Paper · 2020 · Agronomy Journal

Biochemical and physiological responses of Cannabis sativa to an integrated plant nutrition system

Jose F. Da Cunha Leme Filho; Wade E. Thomason; Gregory K. Evanylo; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract The illegal status of cannabis ( Cannabis sativa L.) post‐World War II resulted in a lack of research on agricultural practices. However, there is a resurgence of interest in cannabis due to diverse uses such as a rich source of cellulosic/woody fiber and construction uses, seed oil, bioenergy and pharmaceutical properties. The principle of an integrated plant nutrition system (IPNS) is to enable adaptation of plant nutrition and soil fertility management to local site characteristics, attempting to optimize use of inorganic, organic and biological resources. This project investigated the individual and combined use of inorganic, organic and biological fertilizer resources on cannabis before and after a period of moderate water stress. We evaluated the individual and combined effects of commercial synthetic fertilizer, humic acid (HA), manure tea and bioinoculant as inorganic, organic and biological resources, respectively on cannabis growth and physiological parameters. Our hypothesis was that the synergetic effects of HA + biofertilizers would improve cannabis growth. When compared to the control, the application of HA and biofertilizer alone, or in combination, increased plant height, chlorophyll content and photosynthetic efficiency by 55, 8 and 12%, respectively, after water stress. Cannabis biomass of treated plants was rarely different from the control. The combined application of HA + biofertilizer resulted in additive, but not synergistic, increases in measured parameter. Future research should focus on the effects of biostimulants on CBD/THC content due to the potential impact on the production of secondary metabolites in plants under stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid and biofertilizer, alone or combined, increased cannabis plant height by 55% relative to the control after water stress.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
application of HA and biofertilizer alone, or in combinatione0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
55e0
Qualifier
after water stresse0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When compared to the control, the application of HA and biofertilizer alone, or in combination, increased plant height, chlorophyll content and photosynthetic efficiency by 55, 8 and 12%, respectively, after water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid and biofertilizer, alone or combined, increased cannabis chlorophyll content by 8% relative to the control after water stress.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
application of HA and biofertilizer alone, or in combinatione0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8e0
Qualifier
after water stresse0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When compared to the control, the application of HA and biofertilizer alone, or in combination, increased plant height, chlorophyll content and photosynthetic efficiency by 55, 8 and 12%, respectively, after water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid and biofertilizer, alone or combined, increased cannabis photosynthetic efficiency by 12% relative to the control after water stress.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
application of HA and biofertilizer alone, or in combinatione0
Outcome
photosynthetic efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12%e0
Qualifier
after water stresse0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When compared to the control, the application of HA and biofertilizer alone, or in combination, increased plant height, chlorophyll content and photosynthetic efficiency by 55, 8 and 12%, respectively, after water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cannabis biomass of treated plants was rarely different from the control.

Taxon
CannabisCannabise0
Treatment
treated plantse0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Qualifier
rarely differente0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis
Cannabis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)United States Fish and Wildlife Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cannabis biomass of treated plants was rarely different from the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application of humic acid and biofertilizer resulted in additive, but not synergistic, increases in the measured parameters.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
combined application of HA + biofertilizere0
Outcome
increases in measured parametere0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
additive, but not synergistice0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of HA + biofertilizer resulted in additive, but not synergistic, increases in measured parameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1513 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–58 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Future research should focus on the effects of biostimulants on CBD/THC content in cannabis.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Outcome
CBD/THC contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Future research should focus on the effects of biostimulants on CBD/THC content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1594 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–58 · show in text ↑

other · physiology: photosynthesis · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

other · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.