Paper · 2020 · Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science

An Evaluation of Biopesticide Combinations on Yield Performance and Disease/Arthropod Control of Strawberries Grown in High Tunnel Plasticulture Production Systems in Arkansas.

Karlee B. Pruitt

10
claims
27
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nd

Abstract

This two-year study investigated combinations of biopesticides to determine impacts on strawberry fruit marketable fruit yields, and effectiveness in controlling strawberry pests in a high tunnel production system at the University of Arkansas, Division of Agriculture Research and Extension Center in Fayetteville, Arkansas. Two strawberry cultivars Fragaria × ananassa (Duch.), Camino Real and Sweet Sensation were grown in a high tunnel from early-October to mid-May for two consecutive growing seasons, (2017-18 and 2018-19) with six treatment combinations of biopesticides including an untreated (water) control, nutrient spray and selected biological based fungicides and insecticides, arranged into a split-plot randomized block design. The cost associated with each biopesticide treatment combination was calculated based on the number of times applied to the specific area of the study and the cost of the products. Relative humidity, daily light integral (DLI) and growing degree days (GDD) were also recorded to show differences between the two growing seasons. During the 2018 season, the control (water) treatment numerically had the highest total and marketable fruit weight, but was not significantly different from any biopesticide treatment. No significant effects of biopesticide treatment were observed during the 2019 season on fruit yield or quality, thus indicating that there was no clear advantage to any of the treatments on improving fruit marketability. The biopesticide combination treatments were also evaluated for their impacts of four high tunnel pests of strawberry, powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun and S. Takam. (formerly Sphaerotheca macularis (Wall. Ex Fries) Jacz f. sp. Fragariae (Peries))), gray mold (Botrytis cinerea), two-spotted spider mites (Tetranychus urticae (Koch) (Acari: Tetranychidae)), and strawberry aphids (Chaetosiphon fragaefolii (Cockerell) (Homoptera: Aphididae)). Disease incidence for 2018 was less than 16% for powdery mildew and less than 25% for gray mold. Powdery mildew in 2019 had less than 1% of disease incidence and gray mold had less than 2% disease incidence. In 2018, two-spotted spider mite populations were greater than the economic threshold of 5 mites per leaflet, but populations remained below the economic threshold in 2019. Strawberry aphid populations were not present in either harvest season. Overall findings point to the evaluated combinations of biopesticides not having a significant effect on fruit marketability or disease/arthropod control. These findings indicate that the tested combinations should not be used by producers to control pests or improve marketable yield of strawberries in high tunnels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2018, the untreated water control numerically had the highest total and marketable fruit weight but did not differ significantly from any biopesticide treatment.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
biopesticide treatmente1
Outcome
total and marketable fruit weighte1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
not significantly different from any biopesticide treatmente1
Comparator
control (water)e1
Setting
2018 seasone1

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“impacts on strawberry fruit marketable fruit yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“During the 2018 season, the control (water) treatment numerically had the highest total and marketable fruit weight, but was not significantly different from any biopesticide treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2019, biopesticide treatment had no significant effect on strawberry fruit yield or quality compared with the untreated control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
biopesticide treatmente2
Outcome
fruit yield or qualitye2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
untreated (water) controle3
Setting
2019 seasone2

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“impacts on strawberry fruit marketable fruit yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–127 · show in text ↑
e2

“No significant effects of biopesticide treatment were observed during the 2019 season on fruit yield or quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1370 · show in text ↑
e3

“six treatment combinations of biopesticides including an untreated (water) control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–616 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Powdery mildew incidence on strawberry was below 16% in 2018.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Interactor
powdery mildewe4pathogen
Outcome
Disease incidencee4
Value
less than 16%e4
Setting
2018e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“impacts on strawberry fruit marketable fruit yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–127 · show in text ↑
e4

“Disease incidence for 2018 was less than 16% for powdery mildew and less than 25% for gray mold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1945–2040 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gray mold incidence on strawberry was below 25% in 2018.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae5pathogen
Outcome
Disease incidencee4
Value
less than 25%e4
Setting
2018e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“impacts on strawberry fruit marketable fruit yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–127 · show in text ↑
e4

“Disease incidence for 2018 was less than 16% for powdery mildew and less than 25% for gray mold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1945–2040 · show in text ↑
e5

“gray mold (Botrytis cinerea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1752–1780 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Powdery mildew incidence on strawberry was below 1% in 2019.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Interactor
powdery mildewe6pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee6
Value
less than 1%e6
Setting
2019e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“impacts on strawberry fruit marketable fruit yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–127 · show in text ↑
e6

“Powdery mildew in 2019 had less than 1% of disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2042–2102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gray mold incidence on strawberry was below 2% in 2019.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae5pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee7
Value
less than 2%e7
Setting
2019e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“impacts on strawberry fruit marketable fruit yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–127 · show in text ↑
e5

“gray mold (Botrytis cinerea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1752–1780 · show in text ↑
e6

“Powdery mildew in 2019 had less than 1% of disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2042–2102 · show in text ↑
e7

“gray mold had less than 2% disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2107–2151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2018, two-spotted spider mite populations on strawberry were greater than the economic threshold of 5 mites per leaflet.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Interactor
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee1pest
Outcome
two-spotted spider mite populationse2
Value
5 mites per leaflete2
Qualifier
greater than the economic thresholde2
Setting
2018e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“impacts on strawberry fruit marketable fruit yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-spotted spider mites (Tetranychus urticae (Koch) (Acari: Tetranychidae))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1858 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 2018, two-spotted spider mite populations were greater than the economic threshold of 5 mites per leaflet, but populations remained below the economic threshold in 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2153–2324 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2019, two-spotted spider mite populations on strawberry remained below the economic threshold.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Interactor
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee1pest
Outcome
populationse2
Qualifier
below the economic thresholde2
Setting
2019e2

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“impacts on strawberry fruit marketable fruit yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-spotted spider mites (Tetranychus urticae (Koch) (Acari: Tetranychidae))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1858 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 2018, two-spotted spider mite populations were greater than the economic threshold of 5 mites per leaflet, but populations remained below the economic threshold in 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2153–2324 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberry aphid populations were not present in either harvest season.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Interactor
Chaetosiphon fragaefoliiChaetosiphon fragaefoliie1pest
Outcome
aphid populationse2
Qualifier
not present in either harvest seasone2

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“impacts on strawberry fruit marketable fruit yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry aphids (Chaetosiphon fragaefolii (Cockerell) (Homoptera: Aphididae))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1864–1943 · show in text ↑
e2

“Strawberry aphid populations were not present in either harvest season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2326–2396 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The tested biopesticide combinations should not be used by producers to control pests or improve marketable yield of strawberries in high tunnels.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassae1
Outcome
should not be used by producers to control pests or improve marketable yielde1
Setting
high tunnelse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“impacts on strawberry fruit marketable fruit yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“the tested combinations should not be used by producers to control pests or improve marketable yield of strawberries in high tunnels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2582–2714 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biocontrol · quality: general · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.