Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Compared with sidebanding, seedrow placement at 80 and 120 kg N ha-1 generally reduced emergence, yield and nitrogen uptake.

A claim from Placement, rate and source of N, seedrow opener and seeding depth effects on canola production · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with sidebanding, seedrow placement at 80 and 120 kg N ha-1 generally reduced emergence, yield and nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
seedrow placement of 80 and 120 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
emergence, yield and N uptakee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
sidebandinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to sidebanding, seedrow placement of 80 and 120 kg N ha -1 generally reduced emergence, yield and N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1099
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83

Title

Placement, rate and source of N, seedrow opener and seeding depth effects on canola production

S. S Malhi; K. S Gill Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2004. doi:10.4141/p03-174

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-9f5f0f1048bb91e7ffdd51a89256a797c8a71849658b07fdee9fa93a14c1803e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

239 papers: 198 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this claim · 198 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

230 papers more in this group

See all 239 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.