Paper · 2020 · Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies

Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment

Ludmila Pusik; Vlаdimir Pusik; Olga Postnova; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of the current research was to scientifically substantiate the influence of the elements of postharvest treatment on the preservation of winter garlic.Long-term storage of garlic from harvest to harvest is a prerequisite for the continuous supply of the population with garlic. There is a need for postharvest treatment of winter garlic, aimed at reducing the losses and extending the storage duration. An important link in this is the postharvest period (additional drying). Dried garlic has increased resistance to the damage by microorganisms and loses less weight during storage. The use of biopreparations during postharvest treatment makes it possible to reduce the losses of winter garlic from microbiological diseases during storage.It was theoretically grounded and experimentally proven that natural losses for the entire period of drying of topped garlic were 15.9 % in Diushes variety, 21.8 % in Merefians'kyi white variety. The same regularity was observed when drying garlic with the stem, the weight losses were 38.7 and 49.0 %, respectively. The losses of the weight of non-dried bulbs were from 11.09 to 14.4 %, depending on the variety, which was the largest part in the structure of garlic losses. The losses from the damage by diseases range from 5.28 to 12, 15 % and have a strong correlation r=0.98.The yield of marketable products after six months of storage depends on the moisture content of a bulb neck. At drying up to the neck moisture content of 25±1 %, the yield of the marketable products accounted for 76.33 % for the variety of Merefians'kyi white and 78.59 % for the variety Merefians'kyi pink (Diushes). The garlic dried up to the neck moisture content of 14±1 % increased the yield of marketable products up to 82.98–80.15 %, while the non-dried garlic decreased it up to 72.25–63.45 %, respectively.The pre-storage treatment of bulbs of the garlic variety Merefians'kyi pink (Diushes) with 2 % gliocladine increased the yield of the marketable products by 10.1 %, and that of the variety Merefians'kyi by 10.2 %.The treatment with 2 % phytosporine increased the yield of marketable products by 10 and 9.5 %

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural losses over the entire drying period of topped garlic were 15.9 % in the Diushes variety.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Material
Diushes varietye1
Treatment
dryinge1
Outcome
natural lossese1
Value
15.9 %e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“natural losses for the entire period of drying of topped garlic were 15.9 % in Diushes variety, 21.8 % in Merefians'kyi white variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–943 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural losses over the entire drying period of topped garlic were 21.8 % in the Merefians'kyi white variety.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Material
Merefians'kyi whitee1
Treatment
dryinge1
Outcome
natural lossese1
Value
21.8 %e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“natural losses for the entire period of drying of topped garlic were 15.9 % in Diushes variety, 21.8 % in Merefians'kyi white variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–943 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight losses when drying garlic with the stem were 38.7 %.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
drying garlic with the steme2
Outcome
weight lossese2
Value
38.7e2

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“The same regularity was observed when drying garlic with the stem, the weight losses were 38.7 and 49.0 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1064 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight losses when drying garlic with the stem were 49.0 %.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
drying garlic with the steme2
Outcome
weight lossese2
Value
49.0 %e2

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“The same regularity was observed when drying garlic with the stem, the weight losses were 38.7 and 49.0 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1064 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight losses of non-dried garlic bulbs were 11.09 to 14.4 %, depending on the variety.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
non-driede3
Outcome
losses of the weight of non-dried bulbse3
Value
from 11.09 to 14.4 %e3
Qualifier
depending on the varietye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“The losses of the weight of non-dried bulbs were from 11.09 to 14.4 %, depending on the variety, which was the largest part in the structure of garlic losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1223 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight losses of non-dried garlic bulbs were the largest part in the structure of garlic losses.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Outcome
losses of the weight of non-dried bulbse3
Qualifier
the largest part in the structure of garlic lossese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“The losses of the weight of non-dried bulbs were from 11.09 to 14.4 %, depending on the variety, which was the largest part in the structure of garlic losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1223 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Losses from the damage by diseases in stored garlic ranged from 5.28 to 12.15 %.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Outcome
losses from the damage by diseasese4
Value
from 5.28 to 12, 15 %e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e4

