Paper · 2020 · RUDN Journal of Agronomy and Animal Industries

Influence of Bioactivesoil combined fertilizers on yield and quality of spring hard and soft wheat

Alexander Gennadievich Lozhkin; Petr Nikolaevich Malchikov; Natalia Valeryevna Mardaryeva; et al.

12
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The experimental data on effect of Bloom & Grow and Immune System fertilizers on growth, development, yield and grain quality of spring durum and soft wheat in light gray forest soils of the Chuvash Republic are presented. The results of two research years revealed that in plants treated with fertilizers, the growth period ‘seedling-ripening’ is reduced by 7-8 days, height of the treated soft wheat plants exceeded the control variant by 12.5 cm, length of the main spike - by 0.4 cm, number of grains per spike - by 6.1, and grain mass per spike - by 0.23 g. Plants of spring durum wheat treated with micronutrient fertilizers exceeded the control variant by 25.1 cm in plant height, length of the main spike, number of grains in it and grain weight significantly exceeded the control variant. The 1000 seed mass exceeded the control variant by 7.28 grams. The increase in the yield of spring soft wheat was 0.89 t/ha (26.3%), and durum wheat - 0.93 t/ha (28.6%). Application of Bloom & Grow and Immune System fertilizers led to an increase in gluten content in spring soft and durum wheat grains, and an improvement in gluten deformation rate to group 1 with the accumulation of minerals.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized wheat had a seedling-to-ripening period shorter by 7-8 days.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
fertilizerse0
Outcome
growth period ‘seedling-ripening’e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7-8 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in plants treated with fertilizers, the growth period ‘seedling-ripening’ is reduced by 7-8 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated soft wheat plants were 12.5 cm taller than controls.

Taxon
soft wheate0
Treatment
treatede0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
12.5 cme0
Comparator
control variante0

Verbatim

e0

“height of the treated soft wheat plants exceeded the control variant by 12.5 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated soft wheat had 0.4 cm longer main spikes than controls.

Taxon
soft wheate1
Treatment
fertilizerse1
Outcome
length of the main spikee0
Value
0.4 cme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“length of the main spike - by 0.4 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–486 · show in text ↑
e1

“The experimental data on effect of Bloom & Grow and Immune System fertilizers on growth, development, yield and grain quality of spring durum and soft wheat in light gray forest soils of the Chuvash Republic are presented.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated soft wheat had 6.1 more grains per spike than controls.

Taxon
soft wheate1
Treatment
fertilizerse1
Outcome
number of grains per spikee0
Value
6.1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“number of grains per spike - by 6.1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–523 · show in text ↑
e1

“The experimental data on effect of Bloom & Grow and Immune System fertilizers on growth, development, yield and grain quality of spring durum and soft wheat in light gray forest soils of the Chuvash Republic are presented.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated soft wheat had 0.23 g more grain mass per spike than controls.

Taxon
soft wheate1
Treatment
fertilizerse1
Outcome
grain mass per spikee0
Value
0.23 ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“grain mass per spike - by 0.23 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–561 · show in text ↑
e1

“The experimental data on effect of Bloom & Grow and Immune System fertilizers on growth, development, yield and grain quality of spring durum and soft wheat in light gray forest soils of the Chuvash Republic are presented.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized durum wheat plants were 25.1 cm taller than controls.

Taxon
spring durum wheatTriticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
micronutrient fertilizerse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
25.1 cme0
Comparator
control variante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants of spring durum wheat treated with micronutrient fertilizers exceeded the control variant by 25.1 cm in plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized durum wheat had significantly greater main-spike length, grain number and grain weight than controls.

Taxon
spring durume1
Treatment
fertilizerse1
Outcome
length of the main spike, number of grains in it and grain weighte0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
control variante0

Verbatim

e0

“length of the main spike, number of grains in it and grain weight significantly exceeded the control variant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“The experimental data on effect of Bloom & Grow and Immune System fertilizers on growth, development, yield and grain quality of spring durum and soft wheat in light gray forest soils of the Chuvash Republic are presented.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized durum wheat had 7.28 grams greater 1000 seed mass than controls.

Taxon
spring durume1
Treatment
fertilizerse1
Outcome
1000 seed masse0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
7.28 gramse0
Comparator
control variante0

Verbatim

e0

“The 1000 seed mass exceeded the control variant by 7.28 grams.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–860 · show in text ↑
e1

“The experimental data on effect of Bloom & Grow and Immune System fertilizers on growth, development, yield and grain quality of spring durum and soft wheat in light gray forest soils of the Chuvash Republic are presented.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization increased soft wheat yield by 0.89 t/ha (26.3%).

Taxon
spring soft wheate0
Treatment
fertilizerse1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.89 t/ha (26.3%)e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in the yield of spring soft wheat was 0.89 t/ha (26.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–929 · show in text ↑
e1

“The experimental data on effect of Bloom & Grow and Immune System fertilizers on growth, development, yield and grain quality of spring durum and soft wheat in light gray forest soils of the Chuvash Republic are presented.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization increased durum wheat yield by 0.93 t/ha (28.6%).

Treatment
fertilizerse1
Outcome
yielde1
Value
0.93 t/ha (28.6%)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat - 0.93 t/ha (28.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–966 · show in text ↑
e1

“The experimental data on effect of Bloom & Grow and Immune System fertilizers on growth, development, yield and grain quality of spring durum and soft wheat in light gray forest soils of the Chuvash Republic are presented.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bloom & Grow and Immune System fertilizers increased grain gluten content in soft and durum wheat.

Taxon
spring soft and durum wheate0
Treatment
Bloom & Grow and Immune System fertilizerse0
Outcome
gluten contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Bloom & Grow and Immune System fertilizers led to an increase in gluten content in spring soft and durum wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizers improved gluten deformation rate to group 1 with mineral accumulation.

Treatment
fertilizerse1
Outcome
gluten deformation ratee0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
group 1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an improvement in gluten deformation rate to group 1 with the accumulation of minerals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1192 · show in text ↑
e1

“The experimental data on effect of Bloom & Grow and Immune System fertilizers on growth, development, yield and grain quality of spring durum and soft wheat in light gray forest soils of the Chuvash Republic are presented.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results differ

79 papers: 68 positive, 11 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 32 positive, 7 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

micronutrient · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.