Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Impact of seed dressing and systemic fungicidal sprays in controlling the magnitude and spread of the late blight (Phytophthora infestans) disease in addition to augmenting the yield of superior grade potato tubers

SH Peerzada; HS Viswanath; KA Bhat

15
claims
33
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Potato late blight is one of the devastating plant diseases. The pathogen is primarily seed borne and polycyclic in nature dispersing many secondary sporangiospores from foliar infected plants to healthy ones spreading rapidly within short span causing heavy yield losses. So, in the present study, two different experiments were conducted separately, where in the first one, seed dressing with different fungicides was carried out under pot conditions followed by second experiment in finding the effect of systemic foliar fungicidal sprays under field conditions against the incidence and intensity of late blight disease. Four different fungicides (one protectant and three systemic) viz., mancozeb 75 WP, dimethomorph 50WP, cymoxanil 8 + mancozeb 64 WP and metalaxyl 8 + mancozeb 64 WP, were evaluated as seed dressers against late blight (Phytophthora infestans) of potato cv. Kufri Jyoti in pot experiments during 2016 and 2017cropping seasons. The results obtained during both cropping seasons revealed that all the fungicidal seed dressers delayed the appearance of first symptoms of the disease. The disease incidence and intensity recorded indicated that all the fungicides significantly reduced the late blight at all the periods compared to control (water). The ‘A’(AUDPC) values were significantly reduced when tubers were treated with different fungicides. Tuber treatment with dimethomorph or metalaxyl + mancozeb showed minimum ‘A’ value of 125.91 compared to the maximum “A” value of 185.20 for undressed control during 2016 and similar trend of results was observed during 2017 cropping season. In the second experiment of systemic foliar fungicidal sprays, three systemic fungicides viz. dimethomorph 50 WP at 0.05% (C1), 0.10% (C2) and 0. 15%(C3) concentrations, metalaxyl 8+mancozeb 64 WP and Cymoxanil 8 + mancozeb 72 WP at 0.15% (C1), 0.20% (C2) & 0.25% (C3) concentrations sprayed at ten days interval after symptom development till dehaulming stage were evaluated against the disease incidence and intensity during 2016 & 2017 cropping seasons. The results obtained during 2016 cropping season revealed that, among the systemic/translaminar fungicidal foliar sprays, all the fungicides were equally superior to water-sprayed control in reducing the blight incidence from 74.04 to17.03 per cent. On an average, foliar spray with dimethomorph yielded the minimum blight intensity of 11.64 per cent followed by cymoxanil 8 + mancozeb 72 WP 13.02 per cent spray compared to 56.27 per cent obtained in water- sprayed check. Dimethomorph foliar sprays at C2 and C3 concentrations were found most effective recording the lowest blight intensities of 8.38 and 8.44% respectively and least “A” value followed by foliar spray with cymoxanil 8+mancozeb 72 WP (10.35-10.41%) compared to water sprayed check (56.27%) during 2016 and similar trend was observed during 2017 cropping season. It was also found that the foliar sprays with dimethomorph resulted in the highest tuber yield (206.14 q tubers per hectare) and large sized tubers followed by foliar sprays with metalaxyl 8+mancozeb 64 WP as compared to water-sprayed control plots (152.72 q/ ha)with small sized tubers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All fungicidal seed dressings delayed first late blight symptoms.

Material
Kufri Jyotie1
Treatment
fungicidal seed dresserse0
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse1pathogen
Outcome
appearance of first symptoms of the diseasee0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 201–214 · show in text ↑
e0

“all the fungicidal seed dressers delayed the appearance of first symptoms of the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“late blight (Phytophthora infestans) of potato cv. Kufri Jyoti”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All seed dressing fungicides significantly reduced late blight incidence and intensity versus water.

Treatment
all the fungicidese0
Outcome
disease incidence and intensitye1
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
at all the periodse0
Comparator
control (water)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the fungicides significantly reduced the late blight at all the periods compared to control (water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1268 · show in text ↑
e1

“The disease incidence and intensity recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 201–214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicidal tuber treatments significantly reduced AUDPC values.

Treatment
different fungicidese0
Outcome
‘A’(AUDPC) valuese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 201–214 · show in text ↑
e0

“The ‘A’(AUDPC) values were significantly reduced when tubers were treated with different fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethomorph tuber treatment had minimum AUDPC value of 125.91 versus 185.20 for undressed control in 2016.

Treatment
dimethomorphe0
Outcome
‘A’ valuee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
125.91e0
Qualifier
2016e0
Comparator
undressed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 201–214 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tuber treatment with dimethomorph or metalaxyl + mancozeb showed minimum ‘A’ value of 125.91 compared to the maximum “A” value of 185.20 for undressed control during 2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metalaxyl plus mancozeb tuber treatment had minimum AUDPC value of 125.91 versus undressed control in 2016.

Treatment
metalaxyl + mancozebe0
Outcome
‘A’ valuee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
125.91e0
Qualifier
2016e0
Comparator
undressed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 201–214 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tuber treatment with dimethomorph or metalaxyl + mancozeb showed minimum ‘A’ value of 125.91 compared to the maximum “A” value of 185.20 for undressed control during 2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fungicides reduced late blight incidence from 74.04 to 17.03 per cent versus water control in 2016.

