Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during Rabi season of 2015-16. Geographically Lucknow is situated at 26050’ N latitude, 80052’ E longitude and altitude of 111 miter above mean sea level (MSL)at Horticulture Research Farm-1, Babasaheb Bheemrao Ambedkar University Vidya Vihar, Rae Bareli Road, Lucknow, (U.P.) 226025, Studies on the “Effect of boron and zinc on Physical characters, Yield attributing characters and Bio-chemical aspects of fruits, yield and quality of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”, revealed that Physical characters viz. Fruit weight(101.33g), Fruit length (0.53m), fruit diameter maximum (0.39m), Fruit volume (89.67ml) and Pericarp thickness (0.17mm), Peel weight(0.039g), Number of aril/fruit (302.67) and Aril weight(0.06 g), Aril length (0.48), Aril diameter (0.30), Yield attributing characters viz. Fruit yield g/plant (435.35g), Fruit yield kg/ha(299.67kg/ha), and Bio-chemical aspects viz. Specific gravity of fruit (2.07), Titratable Acidity (0.43%), Ascorbic acid (10.80mg/100g), Total Soluble Solids (14.470 Brix), Total sugars (6.00%), Reducing sugar (4.63%), Non-reducing sugar, (1.91%), of fruits were maximized. When we use with recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 19
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Fruit weight was maximized (101.33g) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranate
Punica granatumt0 - Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Fruit weighte0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 101.33ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fruit weight(101.33g)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Fruit length was maximized (0.53m) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Fruit lengthe0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 0.53me0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fruit length (0.53m)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, fruit diameter was maximized (0.39m) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- fruit diametere0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 0.39me0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit diameter maximum (0.39m)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Fruit volume was maximized (89.67ml) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Fruit volumee0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 89.67mle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fruit volume (89.67ml)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Pericarp thickness was maximized (0.17mm) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Pericarp thicknesse0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 0.17mme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pericarp thickness (0.17mm)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Peel weight was maximized (0.039g) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Peel weighte0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 0.039ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Peel weight(0.039g)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Number of aril/fruit was maximized (302.67) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Number of aril/fruite0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 302.67e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Number of aril/fruit (302.67)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Aril weight was maximized (0.06 g) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Aril weighte0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 0.06 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Aril weight(0.06 g)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Aril length was maximized (0.48) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Aril lengthe0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 0.48e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Aril length (0.48)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Aril diameter was maximized (0.30) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Aril diametere0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 0.30e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Aril diameter (0.30)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Fruit yield g/plant was maximized (435.35g) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Fruit yield g/plante0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 435.35ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fruit yield g/plant (435.35g)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Fruit yield kg/ha was maximized (299.67kg/ha) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Fruit yield kg/hae0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 299.67kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fruit yield kg/ha(299.67kg/ha)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Specific gravity of fruit was maximized (2.07) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Specific gravity of fruite0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 2.07e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Specific gravity of fruit (2.07)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Titratable Acidity was maximized (0.43%) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Titratable Aciditye0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 0.43%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Titratable Acidity (0.43%)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Ascorbic acid was maximized (10.80mg/100g) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Ascorbic acide0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 10.80mg/100ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ascorbic acid (10.80mg/100g)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Total Soluble Solids was maximized (14.470 Brix) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Total Soluble Solidse0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 14.470 Brixe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Total Soluble Solids (14.470 Brix)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Total sugars was maximized (6.00%) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Total sugarse0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 6.00%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Total sugars (6.00%)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Reducing sugar was maximized (4.63%) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Reducing sugare0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 4.63%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Reducing sugar (4.63%)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
Claim · model-written summary
In pomegranate cv. Bhagwa, Non-reducing sugar was maximized (1.91%) with the recommended dose of micronutrients, boron 0.2% plus zinc 0.5%; no comparator is stated.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Material
- Bhagwat0
- Treatment
- recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)e2
- Outcome
- Non-reducing sugare0
- Direction
- maximizede1
- Value
- 1.91%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Non-reducing sugar, (1.91%)”
e1“were maximized”
e2“recommended dose of micronutrients (Boron 0.2%) + (Zinc 0.5%)”
t0“pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), cv. Bhagwa”
The same questions in other papers
boron atom · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →zinc atom · quality: phytochemicals · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →zinc atom · growth · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →boron atom · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →boron atom · growth · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →zinc atom · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →micronutrient · growth · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.