Paper · 2020 · Applied Ecology and Environmental Research

FOLIAR SULPHUR APPLICATION AND ITS TIMINGS IMPROVE WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) PRODUCTIVITY IN SEMIARID CLIMATE

S.A.A. SHAH; I.A. MIAN; M. SHARIF; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Sulphur fertilization is beneficial for improving growth, yield and yield determining components of field crops under a semiarid climate. The present field experiment was conducted to investigate the response to the foliar application of sulphur at various phenological stages of wheat. For this purpose, five treatments were explored i.e., control (no spray); water spray; 7.5 kg S ha -1 ; 15 kg S ha -1 ; 21 kg S ha -1 . The results revealed that the application of foliar sulphur at the rate of 15 kg ha -1 increased the yield components (grain yield and biological yield) of wheat by 31 and 9% compared to control. The following trend (15 kg S ha -1 > 21 kg S ha -1 > 7.5 kg S ha -1 > water spray > control) was observed for the yield components. Conversely, the application of sulphur at 21 kg ha -1 increased the concentration of sulphur in soil and plant by 104 and 195% respectively, compared to control. A positive linear relationship was observed between soil sulphur and grain yield of wheat (R 2 = 0.76 and P < 0.0001). Furthermore, it was observed that the growth and yield of wheat increased significantly when foliar sulphur was applied in two equal splits (50% each at tillering and booting) compared to the full application at tillering and booting. It was inferred from this study that application of foliar sulphur at the rate of 15 kg ha -1 in two equal splits (50% each at tillering and booting) improves growth and productivity of wheat in the semiarid climate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sulphur at 15 kg ha -1 increased wheat grain yield by 31% relative to control.

Treatment
foliar sulphur at the rate of 15 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
31e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the application of foliar sulphur at the rate of 15 kg ha -1 increased the yield components (grain yield and biological yield) of wheat by 31 and 9% compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sulphur at 15 kg ha -1 increased wheat biological yield by 9% relative to control.

Treatment
foliar sulphur at the rate of 15 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the application of foliar sulphur at the rate of 15 kg ha -1 increased the yield components (grain yield and biological yield) of wheat by 31 and 9% compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–618 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield components ranked 15 kg S ha -1 above 21 kg S ha -1, 7.5 kg S ha -1, water spray and control.

Taxon
WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Outcome
yield componentse0
Qualifier
15 kg S ha -1 > 21 kg S ha -1 > 7.5 kg S ha -1 > water spray > controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“The following trend (15 kg S ha -1 > 21 kg S ha -1 > 7.5 kg S ha -1 > water spray > control) was observed for the yield components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–750 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 21 kg ha -1 increased soil sulphur concentration by 104% relative to control.

Taxon
WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sulphur at 21 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
concentration of sulphur in soile0
Direction
increasede0
Value
104e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the application of sulphur at 21 kg ha -1 increased the concentration of sulphur in soil and plant by 104 and 195% respectively, compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 21 kg ha -1 increased plant sulphur concentration by 195% relative to control.

Taxon
WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sulphur at 21 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
concentration of sulphur in soil and plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
195%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the application of sulphur at 21 kg ha -1 increased the concentration of sulphur in soil and plant by 104 and 195% respectively, compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–912 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil sulphur had a positive linear relationship with wheat grain yield (R 2 = 0.76, P < 0.0001).

Compound
soil sulphure0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Value
R 2 = 0.76e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“A positive linear relationship was observed between soil sulphur and grain yield of wheat (R 2 = 0.76 and P < 0.0001).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Splitting foliar sulphur equally between tillering and booting significantly increased wheat growth and yield compared with full application at either stage.

Treatment
foliar sulphur was applied in two equal splits (50% each at tillering and booting)e0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
full application at tillering and bootinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the growth and yield of wheat increased significantly when foliar sulphur was applied in two equal splits (50% each at tillering and booting) compared to the full application at tillering and booting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1266 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend foliar sulphur at 15 kg ha -1 in two equal splits at tillering and booting for wheat productivity in a semiarid climate.

Outcome
application of foliar sulphur at the rate of 15 kg ha -1 in two equal splits (50% each at tillering and booting)e0
Setting
semiarid climatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of foliar sulphur at the rate of 15 kg ha -1 in two equal splits (50% each at tillering and booting) improves growth and productivity of wheat in the semiarid climate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1483 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.