Paper · 2020 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato under different integrated management options against Tuta absoluta Meyrick

Ndereyimana, Assinapol; Nyalala, Samuel; Murerwa, Patrick; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of entomopathogens and plant extracts, used against Tuta absoluta, on growth, yield, and fruit quality of tomato. Two field trials were carried out in a randomised compled block design, replicated thrice. The treatments were Steinernema sp. RW14­M­C2a­3, Steinernema sp. RW14­M­C2a­3, Metatech®WP (Metarhizium anisopliae, Strain FCM Ar 23B3), Beauvitech®WP (Beauveria bassiana, Strain J25) as entomopathogens, Tephrosia vogelii and Phytolacca dodecandra as plant extracts, and azadirachtin 0.03% EC. Imidacloprid and water also were included as positive and negative controls, respectively. The best growth and yield parameters were recorded with the entomopathogens and azadirachtin, which were insignificantly different in most cases. The increase in yied of healthy fruit per plant (average of two trials) compared to the negative control (water spray) was 11.4, 10.8,10.1, 9.6, 3.96, 2.2, 11.7 and 2.4 folds for Steinernema sp. RW14M­C2a­3, Steinernema sp. RW14­M­C2a­3, Metatech®WP, Beauvitech WP, T. vogelii, P. dodecandra, azadirachtin, and imidacloprid, respectively. There was no significant difference in number of leaves per plant and fruit quality parameters. The entomopathogens and azadirachtin, which exhibited a capacity to enhance tomato growth and reduced yield losses due to T. absoluta, are recommended to be included in integrated pest management programme on tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Entomopathogens and azadirachtin gave the best growth and yield parameters without significant differences in most cases.

Treatment
entomopathogens and azadirachtine0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best growth and yield parameters were recorded with the entomopathogens and azadirachtin, which were insignificantly different in most cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato under different integrated management options against Tuta absoluta Meyrick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First Steinernema treatment raised healthy fruit yield 11.4 fold over water.

Treatment
Steinernema sp. RW14M­C2a­3e0
Interactor
Tuta absoluta MeyrickTuta absolutat0pest
Second interactor
Steinernema sp. RW14M­C2a­3e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yied of healthy fruit per plante0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11.4e0
Comparator
water spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in yied of healthy fruit per plant (average of two trials) compared to the negative control (water spray) was 11.4, 10.8,10.1, 9.6, 3.96, 2.2, 11.7 and 2.4 folds for Steinernema sp. RW14M­C2a­3, Steinernema sp. RW14­M­C2a­3, Metatech®WP, Beauvitech WP, T. vogelii, P. dodecandra, azadirachtin, and imidacloprid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato under different integrated management options against Tuta absoluta Meyrick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second Steinernema treatment raised healthy fruit yield 10.8 fold over water.

Treatment
Steinernema sp. RW14­M­C2a­3e0
Interactor
Tuta absoluta MeyrickTuta absolutat0pest
Second interactor
Steinernema sp. RW14­M­C2a­3e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yied of healthy fruit per plante0
Direction
increasee0
Value
10.8e0
Comparator
water spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in yied of healthy fruit per plant (average of two trials) compared to the negative control (water spray) was 11.4, 10.8,10.1, 9.6, 3.96, 2.2, 11.7 and 2.4 folds for Steinernema sp. RW14M­C2a­3, Steinernema sp. RW14­M­C2a­3, Metatech®WP, Beauvitech WP, T. vogelii, P. dodecandra, azadirachtin, and imidacloprid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato under different integrated management options against Tuta absoluta Meyrick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metatech raised healthy fruit yield 10.1 fold over water.

Treatment
Metatech®WPe0
Interactor
Tuta absoluta MeyrickTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
yied of healthy fruit per plante0
Direction
increasee0
Value
10.1e0
Comparator
water spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in yied of healthy fruit per plant (average of two trials) compared to the negative control (water spray) was 11.4, 10.8,10.1, 9.6, 3.96, 2.2, 11.7 and 2.4 folds for Steinernema sp. RW14M­C2a­3, Steinernema sp. RW14­M­C2a­3, Metatech®WP, Beauvitech WP, T. vogelii, P. dodecandra, azadirachtin, and imidacloprid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato under different integrated management options against Tuta absoluta Meyrick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauvitech raised healthy fruit yield 9.6 fold over water.

