Paper · 2020 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effects of foliar selenium application on some physiological and phytochemical parameters ofVitis viniferaL. cv. Sultana under salt stress

Rouhollah Karimi; Mehdi Ghabooli; Jamshid Rahimi; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
61
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this research the effect of foliar application of selenium (Se) at four levels (Na2OSe4; 0, 5, 10 and 20 mg L−1) was evaluated on some phytochemical characteristics of Sultana grapevine under different salinity levels (NaCl; 0 or 75 mM). The vines were fed twice a week with Hoagland nutrient solution and Se was foliar applied twice with 24 intervals. During growing period, plant height, leaf number and leaf area were recorded. Moreover, at the end of experiment, mature leaves from middle nods of canes were used for measurement of some phytochemical indices. According to results, Se application had a positive effect on plant height, leaf numbers, leaf area and photosynthetic pigments content especially at 5 mg L−1 and to some extent 10 mg L−1 Se levels. Under salinity stress, foliar application of Se at 5 mg L−1 considerably decreased vines leaves electrolyte leakage and lipid peroxidation values compared to non se-treated plants under salinity stress condition. Selenium had an additive effect on salinity stress (75 mM NaCl) induced accumulation of total phenol, total flavonoid, soluble sugars and proline content in leave of vines. Moreover, the interaction of salinity and Se at 5 and 10 mg L−1 improved leaves antioxidant enzymes activities in Sultana grapevine. Likewise, foliar application of Se improved leaf mineral content in 75 mM NaCl -treated vines. Totally, foliar application of selenium (Se at 5 or 10 mg L−1) increased salt tolerance through improvement in nutritional balance and by enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant capacity in grapevine leaves.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium application had a positive effect on grapevine plant height, leaf number and leaf area.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Se applicatione1
Outcome
plant height, leaf numbers, leaf areae1
Direction
positive effecte1
Qualifier
especially at 5 mg L−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Se application had a positive effect on plant height, leaf numbers, leaf area and photosynthetic pigments content especially at 5 mg L−1 and to some extent 10 mg L−1 Se levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis viniferaL. cv. Sultana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium application had a positive effect on grapevine photosynthetic pigments content.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Se applicatione1
Outcome
photosynthetic pigments contente1
Direction
positive effecte1
Qualifier
especially at 5 mg L−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Se application had a positive effect on plant height, leaf numbers, leaf area and photosynthetic pigments content especially at 5 mg L−1 and to some extent 10 mg L−1 Se levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis viniferaL. cv. Sultana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salinity, foliar Se at 5 mg L−1 decreased electrolyte leakage and lipid peroxidation in grapevine leaves compared with non-Se-treated plants.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
foliar application of Se at 5 mg L−1e2
Outcome
electrolyte leakage and lipid peroxidation valuese2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
under salinity stress conditione2
Comparator
non se-treated plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Under salinity stress, foliar application of Se at 5 mg L−1 considerably decreased vines leaves electrolyte leakage and lipid peroxidation values compared to non se-treated plants under salinity stress condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis viniferaL. cv. Sultana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium had an additive effect on salinity-induced accumulation of total phenol and total flavonoid in grapevine leaves.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Seleniume3
Outcome
total phenol, total flavonoide3
Direction
additive effecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Selenium had an additive effect on salinity stress (75 mM NaCl) induced accumulation of total phenol, total flavonoid, soluble sugars and proline content in leave of vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis viniferaL. cv. Sultana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium had an additive effect on salinity-induced accumulation of soluble sugars and proline in grapevine leaves.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Seleniume3
Outcome
soluble sugars and proline contente3
Direction
additive effecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Selenium had an additive effect on salinity stress (75 mM NaCl) induced accumulation of total phenol, total flavonoid, soluble sugars and proline content in leave of vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis viniferaL. cv. Sultana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of salinity and Se at 5 and 10 mg L−1 improved antioxidant enzyme activities in grapevine leaves.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
the interaction of salinity and Se at 5 and 10 mg L−1e4
Outcome
antioxidant enzymes activitiese4
Direction
improvede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“the interaction of salinity and Se at 5 and 10 mg L−1 improved leaves antioxidant enzymes activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis viniferaL. cv. Sultana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Se improved leaf mineral content of grapevine under 75 mM NaCl.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
foliar application of See5
Outcome
leaf mineral contente5
Direction
improvede5
Qualifier
in 75 mM NaCl -treated vinese5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Likewise, foliar application of Se improved leaf mineral content in 75 mM NaCl -treated vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis viniferaL. cv. Sultana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar selenium at 5 or 10 mg L−1 increased grapevine salt tolerance through improved nutritional balance and antioxidant capacity.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
foliar application of selenium (Se at 5 or 10 mg L−1)e6
Outcome
salt tolerancee6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
through improvement in nutritional balance and by enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant capacitye6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“foliar application of selenium (Se at 5 or 10 mg L−1) increased salt tolerance through improvement in nutritional balance and by enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant capacity in grapevine leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis viniferaL. cv. Sultana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–120 · show in text ↑

selenium atom · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

selenium atom · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

selenium atom · nutrient: content · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · tolerance: abiotic · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · physiology: oxidative · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.