Paper · 2020 · Bragantia

Role of nonproductive tillers as transient sinks of assimilates in wheat

Samuel Luiz Fioreze; Luiz Henrique Michelon; Thaís Lemos Turek; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Although source–sink relationships in wheat are well studied, the performance of tillers as transient sinks is still unclear, especially under stress conditions. Thus, this work aimed to study the yield relationships of wheat stems in contrasting genotypes as affected by tiller treatment under stress conditions. Two experiments were conducted under greenhouse conditions using BRS Guamirim (high tillering) and BRS Parrudo (low tillering) wheat cultivars. Four tillering treatments were applied on late tillers in the first growing season (2016) and three in the second (2017): (i) free-tillering, (ii) detillering, (iii) physical suppression (only in the first season) and (iv) “spikes removal”. The main stem and the first four emitted tillers were considered as primary tillers. Plants were submitted to drought (2016) and defoliation stress (2017) at preanthesis. Intraspecific competition among tillers increased under drought stress conditions and decreased the plant performance. Nonproductive late tillers do not improve the performance of primary tillers of wheat plants under drought stress, mainly in high-tillering cultivars. The reduction on the thousand grain weight of only ‘Parrudo’ detillered plants indicates that assimilate remobilization from late tillers to primary tillers and main stem seems to be more effective in low-tillering cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intraspecific competition among wheat tillers increased under drought stress.

Treatment
drought stress conditionse0
Outcome
Intraspecific competition among tillerse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“assimilates in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intraspecific competition among tillers increased under drought stress conditions and decreased the plant performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intraspecific competition among tillers decreased wheat plant performance.

Treatment
Intraspecific competition among tillerse0
Outcome
the plant performancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“assimilates in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intraspecific competition among tillers increased under drought stress conditions and decreased the plant performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonproductive late tillers did not improve the performance of primary tillers of wheat plants under drought stress, mainly in high-tillering cultivars.

Treatment
Nonproductive late tillerse0
Outcome
the performance of primary tillerse0
Direction
do not improvee0
Qualifier
under drought stress, mainly in high-tillering cultivarse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“assimilates in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nonproductive late tillers do not improve the performance of primary tillers of wheat plants under drought stress, mainly in high-tillering cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Detillering reduced thousand grain weight only in the Parrudo cultivar.

Material
‘Parrudo’e0
Treatment
detillerede0
Outcome
thousand grain weighte0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“assimilates in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“The reduction on the thousand grain weight of only ‘Parrudo’ detillered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1218 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that assimilate remobilization from late tillers to primary tillers and main stem seems more effective in low-tillering cultivars.

Outcome
assimilate remobilization from late tillers to primary tillers and main steme0
Qualifier
more effective in low-tillering cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“assimilates in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“assimilate remobilization from late tillers to primary tillers and main stem seems to be more effective in low-tillering cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1364 · show in text ↑

competition · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

35 papers: 3 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.