Paper · 2020 · Packaging Technology and Science

Active packaging technology to retain storage quality of pear cv. “Bartlett” during shelf‐life periods under ambient holding after periodic cold storage

Satish Kumar; Kamal S. Thakur

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Response of “Bartlett” pears harvested at commercial maturity (104.29‐N firmness and 3.15 starch iodine rating) to various active packaging conditions using O 2 (Fe powder) and ethylene (KMnO 4 ) scavenger sachets in low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) film bags (25.4 and 50.8 μm), cold storage (2 ± 1°C with 95 ± 2%), and shelf‐life holding periods under ambient conditions (24 ± 3°C; 68 ± 5% relative humidity [RH]) was recorded as changes in physic chemical parameters. The fruits were packed in 25.4‐ and 50.8‐μm LDPE film bags containing 5%, 10%, and 15% Fe and KMnO 4 powder incorporated on silica as inert carrier in form of sachets. After packaging the fruits airtight in film bags, they were placed in corrugated fiber board (CFB) boxes (29 × 23 × 14 cm; L × B × H). Fruits packed in 50.8‐μm LDPE film bags with sachets containing 15% Fe powder recorded maximum fruit firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid with minimum spoilage, weight loss (physiological loss of weight [PLW]), pectin methylesterase (PME), polygalacturonase (PG) activity, and respiration rate and increase in fruit calcium content and highest level of overall acceptability (color, taste, aroma, and texture) after periodic cold storage and ambient shelf‐life periods. The effect of different treatments was compared by post hoc analysis using Tukey's test, which also revealed significant differences among different treatments. Our findings also revealed that pear fruit retains edible quality until fruit firmness > 30.89 N, TSS > 10.0%, and weight loss < 9.00%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pears in 50.8 μm LDPE bags with 15% Fe sachets had maximum fruit firmness, TSS and titratable acidity after periodic cold storage and shelf life.

Taxon
pearsPyruse0
Treatment
50.8‐μm LDPE film bags with sachets containing 15% Fe powdere1
Outcome
fruit firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable aciditye1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Response of “Bartlett” pears harvested at commercial maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits packed in 50.8‐μm LDPE film bags with sachets containing 15% Fe powder recorded maximum fruit firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid with minimum spoilage, weight loss (physiological loss of weight [PLW]), pectin methylesterase (PME), polygalacturonase (PG) activity, and respiration rate and increase in fruit calcium content and highest level of overall acceptability (color, taste, aroma, and texture) after periodic cold storage and ambient shelf‐life periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pears in 50.8 μm LDPE bags with 15% Fe sachets had maximum ascorbic acid.

Taxon
pearsPyruse0
Treatment
50.8‐μm LDPE film bags with sachets containing 15% Fe powdere1
Outcome
ascorbic acide1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Response of “Bartlett” pears harvested at commercial maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits packed in 50.8‐μm LDPE film bags with sachets containing 15% Fe powder recorded maximum fruit firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid with minimum spoilage, weight loss (physiological loss of weight [PLW]), pectin methylesterase (PME), polygalacturonase (PG) activity, and respiration rate and increase in fruit calcium content and highest level of overall acceptability (color, taste, aroma, and texture) after periodic cold storage and ambient shelf‐life periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pears in 50.8 μm LDPE bags with 15% Fe sachets had minimum spoilage.

Taxon
pearsPyruse0
Treatment
50.8‐μm LDPE film bags with sachets containing 15% Fe powdere1
Outcome
spoilagee1
Direction
minimume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Response of “Bartlett” pears harvested at commercial maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits packed in 50.8‐μm LDPE film bags with sachets containing 15% Fe powder recorded maximum fruit firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid with minimum spoilage, weight loss (physiological loss of weight [PLW]), pectin methylesterase (PME), polygalacturonase (PG) activity, and respiration rate and increase in fruit calcium content and highest level of overall acceptability (color, taste, aroma, and texture) after periodic cold storage and ambient shelf‐life periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pears in 50.8 μm LDPE bags with 15% Fe sachets had minimum weight loss.

