Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of soil tillage systems on technological characteristics, mineral composition and grain yield of selected hybrid wheat cultivars grown in variable climatic conditions. The following factors were studied: tillage systems, namely conventional (CT), reduced (RT) and no tillage (NT) and hybrid cultivars of winter wheat (Hyfi, Hybiza and Hystar). Cvs. Hyfi and Hybiza were characterised by good technological parameters and protein quality, and additionally by a higher Fe and Zn content and a higher grain yield than cv. Hystar. Meteorological conditions (rainfall total 414.9 mm, mean temperature 8.8 °C) during the growing season caused an increase in the yield of grain, protein, gluten and Zeleny test as well as the total gliadins and glutenins. Higher rainfall reduced grain quality and Fe and Zn content, while precipitation deficits reduced grain yield. Quality parameters and grain yield, as well as total gliadins and glutenins in CT and RT were similar, and significantly higher compared with NT. Soil tillage systems did not differentiate mineral composition, except for the higher content of Fe in CT as well as the content of albumins and globulins, α/β, ω gliadins and low molecular weight (LMW) glutenins and protein fraction ratios in grain.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Hyfi and Hybiza had good technological parameters and protein quality relative to Hystar.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Hyfi and Hybizae0
- Outcome
- technological parameters and protein qualitye0
- Direction
- goode0
- Comparator
- Hystare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cvs. Hyfi and Hybiza were characterised by good technological parameters and protein quality, and additionally by a higher Fe and Zn content and a higher grain yield than cv. Hystar.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Hyfi and Hybiza had higher Fe and Zn content relative to Hystar.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Hyfi and Hybizae0
- Outcome
- Fe and Zn contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- Hystare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cvs. Hyfi and Hybiza were characterised by good technological parameters and protein quality, and additionally by a higher Fe and Zn content and a higher grain yield than cv. Hystar.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Hyfi and Hybiza had higher grain yield relative to Hystar.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Hyfi and Hybizae0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- Hystare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cvs. Hyfi and Hybiza were characterised by good technological parameters and protein quality, and additionally by a higher Fe and Zn content and a higher grain yield than cv. Hystar.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Growing season meteorological conditions increased yield of grain.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- yield of graine0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- rainfall total 414.9 mm, mean temperature 8.8 °Ce0
- Setting
- growing seasone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Meteorological conditions (rainfall total 414.9 mm, mean temperature 8.8 °C) during the growing season caused an increase in the yield of grain, protein, gluten and Zeleny test as well as the total gliadins and glutenins.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Growing season meteorological conditions increased protein, gluten and Zeleny test.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- protein, gluten and Zeleny teste0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- rainfall total 414.9 mm, mean temperature 8.8 °Ce0
- Setting
- growing seasone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Meteorological conditions (rainfall total 414.9 mm, mean temperature 8.8 °C) during the growing season caused an increase in the yield of grain, protein, gluten and Zeleny test as well as the total gliadins and glutenins.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Growing season meteorological conditions increased total gliadins and glutenins.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- total gliadins and gluteninse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- rainfall total 414.9 mm, mean temperature 8.8 °Ce0
- Setting
- growing seasone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Meteorological conditions (rainfall total 414.9 mm, mean temperature 8.8 °C) during the growing season caused an increase in the yield of grain, protein, gluten and Zeleny test as well as the total gliadins and glutenins.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher rainfall reduced grain quality and Fe and Zn content.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Higher rainfalle0
- Outcome
- grain quality and Fe and Zn contente0
- Direction
- reducede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher rainfall reduced grain quality and Fe and Zn content, while precipitation deficits reduced grain yield.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
precipitation deficits reduced grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- precipitation deficitse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher rainfall reduced grain quality and Fe and Zn content, while precipitation deficits reduced grain yield.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
CT and RT were similar and significantly higher than NT for Quality parameters and grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- CT and RTe0
- Outcome
- Quality parameters and grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- NTe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Quality parameters and grain yield, as well as total gliadins and glutenins in CT and RT were similar, and significantly higher compared with NT.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
CT and RT were similar and significantly higher than NT for total gliadins and glutenins.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- CT and RTe0
- Outcome
- total gliadins and gluteninse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- NTe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Quality parameters and grain yield, as well as total gliadins and glutenins in CT and RT were similar, and significantly higher compared with NT.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage systems did not differentiate mineral composition overall.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Soil tillage systemse0
- Outcome
- mineral compositione0
- Direction
- did not differentiatee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soil tillage systems did not differentiate mineral composition, except for the higher content of Fe in CT as well as the content of albumins and globulins, α/β, ω gliadins and low molecular weight (LMW) glutenins and protein fraction ratios in grain.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
CT had higher Fe content in grain.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- CTe0
- Outcome
- Fee0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soil tillage systems did not differentiate mineral composition, except for the higher content of Fe in CT as well as the content of albumins and globulins, α/β, ω gliadins and low molecular weight (LMW) glutenins and protein fraction ratios in grain.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
CT had higher albumins and globulins content in grain.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- CTe0
- Outcome
- albumins and globulinse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soil tillage systems did not differentiate mineral composition, except for the higher content of Fe in CT as well as the content of albumins and globulins, α/β, ω gliadins and low molecular weight (LMW) glutenins and protein fraction ratios in grain.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
CT had higher α/β, ω gliadins and low molecular weight (LMW) glutenins content in grain.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- CTe0
- Outcome
- α/β, ω gliadins and low molecular weight (LMW) gluteninse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soil tillage systems did not differentiate mineral composition, except for the higher content of Fe in CT as well as the content of albumins and globulins, α/β, ω gliadins and low molecular weight (LMW) glutenins and protein fraction ratios in grain.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
CT had higher protein fraction ratios content in grain.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- CTe0
- Outcome
- protein fraction ratiose0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soil tillage systems did not differentiate mineral composition, except for the higher content of Fe in CT as well as the content of albumins and globulins, α/β, ω gliadins and low molecular weight (LMW) glutenins and protein fraction ratios in grain.”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →tillage · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
53 papers more in this group
See all 57 papers →tillage · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
68 papers more in this group
See all 72 papers →tillage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
141 papers more in this group
See all 145 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.