Paper · 2021 · Coatings

The Effect of Whey Protein-Based Edible Coatings Incorporated with Lemon and Lemongrass Essential Oils on the Quality Attributes of Fresh-Cut Pears during Storage

Sabina Galus; Magdalena Mikus; Agnieszka Ciurzyńska; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
64
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of edible coatings based on whey protein isolate and essential oils (lemon and lemongrass) on the colour, hardness, polyphenols and flavonoids content, structure, and sensory attributes of fresh-cut pears during storage at 4 °C. The optical and barrier properties of the edible films were also determined. Analysed films showed good transparency (Lightness 86.6–95.0) and excellent oxygen and carbon dioxide permeability, which were reduced due to the presence of lemon and lemongrass essential oils. Pears were coated by immersion in a solution containing 8% of whey protein isolate and the addition of lemon oil at 1.0% or lemongrass essential oil at 0.5%. Coating caused a reduction in colour changes, loss in hardness, polyphenols and flavonoids. The study showed that the highest efficiency was demonstrated by the whey protein isolate coatings without the addition of essential oils by preserving the colour and firmness of fresh-cut pears. For these samples, the highest sensory acceptability was also achieved.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The analysed edible films showed good transparency (Lightness 86.6–95.0).

Outcome
transparencye0
Value
Lightness 86.6–95.0e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Analysed films showed good transparency (Lightness 86.6–95.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–408 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxygen and carbon dioxide permeability of the films was excellent and was reduced by the presence of lemon and lemongrass essential oils.

Treatment
lemon and lemongrass essential oilse0
Outcome
oxygen and carbon dioxide permeabilitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“excellent oxygen and carbon dioxide permeability, which were reduced due to the presence of lemon and lemongrass essential oils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–540 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating reduced colour changes and the losses in hardness, polyphenols and flavonoids of fresh-cut pears.

Taxon
PearsPyrust0
Treatment
Coatinge0
Outcome
colour changes, loss in hardness, polyphenols and flavonoidse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fresh-Cut Pears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“Coating caused a reduction in colour changes, loss in hardness, polyphenols and flavonoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whey protein isolate coatings without essential oils were the most efficient at preserving colour and firmness of fresh-cut pears.

Taxon
PearsPyrust0
Treatment
whey protein isolate coatings without the addition of essential oilse0
Outcome
colour and firmnesse0
Direction
highest efficiencye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fresh-Cut Pears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest efficiency was demonstrated by the whey protein isolate coatings without the addition of essential oils by preserving the colour and firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pears with whey protein isolate coatings without essential oils achieved the highest sensory acceptability.

Taxon
PearsPyrust0
Outcome
sensory acceptabilitye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fresh-Cut Pears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“For these samples, the highest sensory acceptability was also achieved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1058 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: phytochemicals · Pyrus (pears)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · molecular: metabolites · Pyrus (pears)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · quality: postharvest · Pyrus (pears)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.