Paper · 2019 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Nitrogen fertilization rates in a subtropical peach orchard: effects on tree vigor and fruit quality

Zilfina Rubio Ames; Jeffrey K Brecht; Mercy A Olmstead

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
28
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Nitrogen is a key component of crop production and is commonly related to increases in yield and fruit size. The N fertilization rates used for low‐chill peach cultivars were adapted from other peach production regions, where environmental and soil conditions are different. The growth and production as well as the effect on fruit physical and compositional attributes of two low‐chill peach cultivars – ‘TropicBeauty’ (TB) and ‘UFSharp’ (UFS) – with five different N fertilization rates (0 (N0), 45 (N1), 90 (N2), 179 (N3) and 269 (N4) kg ha −1 applied each year from 2011 to 2017) were examined. RESULTS Peach trees under higher N rates had higher pruning weights compared to the lower N0 or N1 rates. Yield was only affected in 2017 for the two cultivars tested. Physical attributes were inconsistently affected by N. Fruit from the higher N rates had lower a * value (more green) than fruit from the trees under low or zero N. While fruit firmness was not affected by N, fruit from trees under zero/low N had higher total soluble solids in some years. CONCLUSION Considering that N is recycled in the trees, being retained and reused each season to resume growth, it is important to address peach orchard fertilization based on peach tree N status. The results of this experiment show that an increase in N beyond what is required for tree maintenance does not increase yield. In addition, reducing N does not strongly affect fruit quality, although the color and soluble solids results suggest that lower N rates may advance fruit maturation. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen rates increased pruning weight versus lower N0 or N1 rates.

Treatment
higher N ratese0
Outcome
pruning weightse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
lower N0 or N1 ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Peach trees under higher N rates had higher pruning weights compared to the lower N0 or N1 rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen affected yield only in 2017 for both tested cultivars.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
Yielde0
Qualifier
only affected in 2017 for the two cultivars testede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield was only affected in 2017 for the two cultivars tested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen inconsistently affected physical fruit attributes.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
Physical attributese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Physical attributes were inconsistently affected by N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen rates lowered fruit a star color value relative to low or zero nitrogen.

Treatment
higher N ratese0
Outcome
a * valuee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
low or zero Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit from the higher N rates had lower a * value (more green) than fruit from the trees under low or zero N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–951 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen did not affect fruit firmness.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruit firmness was not affected by N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero or low nitrogen gave higher total soluble solids in some years.

Treatment
zero/low Ne0
Outcome
total soluble solidse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in some yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruit from trees under zero/low N had higher total soluble solids in some years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen beyond tree maintenance requirements did not increase yield.

Treatment
an increase in N beyond what is required for tree maintenancee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
does not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“an increase in N beyond what is required for tree maintenance does not increase yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing nitrogen did not strongly affect fruit quality.

Treatment
reducing Ne0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
does not strongly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“reducing N does not strongly affect fruit quality, although the color and soluble solids results suggest that lower N rates may advance fruit maturation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1568 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower nitrogen rates may advance fruit maturation.

Treatment
lower N ratese0
Outcome
fruit maturatione0
Direction
may advancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“reducing N does not strongly affect fruit quality, although the color and soluble solids results suggest that lower N rates may advance fruit maturation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1568 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend basing orchard fertilization on peach tree nitrogen status.

Outcome
peach orchard fertilization based on peach tree N statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“it is important to address peach orchard fertilization based on peach tree N status.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1273 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.