Paper · 2005 · Mağallaẗ zirāʿaẗ al-rāfidayn

EFFECT OF Fusarium solani, Rhizobium leguminosarum, BENOMYL AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON CERTAIN CHARACTERS OF LENTIL

J. M. Ahmed

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of seed inoculation with Rhizobium leguminosarum, Biavar viciae, seed treatment with benomyl, nitrogen fertilization and Fusarium solani (Mart.)Synder et Hansen on three lentil (Lens culinaris medic) cultivars were studied. In the presence of mixed inoculum (3 isolates) of the pathogen, the lentil cultivar IPA-98 was more resistant than IPA-2000 and Barka. It was superior into response to inoculation with a mixture of three races of R. leguminosarum and nitrogen fertilization in addition to into high production. Nitrogen fertilization decreased severity and improved plant growth, including production of three lentil cultivars, lentil yield and number of root nodules were increased when seeds were inoculated with R. leguminosarum. Yield increase and improvement of studied characters were recorded in the treatment which involved nitrogen fertilization, seed dusting with benomyl and inoculation with Rhizobium bacteria. This study constitutes the first of its kind, in which the effect of these factors on three cultivars was recorded in Iraq.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPA-98 was more resistant to Fusarium than IPA-2000 and Barka.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Material
IPA-98e0
Interactor
Fusarium solaniFusarium solanie1pathogen
Outcome
resistante0
Direction
more resistante0
Comparator
IPA-2000 and Barkae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the presence of mixed inoculum (3 isolates) of the pathogen, the lentil cultivar IPA-98 was more resistant than IPA-2000 and Barka.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–369 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium solani (Mart.)Synder et Hansen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPA-98 responded better to rhizobial inoculation and nitrogen fertilization and produced more.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Material
IPA-98e1
Interactor
R. leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont
Outcome
superior into response to inoculation with a mixture of three races of R. leguminosarum and nitrogen fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was superior into response to inoculation with a mixture of three races of R. leguminosarum and nitrogen fertilization in addition to into high production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–528 · show in text ↑
e1

“the lentil cultivar IPA-98 was more resistant than IPA-2000 and Barka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization decreased disease severity in lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
severitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilization decreased severity and improved plant growth, including production of three lentil cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization improved lentil growth and production.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
plant growth, including productione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilization decreased severity and improved plant growth, including production of three lentil cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobial seed inoculation increased lentil yield and nodule number.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
seeds were inoculated with R. leguminosarume0
Interactor
R. leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont
Outcome
lentil yield and number of root nodulese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lentil yield and number of root nodules were increased when seeds were inoculated with R. leguminosarum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nitrogen, benomyl and rhizobial treatment increased yield and improved studied characters.

Taxon
LENTILLens culinarist0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilization, seed dusting with benomyl and inoculation with Rhizobium bacteriae0
Interactor
Rhizobium bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
Yield increase and improvement of studied characterse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield increase and improvement of studied characters were recorded in the treatment which involved nitrogen fertilization, seed dusting with benomyl and inoculation with Rhizobium bacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–940 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium leguminosarum · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Rhizobium · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

inoculation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

69 papers: 65 positive, 4 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

fertilization · disease · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.