Paper · 2019 · Bioscience Journal

Saline stress effect on cowpea beans growth under biofertilizer correction

Ednangelo Duarte Pereira; Albanise Barbosa Marinho; Elísia Gomes Ramos; et al.

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

New strategies to increase growth and food crops productivity in saline soils are priorities in the research. The experiment was carried out in a pot to investigate the growth of cowpea cv. Canapu in response to saline stress under the correction of a mixed biofertilizer. Five irrigation water salinity levels and three doses of the mixed biofertilizer were tested, with four replicates at each level. The increase in salinity level resulted in reductions in stem diameter, leaves number, shoot biomass and roots. The mixed biofertilizer use was able to minimize the effect of salinity in all analyzed variables, improving the cowpea growth and development, protecting from saline stress negative impacts. In addition, the mixed biofertilizer use may be an option to improve crop growth and productivity in salt affected soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity reduced stem diameter, leaf number, shoot biomass and roots.

Material
Canapue1
Treatment
increase in salinity levele0
Outcome
stem diameter, leaves number, shoot biomass and rootse0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in salinity level resulted in reductions in stem diameter, leaves number, shoot biomass and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–513 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea cv. Canapu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed biofertilizer mitigated salinity effects across analyzed growth variables.

Treatment
mixed biofertilizer usee0
Outcome
cowpea growth and developmente0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mixed biofertilizer use was able to minimize the effect of salinity in all analyzed variables, improving the cowpea growth and development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–657 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors propose mixed biofertilizer for salt-affected crop production.

Outcome
mixed biofertilizer usee0
Qualifier
salt affected soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mixed biofertilizer use may be an option to improve crop growth and productivity in salt affected soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–827 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea cv. Canapu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–196 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

63 papers: 6 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 92 positive, 10 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.