Paper · 2021 · Phytopathology

Bee-Vectored Aureobasidium pullulans for Biological Control of Gray Mold in Strawberry

Mudassir Iqbal; Matilda Jützeler; Soraya C. França; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea is a common postharvest disease in strawberries, reducing shelf life considerably. We investigated the potential of the yeast-like biocontrol fungus Aureobasidium pullulans (AP-SLU6) vectored by bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) in the Flying Doctors ® system to inhibit the pathogen and increase the shelf life of harvested strawberries (cultivar Sonata). Using bumblebees as vectors of various biocontrol agents is becoming increasingly popular, but any potentially negative effects on bee performance have been understudied. Our results show that, over the 4-week period of the trial, the performance and activity of the bees were not negatively affected by A. pullulans. The bees successfully picked up the powder formulation; then, they carried and deposited it on the flowers. The vectoring of the biocontrol agent significantly reduced gray mold development on the harvested fruits by 45% and increased shelf life by 100% in comparison with control treatments. This suggests that the biocontrol fungus applied during flowering successfully reduced Botrytis infection and thus, effectively protected the fruits from gray mold. In addition, the bee-vectored application of the biocontrol agent was found to be significantly more effective than spray application because the latter may temporarily increase humidity around the flower, thereby creating a suitable environment for the pathogen to thrive. In summary, our study demonstrates that A. pullulans vectored by bumblebees can decrease gray mold infection and improve the shelf life of strawberries without adversely affecting the bees, thus providing a basis for the sustainable and efficient control of gray mold on strawberry. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0 International license .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. pullulans did not negatively affect bee performance and activity over four weeks.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Interactor
A. pullulansAureobasidium pullulanse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
performance and activity of the beese0
Direction
not negatively affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aureobasidium pullulans
Aureobasidium pullulans · InteractorThis image was created by user Tom Volk (TomVolk) at Mushroom Observer , a source for mycological images. You can contact this user here . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“over the 4-week period of the trial, the performance and activity of the bees were not negatively affected by A. pullulans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bees picked up the formulation and deposited it on strawberry flowers.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
flowerse0
Interactor
beesAnthophilae0pollinator
Outcome
carried and deposited it on the flowerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bees successfully picked up the powder formulation; then, they carried and deposited it on the flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bee vectoring reduced harvested-fruit gray mold development 45% relative to controls.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
harvested fruitse0
Treatment
vectoring of the biocontrol agente0
Outcome
gray mold development on the harvested fruitse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
45%e0
Comparator
control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The vectoring of the biocontrol agent significantly reduced gray mold development on the harvested fruits by 45% and increased shelf life by 100% in comparison with control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bee vectoring increased strawberry shelf life by 100% relative to controls.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
vectoring of the biocontrol agente0
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
100%e0
Comparator
control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The vectoring of the biocontrol agent significantly reduced gray mold development on the harvested fruits by 45% and increased shelf life by 100% in comparison with control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bee-vectored application was more effective than spray application.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
bee-vectored application of the biocontrol agente0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
spray applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the bee-vectored application of the biocontrol agent was found to be significantly more effective than spray application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–86 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biocontrol · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.