Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Nitrogen on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Rice under Aerobic Condition

Neha Nandan; D. K. Roy; Shashank Kumar; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was undertaken during kharif of the year 2016 at the Research Farm of Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa (Samastipur), Bihar. The experiment was conducted in split plot design having three levels of nitrogen in main plots (N1-120 kg N/ha, N2-140 kg N/ha and N3-160 kg N/ha,) and six weed management practices (W1- Pyrazosulfuron @ 25 g/ha (20 DAS), W2-Bispyribac sodium @ 25 g/ha (20 DAS), W3-Pyrazosulfuron @ 25g/ha + Bispyribac sodium @ 25g/ha (20 DAS), W4 Pendimethalin @ 1000g/ha (PE)+ W3 (20 DAS), W5-Weed free (2 Hand weeding at 20 & 40 DAS) and W6-Weedy check) in sub plots, replicated thrice with Abhishek as the test variety. Higher level of nitrogen i.e. 160 Kg/ha exhibited better expression in respect of growth and yield attributes than the other two levels and it was somehow also comparable to 140 kg N/ha. The better performance in terms of growth and yield attributed were reflected correspondingly in grain and straw yield however harvest index didn’t show any significant variation due to nitrogen treatments. Nutrient uptake by crop was higher in 160 kg N/ha than other two lower doses. Amongst the two lower doses of nitrogen, 140 kg N/ha had an edge over 120 kg N/ha. The most glaring part of results rested in its economic studies, wherein treatment with 160Kg N/ha fetched higher gross returns, net return and finally B:C ratio than other two doses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

160 Kg/ha nitrogen improved growth and yield attributes over lower rates.

Treatment
160 Kg/hae0
Outcome
growth and yield attributese0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
the other two levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher level of nitrogen i.e. 160 Kg/ha exhibited better expression in respect of growth and yield attributes than the other two levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen improved grain and straw yield.

Treatment
nitrogene1
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“The better performance in terms of growth and yield attributed were reflected correspondingly in grain and straw yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–982 · show in text ↑
e1

“Higher level of nitrogen i.e. 160 Kg/ha exhibited better expression in respect of growth and yield attributes than the other two levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index showed no significant variation across nitrogen treatments.

Treatment
nitrogen treatmentse0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
didn’t show any significant variatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“harvest index didn’t show any significant variation due to nitrogen treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop nutrient uptake was higher at 160 kg N/ha than at lower rates.

Treatment
160 kg N/hae0
Outcome
Nutrient uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other two lower dosese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nutrient uptake by crop was higher in 160 kg N/ha than other two lower doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

140 kg N/ha outperformed 120 kg N/ha.

Treatment
140 kg N/hae0
Outcome
had an edge overe0
Direction
had an edge overe0
Comparator
120 kg N/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“Amongst the two lower doses of nitrogen, 140 kg N/ha had an edge over 120 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

160Kg N/ha produced higher gross returns, net return and B:C ratio.

Treatment
160Kg N/hae0
Outcome
gross returns, net return and finally B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other two dosese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatment with 160Kg N/ha fetched higher gross returns, net return and finally B:C ratio than other two doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1414 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 81 positive, 16 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.