“The losses from the damage by diseases range from 5.28 to 12, 15 % and have a strong correlation r=0.98”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1328 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Losses from the damage by diseases show a strong correlation (r=0.98) in winter garlic.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
the damage by diseasese4
Outcome
correlatione4
Value
r=0.98e4
Qualifier
strong correlatione4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e4

“The losses from the damage by diseases range from 5.28 to 12, 15 % and have a strong correlation r=0.98”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1328 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of marketable garlic products after six months of storage depends on the moisture content of the bulb neck.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
moisture content of a bulb necke5
Outcome
yield of marketable productse5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“The yield of marketable products after six months of storage depends on the moisture content of a bulb neck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1436 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drying garlic to a neck moisture of 25 % gave a marketable yield of 76.33 % for the Merefians'kyi white variety after six months of storage.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Material
Merefians'kyi whitee6
Treatment
drying up to the neck moisture content of 25±1 %e6
Outcome
yield of the marketable productse6
Value
76.33 %e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e6

“At drying up to the neck moisture content of 25±1 %, the yield of the marketable products accounted for 76.33 % for the variety of Merefians'kyi white and 78.59 % for the variety Merefians'kyi pink (Diushes)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1645 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drying garlic to a neck moisture of 25 % gave a marketable yield of 78.59 % for the Merefians'kyi pink (Diushes) variety after six months of storage.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Material
Merefians'kyi pink (Diushes)e6
Treatment
drying up to the neck moisture content of 25±1 %e6
Outcome
yield of the marketable productse6
Value
78.59 %e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e6

“At drying up to the neck moisture content of 25±1 %, the yield of the marketable products accounted for 76.33 % for the variety of Merefians'kyi white and 78.59 % for the variety Merefians'kyi pink (Diushes)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drying garlic to a neck moisture of 14 % increased the marketable yield to 82.98–80.15 %, compared with non-dried garlic.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
dried up to the neck moisture content of 14±1 %e7
Outcome
yield of marketable productse7
Direction
increasede7
Value
82.98–80.15 %e7
Comparator
non-dried garlice7

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e7

“The garlic dried up to the neck moisture content of 14±1 % increased the yield of marketable products up to 82.98–80.15 %, while the non-dried garlic decreased it up to 72.25–63.45 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-dried garlic reduced the marketable yield to 72.25–63.45 %, compared with garlic dried to a neck moisture of 14 %.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
non-dried garlice7
Outcome
yield of marketable productse7
Direction
decreasede7
Value
72.25–63.45 %e7
Comparator
dried up to the neck moisture content of 14±1 %e7

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e7

“The garlic dried up to the neck moisture content of 14±1 % increased the yield of marketable products up to 82.98–80.15 %, while the non-dried garlic decreased it up to 72.25–63.45 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-storage treatment of the Merefians'kyi pink (Diushes) garlic variety with 2 % gliocladine increased the marketable yield by 10.1 %.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Material
Merefians'kyi pink (Diushes)e0
Treatment
2 % gliocladinee0
Outcome
yield of the marketable productse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.1 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pre-storage treatment of bulbs of the garlic variety Merefians'kyi pink (Diushes) with 2 % gliocladine increased the yield of the marketable products by 10.1 %, and that of the variety Merefians'kyi by 10.2 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1844–2056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-storage treatment of the Merefians'kyi garlic variety with 2 % gliocladine increased the marketable yield by 10.2 %.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Material
Merefians'kyie0
Treatment
2 % gliocladinee0
Outcome
yield of the marketable productse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.2 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pre-storage treatment of bulbs of the garlic variety Merefians'kyi pink (Diushes) with 2 % gliocladine increased the yield of the marketable products by 10.1 %, and that of the variety Merefians'kyi by 10.2 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1844–2056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment with 2 % phytosporine increased the marketable yield by 10 %.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
2 % phytosporinee1
Outcome
yield of marketable productse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
10e1

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatment with 2 % phytosporine increased the yield of marketable products by 10 and 9.5 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2057–2151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment with 2 % phytosporine increased the marketable yield by 9.5 %.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
2 % phytosporinee1
Outcome
yield of marketable productse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
9.5 %e1

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preservation of winter garlic depending on the elements of postharvest treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatment with 2 % phytosporine increased the yield of marketable products by 10 and 9.5 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2057–2151 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: postharvest · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

soil water · quality: postharvest · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.