Paper · 2019 · Plants

Sustainability Perspectives of Vigna unguiculata L. Walp. Cultivation under No Tillage and Water Stress Conditions

Lorenzo Guzzetti; Andrea Fiorini; Davide Panzeri; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
31
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nowadays, agriculture is facing the great challenge of climate change which puts the productivity of the crops in peril due to unpredictable rain patterns and water shortages, especially in the developing world. Besides productivity, nutritional values of the yields of these crops may also be affected, especially under low mechanization and the low water availability conditions of the developing world. Conservation agriculture (CA) is a topic of emerging interest due to the provision of adequate yields and reduced environmental impact, such as greenhouse gas emissions, by being based on three main principles: minimum soil disturbance (reduced or no tillage), cover crop maintenance, and crop rotation. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of CA management on the growth performance and the nutritional profile of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp), a pulse of African origin, commonly known as black eye bean under field conditions. A field experiment was designed to assess the effect of conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) combined with the usage of a set of cover crops, coupled to normal and deficient water regimes. Cowpea was revealed to be able to grow and yield comparably at each level of the treatment tested, with a better ability to face water exhaustion under CA management. After a faster initial growth phase in CT plots, the level of adaptability of this legume to NT was such that growth performances improved significantly with respect to CT plots. The flowering rate was higher and earlier in CT conditions, while in NT it was slower but longer-lasting. The leafy photosynthetic rate and the nutritional profile of beans were slightly influenced by tillage management: only total starch content was negatively affected in NT and watered plots while proteins and aminoacids did not show any significant variation. Furthermore, significantly higher carbon and nitrogen concentration occurred in NT soils especially at the topmost (0–5 cm) soil horizon. These findings confirm the capability of CA to enrich soil superficial horizons and highlight that cowpea is a suitable crop to be grown under sustainable CA management. This practice could be pivotal to preserve soils and to save agronomical costs without losing a panel of nutrients that are important to the human diet. Due to its great protein and aminoacidic composition, V. unguiculata is a good candidate for further cultivation in regions of the word facing deficiencies in the intake of such nutrients, such as the Mediterranean basins and Sub-Saharan countries.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea grew and yielded comparably across tested treatments.

Treatment
treatment testede0
Outcome
grow and yield comparablye0
Direction
comparablye0
Comparator
each levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea was revealed to be able to grow and yield comparably at each level of the treatment tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea faced water exhaustion better under conservation agriculture management.

Treatment
CA managemente0
Outcome
ability to face water exhaustione0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a better ability to face water exhaustion under CA management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1314 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial cowpea growth was faster in conventional tillage plots.

Treatment
CT plotse0
Outcome
initial growth phasee0
Direction
fastere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After a faster initial growth phase in CT plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1363 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea growth performance significantly improved under no tillage relative to conventional tillage.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
growth performancese0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
CT plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adaptability of this legume to NT was such that growth performances improved significantly with respect to CT plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering rate was higher and earlier under conventional tillage.

Treatment
CT conditionse0
Outcome
flowering ratee0
Direction
higher and earliere0
Comparator
NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The flowering rate was higher and earlier in CT conditions, while in NT it was slower but longer-lasting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1600 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering was slower but longer lasting under no tillage.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
flowering ratee2
Direction
slower but longer-lastinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in NT it was slower but longer-lasting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1599 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–865 · show in text ↑
e2

“flowering rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf photosynthetic rate was slightly influenced by tillage management.

Treatment
tillage managemente0
Outcome
leafy photosynthetic ratee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leafy photosynthetic rate and the nutritional profile of beans were slightly influenced by tillage management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1714 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total starch content was negatively affected in no tillage and watered plots.

Treatment
NT and watered plotse0
Outcome
total starch contente0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total starch content was negatively affected in NT and watered plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1789 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein and amino acid contents showed no significant variation.

Treatment
tillage managemente2
Outcome
proteins and aminoacidse0
Direction
did not show any significant variatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proteins and aminoacids did not show any significant variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1796–1858 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–865 · show in text ↑
e2

“tillage management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage soils had significantly higher carbon concentration, especially in the top 0–5 cm.

Treatment
NT soilse0
Outcome
carbone0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
topmost (0–5 cm) soil horizone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher carbon and nitrogen concentration occurred in NT soils especially at the topmost (0–5 cm) soil horizon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–1996 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage soils had significantly higher nitrogen concentration, especially in the top 0–5 cm.

Treatment
NT soilse0
Outcome
nitrogen concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
topmost (0–5 cm) soil horizone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher carbon and nitrogen concentration occurred in NT soils especially at the topmost (0–5 cm) soil horizon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–1996 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–865 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend cowpea cultivation under sustainable conservation agriculture.

Outcome
grown under sustainable CA managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea is a suitable crop to be grown under sustainable CA management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2097–2166 · show in text ↑

tillage · molecular: metabolites · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tillage · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.