Paper · 2020 · Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Agriculture

Using Soil and Foliar Applications of some Fertilizers to Improve the Yield and Quality Parameters of Table Grapes (Vitis vinifera L.)

Hisham ABO-AHMEDEH; Amer MHASNEH; Hamzeh RAWASHDEH

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The objective of the current study was to investigate the effect of soil and foliar application of some fertilizers on the yield and quality of table grapes cv. Alkdarri. Soil and foliar fertilizer application treatments included a control, Ca 200 g/vine, K 150 g/vine, N 200 g/vine, Ca 30 g/L, grow more INC fertilizer 10 g/L, K 20 g/L, and Cu 5 mg/L. Results indicate that soil and foliar fertilizer application increases quality and quantity of table grapes compared to control treatment. The highest berry diameter, a weight of 100 berries and a size of 100 berries were obtained in vines treated with Ca 200 g/vine, using the soil application method. The highest cluster weight was obtained in vines that were treated with K 150 g/vine, using the soil application method. The highest berry firmness was obtained in vines that were treated with K 20 g/L using the foliar application method. The highest pH and TSS were obtained in vines treated with Cu 5 mg/L, using the foliar application method. The highest fruit yield was found in vines that were treated with 150 g K.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer application increased table grape quality and quantity compared with control.

Taxon
table grapese0
Treatment
soil and foliar fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
quality and quantitye0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“soil and foliar fertilizer application increases quality and quantity of table grapes compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-applied Ca at 200 g/vine produced the highest berry diameter, 100-berry weight and 100-berry size.

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
Ca 200 g/vinee0
Outcome
berry diameter, a weight of 100 berries and a size of 100 berriese0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
soil application methode0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest berry diameter, a weight of 100 berries and a size of 100 berries were obtained in vines treated with Ca 200 g/vine, using the soil application method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-applied K at 150 g/vine produced the highest cluster weight.

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
K 150 g/vinee0
Outcome
cluster weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
soil application methode0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest cluster weight was obtained in vines that were treated with K 150 g/vine, using the soil application method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar K at 20 g/L produced the highest berry firmness.

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
K 20 g/Le0
Outcome
berry firmnesse0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
foliar application methode0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest berry firmness was obtained in vines that were treated with K 20 g/L using the foliar application method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Cu at 5 mg/L produced the highest pH and TSS.

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
Cu 5 mg/Le0
Outcome
pH and TSSe0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
foliar application methode0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest pH and TSS were obtained in vines treated with Cu 5 mg/L, using the foliar application method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment with 150 g K produced the highest fruit yield.

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
150 g Ke0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest fruit yield was found in vines that were treated with 150 g K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–114 · show in text ↑

copper atom · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium atom · growth · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

potassium · yield · VitisResults differ

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

32 papers: 26 positive, 6 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

38 papers: 28 positive, 10 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

potassium · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.