Paper · 2020 · Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias - Brazilian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Agronomic performance of urea in pastilled compositions applied on maize fertilization

W.M. Santos; I. Barros; E.P. Pacheco; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Urea pastillation is a technology that allows the composite mixture with other elements like sulfur and zinc. This study aimed to provide recommendations of N rates, and to assess the agronomic performance of N fertilizers, including pastille urea and its composition associated with S and Zn, top-dressed on maize. Two experiments were set up in the harvests of 2014 and 2015 in an Acrisol and a Lixisol. The experimental design was the randomized blocks with three replicates in a split-plot arrangement and an additional treatment (no N). In the plot, three N applications rates were tested (75, 150 and 300 kg ha-1); while in the subplots, seven fertilizers were tested, including conventional and pastilled ones. The greater was the N rate applied, the higher were the leaf N content and grain yield of maize. The S content in the leaves increased with the increasing S doses applied with the tested fertilizers. Yields with ammonium sulfate were higher than with prilled urea, pastille urea and pastille urea with elemental S in the harvest mean on the Haplic Lixisol. The rate that corresponded to the maximum economic efficiency for UR was 128 and 119 kg N ha-1 for Haplic Acrisol and Haplic Lixisol, respectively. The recommended dose of ammonium sulfate was 119 kg ha-1, since it provided the greater incomes for both sites.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher N rate increased maize leaf N content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
leaf N contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greater was the N rate applied, the higher were the leaf N content and grain yield of maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher N rate increased maize grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greater was the N rate applied, the higher were the leaf N content and grain yield of maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing applied S doses increased leaf S content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increasing S dosese0
Outcome
S content in the leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The S content in the leaves increased with the increasing S doses applied with the tested fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate produced higher yields than prilled urea on Haplic Lixisol.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ammonium sulfatee0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
prilled ureae0
Setting
Haplic Lixisole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields with ammonium sulfate were higher than with prilled urea, pastille urea and pastille urea with elemental S in the harvest mean on the Haplic Lixisol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate produced higher yields than pastille urea on Haplic Lixisol.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ammonium sulfatee0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
pastille ureae0
Setting
Haplic Lixisole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields with ammonium sulfate were higher than with prilled urea, pastille urea and pastille urea with elemental S in the harvest mean on the Haplic Lixisol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate produced higher yields than pastille urea with elemental S on Haplic Lixisol.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ammonium sulfatee0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
pastille urea with elemental Se0
Setting
Haplic Lixisole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields with ammonium sulfate were higher than with prilled urea, pastille urea and pastille urea with elemental S in the harvest mean on the Haplic Lixisol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N rate for maximum economic efficiency of UR was 128 kg N ha-1 on Haplic Acrisol.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
URe0
Outcome
maximum economic efficiencye0
Value
128e0
Setting
Haplic Acrisole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate that corresponded to the maximum economic efficiency for UR was 128 and 119 kg N ha-1 for Haplic Acrisol and Haplic Lixisol, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N rate for maximum economic efficiency of UR was 119 kg N ha-1 on Haplic Lixisol.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
URe0
Outcome
maximum economic efficiencye0
Value
119 kg N ha-1e0
Setting
Haplic Lixisole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate that corresponded to the maximum economic efficiency for UR was 128 and 119 kg N ha-1 for Haplic Acrisol and Haplic Lixisol, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 119 kg ha-1 ammonium sulfate because it gave greater income at both sites.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
recommended dose of ammonium sulfatee0
Value
119 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
greater incomes for both sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The recommended dose of ammonium sulfate was 119 kg ha-1, since it provided the greater incomes for both sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

37 papers: 33 positive, 4 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

ammonium sulfate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

37 papers: 31 positive, 6 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

489 papers: 403 positive, 86 negative or no effect

402 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

485 papers more in this group

See all 489 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.