Taxon
pearsPyruse0
Treatment
50.8‐μm LDPE film bags with sachets containing 15% Fe powdere1
Outcome
weight loss (physiological loss of weight [PLW])e1
Direction
minimume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Response of “Bartlett” pears harvested at commercial maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits packed in 50.8‐μm LDPE film bags with sachets containing 15% Fe powder recorded maximum fruit firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid with minimum spoilage, weight loss (physiological loss of weight [PLW]), pectin methylesterase (PME), polygalacturonase (PG) activity, and respiration rate and increase in fruit calcium content and highest level of overall acceptability (color, taste, aroma, and texture) after periodic cold storage and ambient shelf‐life periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pears in 50.8 μm LDPE bags with 15% Fe sachets had minimum pectin methylesterase and polygalacturonase activity.

Taxon
pearsPyruse0
Treatment
50.8‐μm LDPE film bags with sachets containing 15% Fe powdere1
Outcome
pectin methylesterase (PME), polygalacturonase (PG) activitye1
Direction
minimume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Response of “Bartlett” pears harvested at commercial maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits packed in 50.8‐μm LDPE film bags with sachets containing 15% Fe powder recorded maximum fruit firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid with minimum spoilage, weight loss (physiological loss of weight [PLW]), pectin methylesterase (PME), polygalacturonase (PG) activity, and respiration rate and increase in fruit calcium content and highest level of overall acceptability (color, taste, aroma, and texture) after periodic cold storage and ambient shelf‐life periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pears in 50.8 μm LDPE bags with 15% Fe sachets had minimum respiration rate.

Taxon
pearsPyruse0
Treatment
50.8‐μm LDPE film bags with sachets containing 15% Fe powdere1
Outcome
respiration ratee1
Direction
minimume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Response of “Bartlett” pears harvested at commercial maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits packed in 50.8‐μm LDPE film bags with sachets containing 15% Fe powder recorded maximum fruit firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid with minimum spoilage, weight loss (physiological loss of weight [PLW]), pectin methylesterase (PME), polygalacturonase (PG) activity, and respiration rate and increase in fruit calcium content and highest level of overall acceptability (color, taste, aroma, and texture) after periodic cold storage and ambient shelf‐life periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pears in 50.8 μm LDPE bags with 15% Fe sachets had increased fruit calcium content.

Taxon
pearsPyruse0
Treatment
50.8‐μm LDPE film bags with sachets containing 15% Fe powdere1
Outcome
fruit calcium contente1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Response of “Bartlett” pears harvested at commercial maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits packed in 50.8‐μm LDPE film bags with sachets containing 15% Fe powder recorded maximum fruit firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid with minimum spoilage, weight loss (physiological loss of weight [PLW]), pectin methylesterase (PME), polygalacturonase (PG) activity, and respiration rate and increase in fruit calcium content and highest level of overall acceptability (color, taste, aroma, and texture) after periodic cold storage and ambient shelf‐life periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pears in 50.8 μm LDPE bags with 15% Fe sachets had the highest overall acceptability (color, taste, aroma and texture).

Taxon
pearsPyruse0
Treatment
50.8‐μm LDPE film bags with sachets containing 15% Fe powdere1
Outcome
overall acceptability (color, taste, aroma, and texture)e1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Response of “Bartlett” pears harvested at commercial maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits packed in 50.8‐μm LDPE film bags with sachets containing 15% Fe powder recorded maximum fruit firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid with minimum spoilage, weight loss (physiological loss of weight [PLW]), pectin methylesterase (PME), polygalacturonase (PG) activity, and respiration rate and increase in fruit calcium content and highest level of overall acceptability (color, taste, aroma, and texture) after periodic cold storage and ambient shelf‐life periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–1280 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Post hoc analysis showed significant differences among the packaging treatments in pear quality.

Taxon
pearsPyruse0
Outcome
significant differences among different treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Response of “Bartlett” pears harvested at commercial maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e2

“The effect of different treatments was compared by post hoc analysis using Tukey's test, which also revealed significant differences among different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1441 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pear fruit retains edible quality until firmness is above 30.89 N, TSS above 10.0% and weight loss below 9.00%.

Outcome
edible qualitye3
Value
30.89 Ne3
Qualifier
TSS > 10.0%, and weight loss < 9.00%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Our findings also revealed that pear fruit retains edible quality until fruit firmness > 30.89 N, TSS > 10.0%, and weight loss < 9.00%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1577 · show in text ↑

botanical · molecular: metabolites · Pyrus (pears)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · quality: postharvest · Pyrus (pears)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.