Paper · 2012 · Journal of Plant Production

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON HYBRID AND INBRED RICE UNDER DROUGHT AND SALINE STRESSES

B. Zayed; R. El-Namaky; Y. El–Refaee; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The high heterosis displayed by hybrid rice might be exploitable for the enhancement of rice productivity in the presence of economically-important stresses such as drought and salinity. The current study aimed to find out the possibility of exploring hybrid rice under drought and salinity stresses. Rice varieties, Giza 177 and Giza 178 (inbred rice varieties) and SK2034H (the first hybrid rice released in Egypt) were tested under normal, saline and drought conditions using a split plot design with four replications. The investigation conducted under a controlled system in the greenhouse and field(Farm) of Rice Research and TrainingCenter, Sakha, Kafr EL-Sheikh as well as at El-Sirw Agriculture Research Station i.e. saline soils, Egypt during two growing seasons of 2010 and 2011 in greenhouse and in 2011 under field conditions. The three rice varieties varied significantly in all estimated parameters and in their stress tolerance. The hybrid variety SK2034H was more tolerant to salinity and drought than Giza 178, the most tolerant Egyptian inbred rice varieties. This high capability of the Egyptian-developed hybrid might be mainly attributed to its greater root vigor, leaf area, flag leaf area, chlorophyll content, dry matter production, filled grains number, panicle number and weight; and lower sterility percent (sterility%). Furthermore, SK2034H had higher Na+ and K+ content than Giza 178, leading to a resulting in improved tolerance to stress. On the other hand, Giza 177 was more stress sensitive, possibly due to weakness of root system, poor growth, chlorophyll degradation, high Na/K ratio, and high sterility both stresses. The result obtained from saline soil and drought tested under field conditions came to confirm the obtained one under green house. Interestingly, both SK2034H and Giza 178 were at the same level for salinity tolerance, while SK2034H was more drought tolerant than Giza 178. stress. From the aforementioned results, SK2034H could be used on large scale especially under salt affected areas and in the end tail of irrigation canal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SK2034H was more tolerant to salinity and drought than Giza 178 under stress.

Material
SK2034He1
Treatment
salinity and droughte1
Outcome
tolerancee2
Direction
more tolerante1
Comparator
Giza 178e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The hybrid variety SK2034H was more tolerant to salinity and drought than Giza 178, the most tolerant Egyptian inbred rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1077 · show in text ↑
e2

“The three rice varieties varied significantly in all estimated parameters and in their stress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SK2034H and Giza 178 were at the same level for salinity tolerance.

Material
SK2034He3
Treatment
salinitye3
Outcome
salinity tolerancee3
Direction
same levele3
Comparator
Giza 178e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The three rice varieties varied significantly in all estimated parameters and in their stress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–943 · show in text ↑
e3

“Interestingly, both SK2034H and Giza 178 were at the same level for salinity tolerance, while SK2034H was more drought tolerant than Giza 178”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1787–1928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SK2034H was more drought tolerant than Giza 178.

Material
SK2034He3
Treatment
droughte3
Outcome
drought tolerante3
Direction
more drought tolerante3
Comparator
Giza 178e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The three rice varieties varied significantly in all estimated parameters and in their stress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–943 · show in text ↑
e3

“Interestingly, both SK2034H and Giza 178 were at the same level for salinity tolerance, while SK2034H was more drought tolerant than Giza 178”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1787–1928 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SK2034H has greater root vigor, leaf area and flag leaf area.

Outcome
root vigor, leaf area, flag leaf areae7
Direction
greatere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The three rice varieties varied significantly in all estimated parameters and in their stress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–943 · show in text ↑
e7

“greater root vigor, leaf area, flag leaf area, chlorophyll content, dry matter production, filled grains number, panicle number and weight; and lower sterility percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1334 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SK2034H has greater chlorophyll content, dry matter production and filled grains number.

Outcome
chlorophyll content, dry matter production, filled grains numbere7
Direction
greatere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The three rice varieties varied significantly in all estimated parameters and in their stress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–943 · show in text ↑
e7

“greater root vigor, leaf area, flag leaf area, chlorophyll content, dry matter production, filled grains number, panicle number and weight; and lower sterility percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1334 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SK2034H has greater panicle number and weight.

Outcome
panicle number and weighte7
Direction
greatere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The three rice varieties varied significantly in all estimated parameters and in their stress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–943 · show in text ↑
e7

“greater root vigor, leaf area, flag leaf area, chlorophyll content, dry matter production, filled grains number, panicle number and weight; and lower sterility percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1334 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SK2034H has lower sterility percent.

Outcome
sterility percente7
Direction
lowere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The three rice varieties varied significantly in all estimated parameters and in their stress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–943 · show in text ↑
e7

“greater root vigor, leaf area, flag leaf area, chlorophyll content, dry matter production, filled grains number, panicle number and weight; and lower sterility percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1334 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SK2034H had higher Na+ and K+ content than Giza 178.

Material
SK2034He4
Outcome
Na+ and K+ contente4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
Giza 178e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The three rice varieties varied significantly in all estimated parameters and in their stress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–943 · show in text ↑
e4

“SK2034H had higher Na+ and K+ content than Giza 178”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1413 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 177 was more stress sensitive than the other varieties.

Material
Giza 177e5
Outcome
stress sensitivee5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The three rice varieties varied significantly in all estimated parameters and in their stress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–943 · show in text ↑
e5

“Giza 177 was more stress sensitive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1524 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend that SK2034H could be used on large scale, especially in salt-affected areas.

Material
SK2034He6
Outcome
used on large scalee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The three rice varieties varied significantly in all estimated parameters and in their stress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–943 · show in text ↑
e6

“SK2034H could be used on large scale especially under salt affected areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1971–2044 · show in text ↑

salinity · tolerance: abiotic · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

salinity · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 16 positive, 9 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

drought · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 20 positive, 7 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.