Paper · 2019 · Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research

RESPONSE OF WHEAT PLANTS TO DIFFERENT ORGANIC EXTRACTS UNDER SANDY SOIL CONDITIONS

Amera Sabri; I. Mohamed; A. Nasrallah; et al.

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted under greenhouse condition at the Experimental Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Egypt to investigate spraying with different organic extracts, Moringa leaves extract (MLE); Alge extract (AE); Yeast extract (YE) and Cabbage pollen flowers extract (CPFE) on grains and straw yields, photosynthetic pigments and nutrient uptake of wheat grown on a sandy soil taken from El-Khattara county, Sharkia Governorate, Egypt. Results showed that spraying with different organic extracts significantly increased yield, protein content, photosynthetic pigments and nutrient uptake of N,P,K,Fe,Mn,Zn,and Cu as compared to untreated plants. Spraying with MLE was of most positive effect and caused an increase of all parameters i.e., straw and grain yields, biological yield, protein content, NPK, Fe, Zn, Cu an Mn-uptake of wheat plants compared to other extracts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying with organic extracts significantly increased yield, protein content and photosynthetic pigments of wheat compared with untreated plants in a greenhouse pot experiment

Treatment
spraying with different organic extractse1
Outcome
yield, protein content, photosynthetic pigmentse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
untreated plantse1
Setting
greenhouse conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF WHEAT PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“A pot experiment was conducted under greenhouse condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that spraying with different organic extracts significantly increased yield, protein content, photosynthetic pigments and nutrient uptake of N,P,K,Fe,Mn,Zn,and Cu as compared to untreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying with organic extracts significantly increased nutrient uptake of N, P, K, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu in wheat compared with untreated plants

Treatment
spraying with different organic extractse1
Outcome
nutrient uptake of N,P,K,Fe,Mn,Zn,and Cue1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
untreated plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF WHEAT PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that spraying with different organic extracts significantly increased yield, protein content, photosynthetic pigments and nutrient uptake of N,P,K,Fe,Mn,Zn,and Cu as compared to untreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moringa leaves extract spraying caused the largest increase of straw and grain yields, biological yield, protein content, NPK, Fe, Zn, Cu and Mn uptake of wheat compared with other extracts

Treatment
Moringa leaves extract (MLE)e2
Outcome
straw and grain yields, biological yield, protein content, NPK, Fe, Zn, Cu an Mn-uptakee3
Direction
increasee3
Comparator
other extractse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF WHEAT PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e2

“Moringa leaves extract (MLE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–219 · show in text ↑
e3

“Spraying with MLE was of most positive effect and caused an increase of all parameters i.e., straw and grain yields, biological yield, protein content, NPK, Fe, Zn, Cu an Mn-uptake of wheat plants compared to other extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–897 · show in text ↑

botanical · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

botanical · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 40 positive, 1 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 70 positive, 2 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.