Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Integrated management of major diseases of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)

Nayan Kishor Adhikary; Rambilash Mallick

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Among fungal diseases, stem and root rot, Alternaria leaf spot and Cercospora leaf spot were become major constraints for cultivation of sesame in South 24-Parganas district of West Bengal, India. Considering the fact, the following investigation was carried out for this pathological problem. Field trials conducted on integrated disease management practices to combat major diseases and to increase the seed yield of sesame during summer, 2018 and 2019. Minimum incidence of stem and root rot (8.8% and 11.2%) with higher yield of 527 kg/ha and 577 kg/ha were recorded in summer, 2018 and 2019 with application of organic amendment with FYM and neem cake @ 150 kg/ha (1:1, T4). In case of foliar diseases of sesame, applications of FYM + NPK @ 60:30:30 (1:1, T3) was found to be significantly effective by recording minimum incidence of Alternaria leaf spot (6.3% and 8.4%) and Cercospora leaf spot (4.2% and 5.3%) coupled with maximum yield (512 kg/ha and 541 kg/ha) with higher cost benefit (C:B) ratio in summer, 2018 and 2019.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic amendment with FYM and neem cake at 150 kg/ha (T4) gave the minimum incidence of stem and root rot in sesame, 8.8% in 2018 and 11.2% in 2019.

Treatment
organic amendment with FYM and neem cake @ 150 kg/ha (1:1, T4)e0
Outcome
incidence of stem and root rote0
Direction
Minimume0
Value
8.8% and 11.2%e0
Qualifier
summer, 2018 and 2019e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“Minimum incidence of stem and root rot (8.8% and 11.2%) with higher yield of 527 kg/ha and 577 kg/ha were recorded in summer, 2018 and 2019 with application of organic amendment with FYM and neem cake @ 150 kg/ha (1:1, T4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same T4 treatment gave higher sesame yield, 527 kg/ha in 2018 and 577 kg/ha in 2019.

Treatment
organic amendment with FYM and neem cake @ 150 kg/ha (1:1, T4)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
527 kg/ha and 577 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“Minimum incidence of stem and root rot (8.8% and 11.2%) with higher yield of 527 kg/ha and 577 kg/ha were recorded in summer, 2018 and 2019 with application of organic amendment with FYM and neem cake @ 150 kg/ha (1:1, T4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM + NPK at 60:30:30 (T3) significantly reduced Alternaria leaf spot incidence to a minimum of 6.3% and 8.4% in the two years.

Treatment
FYM + NPK @ 60:30:30 (1:1, T3)e0
Interactor
AlternariaAlternariae0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of Alternaria leaf spote0
Direction
minimume0
Value
6.3% and 8.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria
Alternaria · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)http://phil.cdc.gov/phil_images/20030612/9/PHIL_3963_lores.jpg · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“applications of FYM + NPK @ 60:30:30 (1:1, T3) was found to be significantly effective by recording minimum incidence of Alternaria leaf spot (6.3% and 8.4%) and Cercospora leaf spot (4.2% and 5.3%) coupled with maximum yield (512 kg/ha and 541 kg/ha) with higher cost benefit (C:B) ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–1006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM + NPK at 60:30:30 (T3) coincided with maximum sesame yield, 512 kg/ha and 541 kg/ha in the two years.

Treatment
FYM + NPK @ 60:30:30 (1:1, T3)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
512 kg/ha and 541 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“applications of FYM + NPK @ 60:30:30 (1:1, T3) was found to be significantly effective by recording minimum incidence of Alternaria leaf spot (6.3% and 8.4%) and Cercospora leaf spot (4.2% and 5.3%) coupled with maximum yield (512 kg/ha and 541 kg/ha) with higher cost benefit (C:B) ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–1006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM + NPK at 60:30:30 (T3) gave a higher cost benefit (C:B) ratio.

Treatment
FYM + NPK @ 60:30:30 (1:1, T3)e0
Outcome
cost benefit (C:B) ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
higher cost benefit (C:B) ratioe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“applications of FYM + NPK @ 60:30:30 (1:1, T3) was found to be significantly effective by recording minimum incidence of Alternaria leaf spot (6.3% and 8.4%) and Cercospora leaf spot (4.2% and 5.3%) coupled with maximum yield (512 kg/ha and 541 kg/ha) with higher cost benefit (C:B) ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–1006 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results differ

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

organic · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

botanical · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · disease · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · disease · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.