Abstract
A field experiment was carried out during kharif season of 2016 and 2017 at an experimental farm of MACS Agharkar Research Institute, Pune, India to study the influence of foliar application of nutrient on growth, yield, economics, soil nutritional status and nutrient uptake of soybean crop. An experiment was laid out in randomized block design (RBD) comprising of three replications and nine treatments. Recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) was applied as basal application to all treatments. Seven treatments consisted of different doses of nutrients as foliar application at pod initiation stage. Water spray at pod initiation stage and RDF alone were treated as control. The results revealed that, growth attributes, nodulation and its weight, morpho-physiological parameters, yield and its attributes, nutritional parameters and economics significantly differed by various foliar nutrition treatments except control and RDF + water spray. RDF + Urea 2% (3098 kg ha-1) gave significantly higher seed yield over control (2704 kg ha-1) and RDF + water spray (2686 kg ha-1) but was at par with RDF + DAP 2% (3050 kg ha-1), RDF + MOP 0.5% (2992 kg ha-1) and RDF + Molybdenum 0.5% (2955 kg ha-1). The increase in seed yield with foliar application of 2% Urea along with RDF was 14.57% over control and 15.34% over RDF + water spray. Higher net returns (Rs. 49,006/- ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (2.23:1) was obtained in treatment RDF + Urea 2% followed by RDF + DAP 2% foliar spray. Availability of N, P and K was significantly higher with treatment RDF + Urea 2% foliar spray over control and RDF + water spray. N and P uptake by soybean plants was significantly higher in treatment RDF + 2% Urea over RDF + water spray and RDF alone (control).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar nutrition treatments significantly differed in growth, nodulation, physiology, yield, nutrition, and economics, except the control and water spray.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- various foliar nutrition treatmentse0
- Outcome
- growth attributes, nodulation and its weight, morpho-physiological parameterse0
- Comparator
- control and RDF + water spraye0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth attributes, nodulation and its weight, morpho-physiological parameters, yield and its attributes, nutritional parameters and economics significantly differed by various foliar nutrition treatments except control and RDF + water spray”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus 2% urea produced higher seed yield than control and RDF plus water spray.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- RDF + Urea 2%e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 3098 kg ha-1e0
- Qualifier
- 2704 kg ha-1e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“RDF + Urea 2% (3098 kg ha-1) gave significantly higher seed yield over control (2704 kg ha-1) and RDF + water spray (2686 kg ha-1)”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
The 2% urea treatment was statistically at par for seed yield with DAP, MOP, and molybdenum treatments.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- RDF + Urea 2%e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Comparator
- RDF + DAP 2%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“RDF + Urea 2% (3098 kg ha-1) gave significantly higher seed yield over control (2704 kg ha-1) and RDF + water spray (2686 kg ha-1) but was at par with RDF + DAP 2% (3050 kg ha-1), RDF + MOP 0.5% (2992 kg ha-1) and RDF + Molybdenum 0.5% (2955 kg ha-1)”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Urea treatment increased seed yield by 14.57% over control.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- foliar application of 2% Urea along with RDFe0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 14.57%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The increase in seed yield with foliar application of 2% Urea along with RDF was 14.57% over control”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Urea treatment increased seed yield by 15.34% over RDF plus water spray.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- foliar application of 2% Urea along with RDFe0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 15.34%e0
- Comparator
- RDF + water spraye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The increase in seed yield with foliar application of 2% Urea along with RDF was 14.57% over control and 15.34% over RDF + water spray”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus 2% urea yielded the higher net return of Rs. 49,006/- ha-1.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- RDF + Urea 2%e0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- Highere0
- Value
- Rs. 49,006/- ha-1e0
- Comparator
- RDF + DAP 2% foliar spraye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher net returns (Rs. 49,006/- ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (2.23:1) was obtained in treatment RDF + Urea 2% followed by RDF + DAP 2% foliar spray”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus 2% urea yielded a benefit to cost ratio of 2.23:1.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- RDF + Urea 2%e0
- Outcome
- benefit: cost ratioe0
- Value
- 2.23:1e0
- Comparator
- RDF + DAP 2% foliar spraye0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher net returns (Rs. 49,006/- ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (2.23:1) was obtained in treatment RDF + Urea 2% followed by RDF + DAP 2% foliar spray”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus 2% urea significantly raised soil N, P, and K availability over controls.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- RDF + Urea 2% foliar spraye0
- Outcome
- Availability of N, P and Ke0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- control and RDF + water spraye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Availability of N, P and K was significantly higher with treatment RDF + Urea 2% foliar spray over control and RDF + water spray”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus 2% urea significantly raised soybean N and P uptake over controls.
- Taxon
- soybean plantsGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- RDF + 2% Ureae0
- Outcome
- N and P uptakee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- RDF + water spray and RDF alone (control)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N and P uptake by soybean plants was significantly higher in treatment RDF + 2% Urea over RDF + water spray and RDF alone (control)”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
90 papers more in this group
See all 94 papers →application · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
306 papers more in this group
See all 310 papers →application · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
331 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
400 papers more in this group
See all 404 papers →nitrogen · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
317 papers in the same direction as this paper · 91 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
412 papers more in this group
See all 416 papers →fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
1,020 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
1,188 papers more in this group
See all 1,192 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.