribution shows greater growth and vegetable development, but less yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-P-K contribution produced less yield.

Treatment
N-P-K contributione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N-P-K contribution shows greater growth and vegetable development, but less yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–63 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.