Paper · 2011 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

RESPONSE OF CANOLA PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY TO BIO- ORGANIC AND INORGANIC N – FERTILIZERS

M. E. Ali; A. I. Fathi; O. H. Mohamed; et al.

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Ismailia Agricultural Research Station during the two growing seasons of 2008-09 and 2009-10, to study the separate application of biofertilizers, organic manure (0, 5, and 10 tons/fed) and mineral N-fertilizer (0, 40, 60, and 80 kg N/fed) and their combined application on plant growth, yield and its components, seed quality (oil and protein content) of canola plants (c.v. Serw 4). Split-spilt plot design with three replicates was used. Results indicated that the individual application of biofertilizer, organic manure (10 ton/fed) and N-fertilizer at rate 80 kg N/fed caused 5.1 and 4.9 %, 18.5 and 16.6% and 40 and 40.3 % in seed yield during two seasons, respectively over control. Likewise, the interaction among the used levels of mineral N-fertilizer and bio-organic fertilizer revealed significant effect in both studied seasons for all investigated characters of canola plants. In this respect, it is worthy to note that the treatment of 80 kg N/fed of the recommended dose of N did not statistically differ from that of 40 kg N/fed of N fertilizer plus biofertilizer and 10 tons/fed compost manure. As for seed quality of canola, it was also found that protein content was increased by application of bio, organic, and inorganic N-fertilizer. However oil content was decreased by nitrogen application but it was increased with addition of biofertilizer and compost manure. Seed protein and oil content were significantly increased by the integrated fertilizers applications. This mean that inoculated seed of canola plant with biofertilizer containing nitrogen fixer bacteria plus addition of compost manure at 10 ton/fed., substitute half of the recommended dose from the used mineral nitrogen fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer increased seed yield by 5.1 and 4.9% over control across two seasons.

Treatment
biofertilizere0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
5.1 and 4.9 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the individual application of biofertilizer, organic manure (10 ton/fed) and N-fertilizer at rate 80 kg N/fed caused 5.1 and 4.9 %, 18.5 and 16.6% and 40 and 40.3 % in seed yield during two seasons, respectively over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure at 10 ton/fed increased seed yield by 18.5 and 16.6% over control.

Treatment
organic manure (10 ton/fed)e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
18.5 and 16.6%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the individual application of biofertilizer, organic manure (10 ton/fed) and N-fertilizer at rate 80 kg N/fed caused 5.1 and 4.9 %, 18.5 and 16.6% and 40 and 40.3 % in seed yield during two seasons, respectively over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer at 80 kg N/fed increased seed yield by 40 and 40.3% over control.

Treatment
N-fertilizer at rate 80 kg N/fede0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
40 and 40.3 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the individual application of biofertilizer, organic manure (10 ton/fed) and N-fertilizer at rate 80 kg N/fed caused 5.1 and 4.9 %, 18.5 and 16.6% and 40 and 40.3 % in seed yield during two seasons, respectively over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral and bio-organic fertilizer interactions significantly affected all investigated canola characters in both seasons.

Treatment
mineral N-fertilizer and bio-organic fertilizere0
Outcome
all investigated characterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the interaction among the used levels of mineral N-fertilizer and bio-organic fertilizer revealed significant effect in both studied seasons for all investigated characters of canola plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

80 kg N/fed did not statistically differ from 40 kg N/fed plus biofertilizer and compost manure.

Treatment
80 kg N/fede0
Outcome
did not statistically differe0
Direction
did not statistically differe0
Comparator
40 kg N/fed of N fertilizer plus biofertilizer and 10 tons/fed compost manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment of 80 kg N/fed of the recommended dose of N did not statistically differ from that of 40 kg N/fed of N fertilizer plus biofertilizer and 10 tons/fed compost manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer increased canola seed protein content.

Treatment
bioe0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As for seed quality of canola, it was also found that protein content was increased by application of bio, organic, and inorganic N-fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer increased canola seed protein content.

Treatment
organice0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As for seed quality of canola, it was also found that protein content was increased by application of bio, organic, and inorganic N-fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic N fertilizer increased canola seed protein content.

Treatment
inorganic N-fertilizere0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As for seed quality of canola, it was also found that protein content was increased by application of bio, organic, and inorganic N-fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application decreased oil content.

Treatment
nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However oil content was decreased by nitrogen application but it was increased with addition of biofertilizer and compost manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer increased oil content.

Treatment
biofertilizere0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However oil content was decreased by nitrogen application but it was increased with addition of biofertilizer and compost manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost manure increased oil content.

Treatment
compost manuree0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However oil content was decreased by nitrogen application but it was increased with addition of biofertilizer and compost manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated fertilizers significantly increased seed protein and oil content.

Treatment
integrated fertilizers applicationse0
Outcome
Seed protein and oil contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed protein and oil content were significantly increased by the integrated fertilizers applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1528 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer seed inoculation and compost manure can substitute half the recommended mineral nitrogen dose.

Treatment
biofertilizer containing nitrogen fixer bacteria plus addition of compost manure at 10 ton/fed.e0
Interactor
nitrogen fixer bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
substitute half of the recommended dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This mean that inoculated seed of canola plant with biofertilizer containing nitrogen fixer bacteria plus addition of compost manure at 10 ton/fed., substitute half of the recommended dose from the used mineral nitrogen fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1760 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

63 papers: 42 positive, 21 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

nitrogen · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

64 papers: 31 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

cultivation system · quality: protein · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

inoculation · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 44 positive, 3 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

239 papers: 198 positive, 41 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

235 papers more in this group

See all 239 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

336 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

374 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.