Treatment
all the fungicidese0
Outcome
blight incidencee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
74.04 to17.03 per cente0
Comparator
water-sprayed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 201–214 · show in text ↑
e0

“all the fungicides were equally superior to water-sprayed control in reducing the blight incidence from 74.04 to17.03 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2192–2318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethomorph foliar spray had minimum blight intensity of 11.64 per cent versus 56.27 per cent in water check.

Treatment
foliar spray with dimethomorphe0
Outcome
blight intensitye0
Direction
minimume0
Value
11.64 per cente0
Comparator
water- sprayed checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 201–214 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar spray with dimethomorph yielded the minimum blight intensity of 11.64 per cent followed by cymoxanil 8 + mancozeb 72 WP 13.02 per cent spray compared to 56.27 per cent obtained in water- sprayed check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2335–2542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cymoxanil plus mancozeb foliar spray gave blight intensity of 13.02 per cent versus water check.

Treatment
cymoxanil 8 + mancozeb 72 WPe0
Outcome
blight intensitye0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
13.02 per cente0
Comparator
water- sprayed checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 201–214 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar spray with dimethomorph yielded the minimum blight intensity of 11.64 per cent followed by cymoxanil 8 + mancozeb 72 WP 13.02 per cent spray compared to 56.27 per cent obtained in water- sprayed check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2335–2542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethomorph C2 spray gave lowest blight intensity, 8.38%, versus 56.27% in water check.

Treatment
Dimethomorph foliar sprays at C2e0
Outcome
blight intensitiese0
Direction
loweste0
Value
8.38e0
Qualifier
2016e0
Comparator
water sprayed checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 201–214 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dimethomorph foliar sprays at C2 and C3 concentrations were found most effective recording the lowest blight intensities of 8.38 and 8.44% respectively and least “A” value followed by foliar spray with cymoxanil 8+mancozeb 72 WP (10.35-10.41%) compared to water sprayed check (56.27%) during 2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2544–2840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethomorph C3 spray gave lowest blight intensity, 8.44%, versus water check.

Treatment
Dimethomorph foliar sprays at C2 and C3 concentrationse0
Outcome
blight intensitiese0
Direction
loweste0
Value
8.44%e0
Comparator
water sprayed checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 201–214 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dimethomorph foliar sprays at C2 and C3 concentrations were found most effective recording the lowest blight intensities of 8.38 and 8.44% respectively and least “A” value followed by foliar spray with cymoxanil 8+mancozeb 72 WP (10.35-10.41%) compared to water sprayed check (56.27%) during 2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2544–2840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethomorph foliar sprays yielded the least AUDPC value.

Treatment
Dimethomorph foliar sprays at C2 and C3 concentrationse0
Outcome
“A” valuee0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 201–214 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dimethomorph foliar sprays at C2 and C3 concentrations were found most effective recording the lowest blight intensities of 8.38 and 8.44% respectively and least “A” value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2544–2715 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cymoxanil plus mancozeb foliar spray gave blight intensity of 10.35-10.41% versus water check.

Treatment
foliar spray with cymoxanil 8+mancozeb 72 WPe0
Outcome
blight intensitiese1
Direction
loweste1
Value
10.35-10.41%e0
Comparator
water sprayed checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 201–214 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar spray with cymoxanil 8+mancozeb 72 WP (10.35-10.41%) compared to water sprayed check (56.27%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2728–2828 · show in text ↑
e1

“lowest blight intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2639–2664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethomorph foliar spray yielded 206.14 q tubers per hectare versus 152.72 q/ ha in water control.

Treatment
foliar sprays with dimethomorphe0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
206.14 q tubers per hectaree0
Comparator
water-sprayed control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 201–214 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar sprays with dimethomorph resulted in the highest tuber yield (206.14 q tubers per hectare) and large sized tubers followed by foliar sprays with metalaxyl 8+mancozeb 64 WP as compared to water-sprayed control plots (152.72 q/ ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2928–3164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethomorph foliar spray produced large sized tubers versus small sized tubers in water control.

Treatment
foliar sprays with dimethomorphe0
Outcome
large sized tuberse0
Comparator
water-sprayed control plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 201–214 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar sprays with dimethomorph resulted in the highest tuber yield (206.14 q tubers per hectare) and large sized tubers followed by foliar sprays with metalaxyl 8+mancozeb 64 WP as compared to water-sprayed control plots (152.72 q/ ha)with small sized tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2928–3187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metalaxyl plus mancozeb foliar spray ranked after dimethomorph for tuber yield and size.

Treatment
foliar sprays with metalaxyl 8+mancozeb 64 WPe0
Outcome
large sized tuberse0
Direction
followed bye0
Comparator
water-sprayed control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 201–214 · show in text ↑
e0

“large sized tubers followed by foliar sprays with metalaxyl 8+mancozeb 64 WP as compared to water-sprayed control plots (152.72 q/ ha)with small sized tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3030–3187 · show in text ↑

cymoxanil · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mancozeb · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

dimethomorph · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

dimethomorph · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fungicide · Phytophthora infestans · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 32 positive, 8 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

application · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 67 positive, 10 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

fungicide · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 74 positive, 6 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

application · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 177 positive, 14 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

187 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.