Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2016-2017 at the Students' Instructional Farm of Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh to assess the “impact of fertility levels and biofertilizers on root architecture, yield and nutrient uptake by crop”. The experiment was comprised of 12 treatment combination in split plot design with three replications. The results showed that, application of 100% RDF significantly enhanced root parameters, yield and nutrient uptake over control plot. Among the different biofertilizers treatments, application of Rhizobium + PSB + PGPR had significant effect on root parameters and enhanced yield and nutrient uptake as compared to Rhizobium + PGPR. The combined application of 100% RDF with Rhizobium + PSB + PGPR resulted significantly higher yield of chickpea during rabi season.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
100% RDF significantly enhanced chickpea root parameters relative to control.
- Taxon
- Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- root parameterse0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Comparator
- control plote0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 100% RDF significantly enhanced root parameters, yield and nutrient uptake over control plot”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
100% RDF significantly enhanced chickpea yield relative to control.
- Taxon
- Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Comparator
- control plote0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 100% RDF significantly enhanced root parameters, yield and nutrient uptake over control plot”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
100% RDF significantly enhanced chickpea nutrient uptake relative to control.
- Taxon
- Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Comparator
- control plote0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 100% RDF significantly enhanced root parameters, yield and nutrient uptake over control plot”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium + PSB + PGPR significantly affected chickpea root parameters compared with Rhizobium + PGPR.
- Taxon
- Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- application of Rhizobium + PSB + PGPRe0
- Outcome
- root parameterse0
- Comparator
- Rhizobium + PGPRe0
RhizobiumNot reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of Rhizobium + PSB + PGPR had significant effect on root parameters and enhanced yield and nutrient uptake as compared to Rhizobium + PGPR”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium + PSB + PGPR enhanced chickpea yield compared with Rhizobium + PGPR.
- Taxon
- Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- application of Rhizobium + PSB + PGPRe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Comparator
- Rhizobium + PGPRe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of Rhizobium + PSB + PGPR had significant effect on root parameters and enhanced yield and nutrient uptake as compared to Rhizobium + PGPR”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium + PSB + PGPR enhanced chickpea nutrient uptake compared with Rhizobium + PGPR.
- Taxon
- Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- application of Rhizobium + PSB + PGPRe0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Comparator
- Rhizobium + PGPRe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of Rhizobium + PSB + PGPR had significant effect on root parameters and enhanced yield and nutrient uptake as compared to Rhizobium + PGPR”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined 100% RDF and Rhizobium + PSB + PGPR produced significantly higher chickpea yield.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- combined application of 100% RDF with Rhizobium + PSB + PGPRe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The combined application of 100% RDF with Rhizobium + PSB + PGPR resulted significantly higher yield of chickpea during rabi season.”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
116 papers more in this group
See all 120 papers →Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
213 papers more in this group
See all 217 papers →fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.