Paper · 2019 · Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental

Application methods of Azospirillum brasilense in first- and second-crop corn

Rita de C. F. Alvarez; Jamile Benetão; Gustavo R. Barzotto; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigated whether inoculation of Azospirillum brasilense in the seeds or sowing furrow could reduce the need for nitrogen fertilizer application in the corn grown in the first and second crop harvest. The experiments were conducted, in the municipality of Chapadão do Sul, MS, Brazil, in the first crop harvest (2014/2015) and in the second crop harvest (2016). The early maturity hybrids CD 384 HX and P3132H were used in the first and in the second harvest corn, respectively. In both experiments, the experimental design was the randomized blocks with eight treatments and three repetitions. At the silking (R1 stage), the leaf N concentration, relative chlorophyll index and nitrate reductase activity were measured, at the physiological maturity (R6 stage), the plant height, first ear insertion height, one hundred grain mass, grain yield and grain N concentration were measured. In the first crop harvest, the application of Azospirillum brasilense at the sowing furrow resulted in higher N concentration and relative chlorophyll index in corn leaves, while the inoculation of A. brasilense in the seeds provided higher N concentration in the grains. The nitrate reductase activity in corn leaves was lower when inoculation was performed. In the second crop harvest, the inoculation did not affected the N concentration in the leaves and in the grains, the relative chlorophyll index and the growth of corn plants. Inoculation in the sowing furrow associated with the application of 20 kg N ha-1 at sowing and 120 kg N ha-1 at topdressing resulted in lower nitrate reductase activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow Azospirillum application increased corn leaf nitrogen concentration and relative chlorophyll index in the first crop.

Treatment
application of Azospirillum brasilense at the sowing furrowe0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
N concentration and relative chlorophyll index in corn leavese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first crop harvest, the application of Azospirillum brasilense at the sowing furrow resulted in higher N concentration and relative chlorophyll index in corn leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with A. brasilense increased grain nitrogen concentration in the first crop.

Treatment
inoculation of A. brasilense in the seedse0
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
N concentration in the grainse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inoculation of A. brasilense in the seeds provided higher N concentration in the grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1180 · show in text ↑
e1

“the corn grown in the first and second crop harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation lowered corn leaf nitrate reductase activity.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
nitrate reductase activity in corn leavese0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrate reductase activity in corn leaves was lower when inoculation was performed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1268 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation of Azospirillum brasilense in the seeds or sowing furrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second harvest inoculation did not affect leaf and grain nitrogen concentration or relative chlorophyll index.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
N concentration in the leaves and in the grains, the relative chlorophyll indexe0
Direction
did not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the second crop harvest, the inoculation did not affected the N concentration in the leaves and in the grains, the relative chlorophyll index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1413 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation of Azospirillum brasilense in the seeds or sowing furrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–109 · show in text ↑
e2

“the corn grown in the first and second crop harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second harvest inoculation did not affect corn growth.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
growth of corn plantse0
Direction
did not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the second crop harvest, the inoculation did not affected the N concentration in the leaves and in the grains, the relative chlorophyll index and the growth of corn plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1444 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation of Azospirillum brasilense in the seeds or sowing furrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow inoculation with nitrogen application lowered nitrate reductase activity in the second harvest.

Treatment
Inoculation in the sowing furrow associated with the application of 20 kg N ha-1 at sowing and 120 kg N ha-1 at topdressinge0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
nitrate reductase activitye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation in the sowing furrow associated with the application of 20 kg N ha-1 at sowing and 120 kg N ha-1 at topdressing resulted in lower nitrate reductase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1614 · show in text ↑
e1

“Azospirillum brasilense in first- and second-crop corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–77 · show in text ↑
e2

“corn plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1443 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum brasilense · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Azospirillum brasilense · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

inoculation · Azospirillum brasilense · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

39 papers: 30 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 28 positive, 15 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 288 positive, 18 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.