Paper · 2020 · Agrarian Bulletin of the

An effective method for managing the production process of grapes using foliar nutrition in arid conditions of the North-Western Caspian

Elena Polukhina; M. Vlasenko

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Abstract. Scientific novelty and practical significance. The research area is relevant due to the fact that in viticulture the use of new water-soluble complex fertilizers in chelated form is not yet widespread due to their insufficient knowledge. In this regard, it became necessary to determine their influence on the basic vital processes of grape plants in arid conditions. The purpose of the research is to identify the effect of foliar nutrition by “Plantafol” and “Boroplus” fertilizers on economically valuable grape indicators in the arid conditions of the North-Western Caspian during irrigation. Methods. Experience is two-factor. Factor A – varieties: Kodryanka (early ripe), Rizamat (mid-ripening), Moskovskiy (late ripening). Factor B: option 1 – control (water treatment); option 2 – “Plantafol;” option 3 – “Boroplus”; option 4 – “Plantafol” + “Boroplus”. The experience was laid and statistical data processing was carried out according to the method of B. A. Dospekhov. The counts and observations were carried out according to the method of M. A. Lazarevskiy. The mass fraction of sugars and titratable acidity in the juice of berries was found by the method of biochemical study of plants A. I. Ermakova. The content of vitamin C in grapes was determined by the guidelines for determining the quality of plant products. Results. The maximum yield increase for all varieties was provided by the combined use of “Plantafol” and “Boroplus” fertilizers. The variety Kodryanka has 6.6 t/ha for control. The variety Rizamat has 6.7 t/ha for control. Foliar top dressing contributed to a significant increase in the mass fraction of sugars in all varieties. The use of “Boroplus” in its pure form and together with “Plantafol” positively affected the vitamin C content in berries. The sugar acid index of the varieties “Rizamat” (29.8) and Moskovskiy (28.1) had optimal values for the variant without the use of fertilizers, and the varieties Kodryanka (25.3) – for the variant with their combined use.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Plantafol and Boroplus gave the maximum yield increase across grape varieties.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
combined use of “Plantafol” and “Boroplus” fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum yield increase for all varieties was provided by the combined use of “Plantafol” and “Boroplus” fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1469 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control yield for Kodryanka was 6.6 t/ha.

Taxon
grapest0
Material
Kodryankae0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
yielde1
Value
6.6 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“The variety Kodryanka has 6.6 t/ha for control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1517 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum yield increase for all varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control yield for Rizamat was 6.7 t/ha.

Taxon
grapest0
Material
Rizamate0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
yielde1
Value
6.7 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“The variety Rizamat has 6.7 t/ha for control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1563 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum yield increase for all varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar top dressing significantly increased berry sugar mass fraction in all grape varieties.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
Foliar top dressinge0
Outcome
mass fraction of sugarse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar top dressing contributed to a significant increase in the mass fraction of sugars in all varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1670 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boroplus alone positively affected vitamin C content in grape berries.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
“Boroplus” in its pure forme0
Outcome
vitamin C content in berriese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The use of “Boroplus” in its pure form and together with “Plantafol” positively affected the vitamin C content in berries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1793 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boroplus with Plantafol positively affected vitamin C content in grape berries.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
together with “Plantafol”e0
Outcome
vitamin C content in berriese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The use of “Boroplus” in its pure form and together with “Plantafol” positively affected the vitamin C content in berries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1793 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rizamat had an optimal sugar acid index of 29.8 without fertilizer.

Taxon
grapest0
Material
Rizamate0
Treatment
without the use of fertilizerse0
Outcome
sugar acid indexe0
Value
29.8e0

Verbatim

e0

“The sugar acid index of the varieties “Rizamat” (29.8) and Moskovskiy (28.1) had optimal values for the variant without the use of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1794–1936 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moskovskiy had an optimal sugar acid index of 28.1 without fertilizer.

Taxon
grapest0
Material
Moskovskiye0
Treatment
without the use of fertilizerse0
Outcome
sugar acid indexe0
Value
28.1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The sugar acid index of the varieties “Rizamat” (29.8) and Moskovskiy (28.1) had optimal values for the variant without the use of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1794–1936 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kodryanka had an optimal sugar acid index of 25.3 under combined fertilizer use.

Taxon
grapest0
Material
Kodryankae0
Treatment
their combined usee0
Outcome
sugar acid indexe1
Value
25.3e0

Verbatim

e0

“the varieties Kodryanka (25.3) – for the variant with their combined use.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1942–2015 · show in text ↑
e1

“The sugar acid index of the varieties “Rizamat””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1794–1841 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.