Treatment
Beauvitech WPe0
Interactor
Tuta absoluta MeyrickTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
yied of healthy fruit per plante0
Direction
increasee0
Value
9.6e0
Comparator
water spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in yied of healthy fruit per plant (average of two trials) compared to the negative control (water spray) was 11.4, 10.8,10.1, 9.6, 3.96, 2.2, 11.7 and 2.4 folds for Steinernema sp. RW14M­C2a­3, Steinernema sp. RW14­M­C2a­3, Metatech®WP, Beauvitech WP, T. vogelii, P. dodecandra, azadirachtin, and imidacloprid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato under different integrated management options against Tuta absoluta Meyrick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tephrosia extract raised healthy fruit yield 3.96 fold over water.

Treatment
T. vogeliie0
Interactor
Tuta absoluta MeyrickTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
yied of healthy fruit per plante0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.96e0
Comparator
water spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in yied of healthy fruit per plant (average of two trials) compared to the negative control (water spray) was 11.4, 10.8,10.1, 9.6, 3.96, 2.2, 11.7 and 2.4 folds for Steinernema sp. RW14M­C2a­3, Steinernema sp. RW14­M­C2a­3, Metatech®WP, Beauvitech WP, T. vogelii, P. dodecandra, azadirachtin, and imidacloprid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato under different integrated management options against Tuta absoluta Meyrick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytolacca extract raised healthy fruit yield 2.2 fold over water.

Treatment
P. dodecandrae0
Interactor
Tuta absoluta MeyrickTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
yied of healthy fruit per plante0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.2e0
Comparator
water spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in yied of healthy fruit per plant (average of two trials) compared to the negative control (water spray) was 11.4, 10.8,10.1, 9.6, 3.96, 2.2, 11.7 and 2.4 folds for Steinernema sp. RW14M­C2a­3, Steinernema sp. RW14­M­C2a­3, Metatech®WP, Beauvitech WP, T. vogelii, P. dodecandra, azadirachtin, and imidacloprid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato under different integrated management options against Tuta absoluta Meyrick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin raised healthy fruit yield 11.7 fold over water.

Treatment
azadirachtine0
Interactor
Tuta absoluta MeyrickTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
yied of healthy fruit per plante0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11.7e0
Comparator
water spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in yied of healthy fruit per plant (average of two trials) compared to the negative control (water spray) was 11.4, 10.8,10.1, 9.6, 3.96, 2.2, 11.7 and 2.4 folds for Steinernema sp. RW14M­C2a­3, Steinernema sp. RW14­M­C2a­3, Metatech®WP, Beauvitech WP, T. vogelii, P. dodecandra, azadirachtin, and imidacloprid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato under different integrated management options against Tuta absoluta Meyrick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid raised healthy fruit yield 2.4 fold over water.

Treatment
imidaclopride0
Interactor
Tuta absoluta MeyrickTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
yied of healthy fruit per plante0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.4 foldse0
Comparator
water spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in yied of healthy fruit per plant (average of two trials) compared to the negative control (water spray) was 11.4, 10.8,10.1, 9.6, 3.96, 2.2, 11.7 and 2.4 folds for Steinernema sp. RW14M­C2a­3, Steinernema sp. RW14­M­C2a­3, Metatech®WP, Beauvitech WP, T. vogelii, P. dodecandra, azadirachtin, and imidacloprid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato under different integrated management options against Tuta absoluta Meyrick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf number and fruit quality showed no significant differences.

Outcome
number of leaves per plant and fruit quality parameterse0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference in number of leaves per plant and fruit quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend entomopathogens and azadirachtin in tomato pest management.

Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
recommended to be included in integrated pest management programme on tomatoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The entomopathogens and azadirachtin, which exhibited a capacity to enhance tomato growth and reduced yield losses due to T. absoluta, are recommended to be included in integrated pest management programme on tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1413 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Tephrosia vogelii · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Phytolacca dodecandra · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

azadirachtin · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

biocontrol · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.