Paper · 2020 · Acta Agrobotanica

Zinc Biofortification in the Grains of Two Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties Through Fertilization

Shilpi Das; M. Jahiruddin; M. Rafiqul Islam; et al.

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We examined the effects of zinc (Zn) fertilization on wheat, focusing on yield and biofortification in the grains of two wheat varieties. Five Zn rates, i.e., 0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, and 6.0 kg ha−1 applied as ZnSO4·7H2O (23% Zn), and two wheat varieties, i.e., ‘BARI Gom-25’ and ‘BARI Gom-26,’ were used in the study. All plant characteristics, except 1,000-grain weight and plant height, i.e., tillers plant−1, spikes m−2, spike length, spikelets spike−1, and grains spike−1, were significantly influenced by Zn fertilization. Treatment with 3.0 kg Zn ha−1 (Zn3.0) produced the highest grain yield (3.90 t ha−1), which was statistically similar to Zn4.5 and Zn6.0 treatments. The control treatment (Zn0) produced the lowest grain yield (2.99 t ha−1). The concentrations of N, Zn, and Fe were significantly and positively influenced by Zn treatment. The crop varieties did not differ significantly in terms of N and Zn concentrations. However, the grain Fe concentration was remarkably higher in ‘BARI Gom-26’ than in ‘BARI Gom-25.’ The grain N and protein concentrations increased linearly with the Zn application rate. The grain Zn concentration increased with Zn application rates in a quadratic line, indicating that the concentration of Zn in wheat grain increased with Zn fertilization; however, it attained a maximum value in the Zn4.5 treatment, after which it declined with higher rate of Zn application. The application of Zn at the rate of 4.5 kg ha−1 resulted in the highest Zn fortification (39.7 µg g−1) in wheat grains, which was 17.1% higher than in the control treatment. The response curve showed that 4.62 kg ha−1 for ‘BARI Gom-25’ and 3.94 kg ha−1 for ‘BARI Gom-26’ were the optimum Zn rates for achieving higher wheat grain yield. However, 5.5 kg ha−1 was the optimum Zn rate for obtaining higher Zn fortification in wheat grains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc fertilization significantly influenced tillers, spikes, spike length, spikelets and grains per spike.

Treatment
Zn fertilizatione0
Outcome
tillers plant−1, spikes m−2, spike lengthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plant characteristics, except 1,000-grain weight and plant height, i.e., tillers plant−1, spikes m−2, spike length, spikelets spike−1, and grains spike−1, were significantly influenced by Zn fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc fertilization did not significantly influence thousand-grain weight or plant height.

Treatment
Zn fertilizatione0
Outcome
1,000-grain weight and plant heighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plant characteristics, except 1,000-grain weight and plant height, i.e., tillers plant−1, spikes m−2, spike length, spikelets spike−1, and grains spike−1, were significantly influenced by Zn fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3.0 kg Zn ha−1 treatment gave the highest wheat grain yield, 3.90 t ha−1, statistically similar to higher rates.

Treatment
3.0 kg Zn ha−1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.90 t ha−1e0
Comparator
Zn4.5 and Zn6.0 treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with 3.0 kg Zn ha−1 (Zn3.0) produced the highest grain yield (3.90 t ha−1), which was statistically similar to Zn4.5 and Zn6.0 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control yielded the lowest wheat grain yield, 2.99 t ha−1.

Treatment
control treatment (Zn0)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.99 t ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control treatment (Zn0) produced the lowest grain yield (2.99 t ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc treatment significantly increased grain nitrogen, zinc and iron concentrations.

Treatment
Zn treatmente0
Outcome
concentrations of N, Zn, and Fee0
Direction
positivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentrations of N, Zn, and Fe were significantly and positively influenced by Zn treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two wheat varieties did not differ significantly in nitrogen and zinc concentrations.

Material
crop varietiese0
Outcome
N and Zn concentrationse0
Direction
did not differ significantlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crop varieties did not differ significantly in terms of N and Zn concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BARI Gom-26 had higher grain iron than BARI Gom-25.

Material
BARI Gom-26e0
Outcome
grain Fe concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
BARI Gom-25e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain Fe concentration was remarkably higher in ‘BARI Gom-26’ than in ‘BARI Gom-25.’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain nitrogen and protein increased linearly with zinc application rate.

Treatment
Zn application ratee0
Outcome
grain N and protein concentrationse0
Direction
increased linearlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain N and protein concentrations increased linearly with the Zn application rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1115 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain zinc rose with zinc rate to Zn4.5 and declined at higher rates.

Treatment
Zn application ratese0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after which it declined with higher rate of Zn applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain Zn concentration increased with Zn application rates in a quadratic line, indicating that the concentration of Zn in wheat grain increased with Zn fertilization; however, it attained a maximum value in the Zn4.5 treatment, after which it declined with higher rate of Zn application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4.5 kg ha−1 zinc, grain zinc fortification was 39.7 µg g−1, 17.1% above control.

Treatment
Zn at the rate of 4.5 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
Zn fortificatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
39.7 µg g−1e0
Qualifier
17.1% highere0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of Zn at the rate of 4.5 kg ha−1 resulted in the highest Zn fortification (39.7 µg g−1) in wheat grains, which was 17.1% higher than in the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1583 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The modeled optimum zinc rate for BARI Gom-25 yield was 4.62 kg ha−1.

Material
BARI Gom-25e0
Outcome
optimum Zn rates for achieving higher wheat grain yielde0
Value
4.62 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response curve showed that 4.62 kg ha−1 for ‘BARI Gom-25’ and 3.94 kg ha−1 for ‘BARI Gom-26’ were the optimum Zn rates for achieving higher wheat grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1746 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The modeled optimum zinc rate for BARI Gom-26 yield was 3.94 kg ha−1.

Material
BARI Gom-26e0
Outcome
optimum Zn rates for achieving higher wheat grain yielde0
Value
3.94 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response curve showed that 4.62 kg ha−1 for ‘BARI Gom-25’ and 3.94 kg ha−1 for ‘BARI Gom-26’ were the optimum Zn rates for achieving higher wheat grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1746 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum zinc rate for grain zinc fortification was 5.5 kg ha−1.

Outcome
optimum Zn rate for obtaining higher Zn fortificatione0
Value
5.5 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“5.5 kg ha−1 was the optimum Zn rate for obtaining higher Zn fortification in wheat grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–1846 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.