Paper · 2019 · Progressive Horticulture

Effects of transplanting schedule and types of mulching on yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)

A.K. Dubey; Saurabh Tomar; V.K. Tripathi

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The experiment was carried-out in two consecutive years (2016–17 and 2017–18, respectively) at Vegetable Research Farm, Kalyanpur, Kanpur. This was consisted of four different dates of transplanting, viz., 15th October; 31st October; 15th November and 30th November along with four types of mulches (Black polythene, White poly polythene; Paddy straw and Control-without mulch) and the experiment was laid out with factorial randomized block design with following four objective: -find out the frequency of different dates of transplanting; observe the effect of different mulches; find out interaction of different dates and mulches and work out economics of above treatments of the experimentation. The present study revealed that the tomato seedlings transplanted on 30th October and application of paddy straw as mulch significantly increased the growth attributing traits viz.-plant height, number of branches (primary and secondary); flowering characters, viz.,-days to 50% flowering, number of flowers per inflorescence, inflorescence per plant, days taken to first and last harvest; yield attributing characters viz.-number of fruits per plant, fruit weight, marketable and non-marketable yield and total yield; quality characters viz.-fruit firmness, total soluble solids acidity and ascorbic acid content. This treatment combination also reduces the weed-intensity, weed bio-mass (fresh and dry weight), individual weed species at harvesting stage and disease intensity during both the years of experimentation. The seedlings transplanted on second date ie. 30th October and application of bio-mulch (paddy straw) found economically better than other treatments. The maximum benefit-cost ratio (3.73 and 3.86) was also found in 30th October transplanting as compare to control (without mulch)-2.75 and 2.85, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported transplanting and paddy straw mulch combination significantly increased tomato growth and flowering traits.

Treatment
transplanted on 30th October and application of paddy straw as mulche0
Outcome
growth attributing traitse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tomato seedlings transplanted on 30th October and application of paddy straw as mulch significantly increased the growth attributing traits viz.-plant height, number of branches (primary and secondary); flowering characters, viz.,-days to 50% flowering, number of flowers per inflorescence, inflorescence per plant, days taken to first and last harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1089 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination significantly increased tomato fruit and yield traits.

Treatment
transplanted on 30th October and application of paddy straw as mulche0
Outcome
marketable and non-marketable yield and total yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tomato seedlings transplanted on 30th October and application of paddy straw as mulch significantly increased the growth attributing traits viz.-plant height, number of branches (primary and secondary); flowering characters, viz.,-days to 50% flowering, number of flowers per inflorescence, inflorescence per plant, days taken to first and last harvest; yield attributing characters viz.-number of fruits per plant, fruit weight, marketable and non-marketable yield and total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination significantly increased tomato fruit quality traits.

Treatment
transplanted on 30th October and application of paddy straw as mulche0
Outcome
fruit firmness, total soluble solids acidity and ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tomato seedlings transplanted on 30th October and application of paddy straw as mulch significantly increased the growth attributing traits viz.-plant height, number of branches (primary and secondary); flowering characters, viz.,-days to 50% flowering, number of flowers per inflorescence, inflorescence per plant, days taken to first and last harvest; yield attributing characters viz.-number of fruits per plant, fruit weight, marketable and non-marketable yield and total yield; quality characters viz.-fruit firmness, total soluble solids acidity and ascorbic acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination reduced weed intensity and biomass at harvest.

Treatment
This treatment combinatione0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed-intensity, weed bio-mass (fresh and dry weight), individual weed speciese0
Direction
reducese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment combination also reduces the weed-intensity, weed bio-mass (fresh and dry weight), individual weed species at harvesting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1457 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination reduced disease intensity in both years.

Treatment
This treatment combinatione0
Outcome
disease intensitye0
Direction
reducese0
Qualifier
both the years of experimentatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment combination also reduces the weed-intensity, weed bio-mass (fresh and dry weight), individual weed species at harvesting stage and disease intensity during both the years of experimentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1520 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 30 October paddy straw treatment was economically better than other treatments.

Treatment
30th October and application of bio-mulch (paddy straw)e0
Outcome
economically bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seedlings transplanted on second date ie. 30th October and application of bio-mulch (paddy straw) found economically better than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1671 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 30 October treatment had maximum benefit-cost ratios of 3.73 and 3.86 versus 2.75 and 2.85 for control.

Treatment
30th October transplantinge0
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.73 and 3.86e0
Qualifier
2.75 and 2.85e0
Comparator
control (without mulch)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum benefit-cost ratio (3.73 and 3.86) was also found in 30th October transplanting as compare to control (without mulch)-2.75 and 2.85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1816 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑

transplanting · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mulching · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

mulching · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

73 papers: 62 positive, 11 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

transplanting · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

transplanting · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 23 positive, 9 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

mulching · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 44 positive, 11 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.