Paper · 2020 · Sustainability

Effects of Drought Stress on Some Agronomic and Morpho-Physiological Traits in Durum Wheat Genotypes

Alireza Pour-Aboughadareh; Reza Mohammadi; Alireza Etminan; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
121
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Durum wheat performance in the Mediterranean climate is limited when water scarcity occurs before and during anthesis. The present research was performed to determine the effect of drought stress on several physiological and agro-morphological traits in 17 durum wheat genotypes under two conditions (control and drought) over two years. The results of analysis of variance indicated that the various durum wheat genotypes responded differently to drought stress. Drought stress significantly reduced the grain filling period, plant height, peduncle length, number of spikes per plot, number of grains per spike, thousand grains weight, grain yield, biomass, and harvest index in all genotypes compared to the control condition. The heatmap-based correlation analysis indicated that grain yield was positively and significantly associated with phenological characters (days to heading, days to physiological maturity, and grain filling period), as well as number of spikes per plant, biomass, and harvest index under drought conditions. The yield-based drought and susceptible indices revealed that stress tolerance index (STI), geometric mean productivity (GMP), mean productivity (MP), and harmonic mean (HM) were positively and significantly correlated with grain yields in both conditions. Based on the average of the sum of ranks across all indices and a three-dimensional plot, two genotypes (G9 and G12) along with the control variety (G1) were identified as the most tolerant genotypes. Among the investigated genotypes, the new breeding genotype G12 showed a high drought tolerance and yield performance under both conditions. Hence, this genotype can be a candidate for further multi-years and locations test as recommended for cultivation under rainfed conditions in arid and semi-arid regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Durum wheat genotypes differed in drought response.

Outcome
responded differently to drought stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“various durum wheat genotypes responded differently to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced grain filling period, plant height and peduncle length.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
grain filling period, plant height, peduncle lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced the grain filling period, plant height, peduncle length, number of spikes per plot, number of grains per spike, thousand grains weight, grain yield, biomass, and harvest index in all genotypes compared to the control condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of Drought Stress on Some Agronomic and Morpho-Physiological Traits in Durum Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced spikes per plot, grains per spike and thousand grain weight.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
number of spikes per plot, number of grains per spike, thousand grains weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced the grain filling period, plant height, peduncle length, number of spikes per plot, number of grains per spike, thousand grains weight, grain yield, biomass, and harvest index in all genotypes compared to the control condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of Drought Stress on Some Agronomic and Morpho-Physiological Traits in Durum Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced grain yield, biomass and harvest index.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
grain yield, biomass, and harvest indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced the grain filling period, plant height, peduncle length, number of spikes per plot, number of grains per spike, thousand grains weight, grain yield, biomass, and harvest index in all genotypes compared to the control condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of Drought Stress on Some Agronomic and Morpho-Physiological Traits in Durum Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was positively associated with phenological characters under drought.

Organ / stage
grain filling periode0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
positivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield was positively and significantly associated with phenological characters (days to heading, days to physiological maturity, and grain filling period)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of Drought Stress on Some Agronomic and Morpho-Physiological Traits in Durum Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was positively associated with spikes per plant, biomass and harvest index under drought.

Outcome
grain yielde1
Setting
drought conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as well as number of spikes per plant, biomass, and harvest index under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of Drought Stress on Some Agronomic and Morpho-Physiological Traits in Durum Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought stress significantly reduced the grain filling period, plant height, peduncle length, number of spikes per plot, number of grains per spike, thousand grains weight, grain yield, biomass, and harvest index in all genotypes compared to the control condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–727 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

STI, GMP, MP and HM correlated positively with yields under control and drought.

Material
durum wheatt0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
positivelye0
Qualifier
both conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stress tolerance index (STI), geometric mean productivity (GMP), mean productivity (MP), and harmonic mean (HM) were positively and significantly correlated with grain yields in both conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of Drought Stress on Some Agronomic and Morpho-Physiological Traits in Durum Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G9 and G12 were identified among the most drought tolerant genotypes.

Material
G9 and G12e0
Outcome
most tolerant genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two genotypes (G9 and G12) along with the control variety (G1) were identified as the most tolerant genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1493 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of Drought Stress on Some Agronomic and Morpho-Physiological Traits in Durum Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G12 showed high drought tolerance and yield in both conditions.

Material
G12e0
Outcome
high drought tolerance and yield performancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the new breeding genotype G12 showed a high drought tolerance and yield performance under both conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1634 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of Drought Stress on Some Agronomic and Morpho-Physiological Traits in Durum Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend testing G12 for rainfed cultivation.

Outcome
recommended for cultivation under rainfed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this genotype can be a candidate for further multi-years and locations test as recommended for cultivation under rainfed conditions in arid and semi-arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of Drought Stress on Some Agronomic and Morpho-Physiological Traits in Durum Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 6 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.