Abstract
The interaction of the fungus, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum (FOV), and the nematode, Meloidogyne incognita , on wilt disease on “Essoumtem” and Clemson spineless okra varieties, was examined in pot and field experiments from September 2016 to June 2017, in the University of Ghana farms. Four-week-old “Essoumtem” and Clemson spineless seedlings for pot experiment and one-week-old “Essoumtem” and Clemson spineless seedlings for field experiment were inoculated with fungus, Fusarium oxysporum , and nematode, Meloidogyne incognita . The individual, simultaneous, and sequential inoculation of second stage juveniles (at 1000 J 2 /kg soil) of Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum (1.1 × 10 6 cells/kg soil) resulted in significant reduced plant growth parameters (plant height, plant girth, chlorophyll content, fresh and dry shoot weights, and fresh and dry root weights). Maximum suppression in plant growth parameters was observed in plants that received NF21 ( Fusarium oxysporum inoculated 21 days after Meloidogyne incognita on okra) and F 21 (fungus inoculated 21 days after seedling emergence) treatments for pot and field experiments, respectively. The least suppression of plant growth parameters was observed in separate inoculations of the two pathogens for both pot and field experiments. Maximum suppression in yield parameters was observed in okra plants that received NF21 and F 21 treatments for pot and field experiments, respectively. Minimal yield suppression was observed for individual inoculations ( N and F treatments) in both pot and field experiments. The highest severity of wilt disease was observed on okra plants that received NF21 and F 21 treatment in both pot and field experiments. Plants in control plots had higher yields and the least wilt incidences (0.0%).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Pathogen inoculations significantly reduced okra growth traits.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- individual, simultaneous, and sequential inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Second interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum
_(Fusarium_oxysporum_f.sp._batatas)_1234227-PPT-Clemson_University.jpg?width=60)
Fusarium oxysporume0pathogen - Outcome
- plant height, plant girth, chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
_(Fusarium_oxysporum_f.sp._batatas)_1234227-PPT-Clemson_University.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The individual, simultaneous, and sequential inoculation of second stage juveniles (at 1000 J 2 /kg soil) of Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum (1.1 × 10 6 cells/kg soil) resulted in significant reduced plant growth parameters (plant height, plant girth, chlorophyll content, fresh and dry shoot weights, and fresh and dry root weights).”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Pathogen inoculations significantly reduced shoot and root weights.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- individual, simultaneous, and sequential inoculatione0
- Outcome
- fresh and dry shoot weights, and fresh and dry root weightse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The individual, simultaneous, and sequential inoculation of second stage juveniles (at 1000 J 2 /kg soil) of Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum (1.1 × 10 6 cells/kg soil) resulted in significant reduced plant growth parameters (plant height, plant girth, chlorophyll content, fresh and dry shoot weights, and fresh and dry root weights).”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
NF21 and F 21 caused maximum growth suppression in pot and field trials respectively.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- NF21e0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- Fusarium oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
- Outcome
- suppression in plant growth parameterse0
- Direction
- Maximum suppressione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum suppression in plant growth parameters was observed in plants that received NF21 ( Fusarium oxysporum inoculated 21 days after Meloidogyne incognita on okra) and F 21 (fungus inoculated 21 days after seedling emergence) treatments for pot and field experiments, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Separate inoculations caused the least growth suppression.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- separate inoculationse0
- Outcome
- suppression of plant growth parameterse0
- Direction
- least suppressione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The least suppression of plant growth parameters was observed in separate inoculations of the two pathogens for both pot and field experiments.”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
NF21 and F 21 caused maximum yield suppression in pot and field trials respectively.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- NF21 and F 21 treatmentse0
- Outcome
- suppression in yield parameterse0
- Direction
- Maximum suppressione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum suppression in yield parameters was observed in okra plants that received NF21 and F 21 treatments for pot and field experiments, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Individual inoculations caused minimal yield suppression.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- individual inoculationse0
- Outcome
- yield suppressione0
- Direction
- Minimale0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Minimal yield suppression was observed for individual inoculations ( N and F treatments) in both pot and field experiments.”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
NF21 and F 21 had the highest wilt severity.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- NF21 and F 21 treatmente0
- Outcome
- severity of wilt diseasee0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest severity of wilt disease was observed on okra plants that received NF21 and F 21 treatment in both pot and field experiments.”
Claim · model-written summary
Control plots had higher yields.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- control plotse0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plants in control plots had higher yields and the least wilt incidences (0.0%).”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Control plots had 0.0% wilt incidence.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- control plotse0
- Outcome
- wilt incidencese0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Value
- 0.0%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plants in control plots had higher yields and the least wilt incidences (0.0%).”
t0“Okra”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.