Abstract
Inoculation of Paecilomyces lilacinus at different levels along with Meloidogyne incognita on okra showed that plant growth and yield increased with the increase of inoculum level of P. lilacinus and an inoculum level of 4 g fungus culture (on rice grain husk medium) per kg soil was optimum to reduce nematode attack with a population level of 500 juveniles per kg soil. Growth of plant and yield of okra were suppressed when inoculation of the nematode preceeded fungus inoculation. On the other hand, when the fungus could attack the plant before nematode inoculation or simultaneously with the nematodes, suppressive effect of M. incognita was reduced. Egg mass production of the nematode was also reduced in these treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Okra plant growth and yield increased as the inoculum level of Paecilomyces lilacinus increased in the presence of Meloidogyne incognita.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentuse0 - Treatment
- Inoculation of Paecilomyces lilacinus at different levelse0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Second interactor
- Paecilomyces lilacinus
Purpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- plant growth and yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of Paecilomyces lilacinus at different levels along with Meloidogyne incognita on okra”
e1“plant growth and yield increased with the increase of inoculum level of P. lilacinus”
Claim · model-written summary
An inoculum level of 4 g fungus culture per kg soil was optimum to reduce nematode attack at 500 juveniles per kg soil.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- inoculum level of 4 g fungus culture (on rice grain husk medium) per kg soile1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- Paecilomyces lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- nematode attacke1
- Direction
- reducee1
- Qualifier
- population level of 500 juveniles per kg soile1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of Paecilomyces lilacinus at different levels along with Meloidogyne incognita on okra”
e1“an inoculum level of 4 g fungus culture (on rice grain husk medium) per kg soil was optimum to reduce nematode attack with a population level of 500 juveniles per kg soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Okra growth and yield were suppressed when nematode inoculation preceded fungus inoculation.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- inoculation of the nematode preceeded fungus inoculatione1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- Paecilomyces lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- Growth of plant and yielde1
- Direction
- suppressede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of Paecilomyces lilacinus at different levels along with Meloidogyne incognita on okra”
e1“Growth of plant and yield of okra were suppressed when inoculation of the nematode preceeded fungus inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
When the fungus attacked the plant before or simultaneously with nematode inoculation, the suppressive effect of M. incognita was reduced.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- the fungus could attack the plant before nematode inoculation or simultaneously with the nematodese1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- Paecilomyces lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- suppressive effect of M. incognitae1
- Direction
- reducede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of Paecilomyces lilacinus at different levels along with Meloidogyne incognita on okra”
e1“when the fungus could attack the plant before nematode inoculation or simultaneously with the nematodes, suppressive effect of M. incognita was reduced”
Claim · model-written summary
Egg mass production of the nematode was also reduced in these treatments.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- Paecilomyces lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- Egg mass production of the nematodee1
- Direction
- reducede1
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of Paecilomyces lilacinus at different levels along with Meloidogyne incognita on okra”
e1“Egg mass production of the nematode was also reduced in these treatments”
The same questions in other papers
Purpureocillium lilacinum · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →in vitro · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
inoculation · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.